Early Modernity in Chosŏn Korea: An examination of two “Practical Learning” scholars
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article addresses evaluates the contributions of the School of Practical Learning in seventeenth and eighteenth-century Korea. The scholars described as members of the School of Practical Learning are often described as pioneers of modernity in Korea. However, according to most definitions of modernity, there are few ideas in the writings of Practical Learning scholars that can be clearly identified as modern. Nevertheless, some member of the School of Practical Learning contributed to Korean’s modernization in subtle ways. This article argues that Yi Ik (1682-1764, Hong Taeyong (1731-83) and Chŏng Yagyong (1762-1836) helped move Korea away from a pre-modern focus on function over substance and an accompanying preference for diffuse over-lapping abstractions toward a focus on substance and a preference for clearly-defined terms. Such a conceptual shift helped prepare Korea for the modern world, with its foundation in the quantitative analysis and manipulation of separate and discrete substances.
Abstract
This article addresses evaluates the contributions of the School of Practical Learning in seventeenth and eighteenth-century Korea. The scholars described as members of the School of Practical Learning are often described as pioneers of modernity in Korea. However, according to most definitions of modernity, there are few ideas in the writings of Practical Learning scholars that can be clearly identified as modern. Nevertheless, some member of the School of Practical Learning contributed to Korean’s modernization in subtle ways. This article argues that Yi Ik (1682-1764, Hong Taeyong (1731-83) and Chŏng Yagyong (1762-1836) helped move Korea away from a pre-modern focus on function over substance and an accompanying preference for diffuse over-lapping abstractions toward a focus on substance and a preference for clearly-defined terms. Such a conceptual shift helped prepare Korea for the modern world, with its foundation in the quantitative analysis and manipulation of separate and discrete substances.
참고문헌 (37)
- Ch?ng Yagyong, Y?yudang ch?ns, "The complete works of Ch?ng Yagyong", ~
- Kw?n T?kchu, trans. (Seoul: ?lyu mun’go, 1974), , 1974
- "Mencius, in Legge, James. Editor and translator. The Chinese Classics, volumes one through five (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press)", ~ (1960)
- Schall, Adam, "A host of evidence that God exists", ~
- Yi Hwang, T’oegye ch?ns, "The Complete works of T’oegye Yi Hwang", ~
- Yi I Yulgok, Ch?s?n, "The Complete works of Yulgok Yi I", ~
- Yi Ik. S?ngho saes?l, "Classified collection of the writings of Yi Ik", ~
- Yi Ik. S?ngho saes?l yus?n, "Collated selections from the Writings of Yi Ik", ~
- Zhu Xi, Zhuzi quanshu, "The complete Work of Zhu Xi", ~
- Don Baker, "The Religious Revolution in Modern Korean History: From ethics to theology and from ritual hegemony to religious freedom", Review of Korean Studies, 9(3), pp.249~275
- Don Baker, "The Use and Abuse of the Sirhak Label: A New Look at Sin Hu-dam and his S?hak Py?n", Kyohoesa Yn'gu, pp.183~254 (1981)
- Bloom, Alfred, "The Linguistic Shaping of Thought" (1981), Lawrence Erlbaun
- Capra, "The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism" (1975), Shambhala
- Chan, Wing-tsit, "Substance and Function", pp.222~234 (1989), University of Hawaii Press
- Ch’oi Y?ng-jin, "Chos?njo yuhak sasang ?i yangsang (Aspects of Confucian thought during the Chos?n dynasty)", Sungkyunkwan University Press
- "de Bary Theodore, and Irene Bloom, Sources of Chinese Tradition, Volume One, From Earliest Times to 1600" (1999), Columbia University Press
- Graham, A.C., "Being in Classical Chinese" (1960), Reidel Publ
- Graham, A.C., "The Relation of Chinese Thought to Chinese Language" (1989), Philosophical Arguments in Ancient China
- Hall David L., "Thinking Through Confucius" (1987), State University of New York Press
- Han Woo-keun, "Yijo sirhak ?i kaeny?n-e taehay", pp.355~393 (1961), ryu munwhasa
- Han’guk sasangsa y?n’guhoe, "Tos?llo pon?n han’guk yuhak (Korean Confucianism seen through explanatory diagrams)" (2003), Yemun s?w?n
- Hansen, Chad, "Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and Truth", Journal of Asian Studies, 44(3) (1985)
- Harbsmeier, Christoph, "Language and Logic", Cambridge University Press
- Hwang ?i-dong, "Yulgok ch’?rhak y?n’gu (A study of Yulgok’s philosophy)" (1987), Ky?ngmunsa
- Michael Kalton, "An Introduction to Silhak", pp.293~322 (2004), Hollym
- Michael Kalton, "Early Yi Dynasty Neo-Confucianism: An Integrated Vision", University of California
- "Neo-Confucianism: the 21st Century Interface"[URL]
- Michael Kalton, "To Become a Sage: The Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning by Yi T’oegye" (1988), Columbia University Press
- Yung Sik Kim, "Science and the Confucian Tradition in the Work of Ch?ng Yagyong", pp.127~166 (2004), Tasanhak
- K?m Chang-t’ae, "Han’guk yuhak ?i sims?l (Concepts of the mind in Korean Confucianism)" (2002), Seoul National University Press
- Palais, James B., "Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions: Yu Hy?ngw?n and the Late Chos?n Dynasty" (1996), University of Washington Press
- Pae Chongho, "Han'guk Yuhak charyochips?ng (A collection of primary documents of Korean Confucianism)" (1980), Yonsei University Press
- Porkert, Manfred, "The Theoretical Foundations of Chinese Medicine: Systems of Correspondence" (1974), MIT Press
- Raston, Michael, "Ideas of Self and Self-Cultivation in Korean Neo-Confucianism" (2001), unpublished doctoral dissertation
- Ricci, Matteo, "The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven, Douglas Lancashire and Peter Hu Kuo-chen" (1985), The Institute of Jesuit Sources