Rethinking the Foundation and Development of “East Asian Silhak”: With a Focus on the Establishment of Its Concept and Periodic Classification
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the seventeenth to the eighteenth centuries, East Asia witnessed new academic trends emphasizing social practice and reform over theoretical considerations. These trends gave rise to Silhak 實學 (“Practical Learning”) in Korea in the late Joseon dynasty, Qixue 氣學 (“Learning of Vital Forces”) in China in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, and Kogaku 古學 (“Ancient Learning”) in Japan in the Edo period. A concept of “East Asian Silhak 東亞實學 (East Asian Practical Learning)” can be conceived in the context of strengthening the Confucian statecraft in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, this academic trend, so-called East Asian Practical Learning, was manifested in the form of “pursuit of Westcentered modernity” in the three East Asian countries. It would be appropriate to understand it as a “modern transformation of East Asian Confucian thought” rather than as the Confucian statecraft in the context of Confucianism. When attempting to incorporate the ideological transformation of Confucianism in East Asia in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries into the concept of Silhak, there are issues such as: the conceptual confusion between Silhak of the late Joseon dynasty of Korea and Kaozhengxue 考證學 (“Evidential Learning”) of the Qing dynasty of China; and their pursuit of modernity based on the premise of anti-Zhuzi studies. Given these complexities, this article underscores that the genesis of New Silhak in twenty-first-century East Asia lies in the simultaneous relationship between Zhuzi studies and Silhak, reflecting the Confucian ideal of neisheng waiwang 內聖外王 (“inner sage and outer king”).
Abstract
In the seventeenth to the eighteenth centuries, East Asia witnessed new academic trends emphasizing social practice and reform over theoretical considerations. These trends gave rise to Silhak 實學 (“Practical Learning”) in Korea in the late Joseon dynasty, Qixue 氣學 (“Learning of Vital Forces”) in China in the late Ming and early Qing dynasties, and Kogaku 古學 (“Ancient Learning”) in Japan in the Edo period. A concept of “East Asian Silhak 東亞實學 (East Asian Practical Learning)” can be conceived in the context of strengthening the Confucian statecraft in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. However, in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, this academic trend, so-called East Asian Practical Learning, was manifested in the form of “pursuit of Westcentered modernity” in the three East Asian countries. It would be appropriate to understand it as a “modern transformation of East Asian Confucian thought” rather than as the Confucian statecraft in the context of Confucianism. When attempting to incorporate the ideological transformation of Confucianism in East Asia in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries into the concept of Silhak, there are issues such as: the conceptual confusion between Silhak of the late Joseon dynasty of Korea and Kaozhengxue 考證學 (“Evidential Learning”) of the Qing dynasty of China; and their pursuit of modernity based on the premise of anti-Zhuzi studies. Given these complexities, this article underscores that the genesis of New Silhak in twenty-first-century East Asia lies in the simultaneous relationship between Zhuzi studies and Silhak, reflecting the Confucian ideal of neisheng waiwang 內聖外王 (“inner sage and outer king”).
참고문헌 (31)
- Chen, Lai, "Everything Is Reason: Re-recognition of Chen Fuliang and the Yongjia School", Studies on Ye Shi and the Yongjia School, 3, pp.134~135 (2019)
- Chen, Xiyuan, "Historical Development of Mencius’ Thought" (1995), Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Zhongguo Wenzhe Yanjiusuo Choubeichu
- 조광, "개항기 및 식민지 시대 실학 연구의 특성", 한국 실학 연구, 7, pp.214~223 (2004)
- Dai, Zhen, "The Collected Works of Dai Zhen" (2009), Shanghai Guji Chubanshe
- Dai, Zhen, "The Collected Works of Dai Zhen" (2009), Shanghai Guji Chubanshe
- Dai, Zhen, "The Collected Works of Dai Zhen" (2009), Shanghai Guji Chubanshe
- Fukuzawa, Yukichi, "학문을 권함" (1993), Jiansa
- Ge, Rongjin, "The History of Practical Learning in the Ming and Qing Periods" (1989), Qilu Shushe
- Ge, Rongjin, "A History of Chinese Practical Learning Vol. 1" (1994), Shoudu Shifandaxue Chubanshe
- "Practical Learning of the Three Kingdoms" (2007)[URL]
- Gim, Gyoel, "Between “Li” and “Shangdi”: A Comparative Study of Zhu Xi and Jeong Yak-yong’s Theory of the Human Mind and the Moral Mind" (2020), Huamulan Culture Press
- 함현찬, "『論語徵』에 나타난 오규 소라이의 聖人觀", 양명학, 41, pp.337~365 (2015)
- 한예원, "일본의 실학에 관하여", 일본사상, 6, pp.209~238 (2004)
- 한영우, "다시, 실학이란 무엇인가" (2007), Pureun Yeoksa
- Jiang, Guanghui, "A Review of the Current Status of the Studies on the Practical Learning of the Ming and Qing Dynasty", Newsletter of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, 2(4), pp.10~16 (1992)
- 금장태, "한국유학의 탐구" (1999), Seoul National University Press
- Kojima, Yasunori, "논쟁을 통해 본 일본 사상", pp.213~252 (2001), Sungkyunkwan University Press
- 이홍직, "국사 대사전" (1999), Hakwon Publishing
- 이경구, "한국학 학술 용어" (2020), Academy of Korean Studies Press
- 이우성, "이우성 저작집" (2010), Changbi
- Liang, Qichao, "A History of Chinese Scholarship in the Past Three Hundred Years" (2017), Shangwu Yinshuguan
- 임형택, "동아시아 실학의 개념 정립을 위하여", 한국실학연구, 18, pp.7~39 (2009)
- 임형택, "신실학, 그 가능성과 방향", 한국실학연구, 22, pp.147~166 (2011)
- Lin, Yuehhui, "Reappraisal of “Dissent”: Neo-Confucianism and the Philosophy of Qi in Early Modern East Asia", Soochow Journal of Philosophical Studies, 34, pp.97~144 (2016)
- Maruyama, Masao, "Fukuzawa Yukichi and Japan’s Modernization" (1992), Xuelin Chubanshe
- Minamoto, Ryoen, "도쿠가와 시대의 철학 사상" (2000), Yemun Seowon
- Mogi, Makoto, "논쟁을 통해 본 일본 사상", pp.253~297 (2001), Sungkyunkwan University Press
- 노관범, "한국 통사로 보는 “실학”의 지식사 시론", 한국 문화, 88, pp.209~253 (2019)
- Ogawa, Haruhisa, "일본 실학의 형성과 발전", 일본 사상, 8, pp.1~83 (2005)
- Zheng, Zongyi, "Confucian Theories of Self-Cultivation and Energy", pp.247~277 (2005), National Taiwan University Press
- Zheng, Zongyi, "A Survey of Transition in Ming-Qing Confucianism: From Liu Zongzhou to Dai Dongyuan" (2009), Xianggang Zhongwendaxue Chubanshe