中韓朱子學發展模式的比較
A Comparative Study of the Development Patterns of Zhuzixue in China and Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
中韓朱子學之間的比較研究存在兩種模式:一是韓國朱子學與作爲本源朱子 學的朱熹及其弟子所創立學問之間的縱向比較,二是韓國朱子學與同時期的中國 朱子學之間的橫向比較。在第二種比較的意義上,一方面考察中國宋元明清朱子學 發展的不同階段以及相應的義理展開過程;另一方面考察韓國朱子學從引進到二 十世紀初朝鮮王朝滅亡之間的發展歷程以及相應的義理論爭。可以看出,中國朱子 學的發展模式可以稱爲多元思想資源並存格局中的三起三落式,韓國朱子學則是 單一思想資源下的一起一落式。這一發展模式上的差異,需要綜合政治環境、思想 文化背景、以身體道的推動力量、學術思想成果以及學派立場等多方面因素,才可 以得到恰當理解。
Abstract
In regard to Zhuzixue 朱子學 (Study of Master Zhu) in China and South Korea, there are two main comparative approaches: one is the comparison between Zhuzixue developed in Korea and Zhuzixue formulated by Zhu Xi and his disciples. The other is the comparison between Zhuzixue in Korea and China during the same time period. These two kinds of comparison are conducive to examining how Zhuzixue showed different development patterns during the Song, Yuan, Ming, and Qing dynasties of China. In addition, these comparisons can elucidate how Zhuzixue evolved in Korea from its introduction to the fall of the Joseon Dynasty in the early twentieth century. The development patterns of Zhuzixue in China and Korea follow different paths: China has experienced three ups and downs in multilateral academic streams while Korea has experienced one up and down in a unilateral academic stream. These differences can be clearly explained only when we consider the two nations’ differences in various aspects, such as political environments, ideological and cultural backgrounds, and academic achievements.
참고문헌 (15)
- 陳來, "東亞儒學九論" (2008), 三聯書店
- 陳來, "中韓朱子學比較研究的意義", 中國社會科學報, (570) (2014)
- 崔根德, "韓國儒學思想研究" (1998), 科學技術文獻出版社
- 崔英辰, "韓國儒學思想研究" (2008), 東方出版社
- 鄧慶平, "傳承與開拓——朱子學新論" (2014), 華東師範大學出版社
- 郭鋒航, "明初朱子學研究", 博士, pp.2012
- 黃宗羲, "明儒學案" (1985), 中華書局
- 李甦平, "韓國儒學史" (2009), 人民出版社
- 李相益, "中國儒學的韓國收容與開展", 首屆韓中人文論壇論文集 (2014)
- 林月惠, "異曲同調:朱子學與朝鮮性理學" (2010), 國立臺灣大學出版中心
- 潘暢和, "論古代朝鮮的“兩班”及其文化特點", 東疆學刊, (3) (2010)
- 楊柱才, "胡敬齋思想研究", 中國哲學史 (2008)
- 楊祖漢, "延邊大學學報(哲學社會科學版)", (1) (1995)
- 尹絲淳, "韓國儒學史——韓國儒學的特性" (2017), 人民出版社
- 朱人求, "東亞朱子學的新課題", 福州大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (2) (2004)
