7세기 후반 신라의 영접의례 구성 - 당ㆍ일본과의 비교를 중심으로

Abstract

This paper was prepared to understand the universality and specificity of Silla's reception by comparing and reviewing the composition of the reception ceremony operated by Silla in the late 7th century with Tang Dynasty and Japan. According to the Da-Tang Kaiyuan Li (大唐開元禮), the reception ceremony of the Tang Dynasty was systematized based on the formality of beonshin(蕃臣禮). However, according to historical records, formalities of gusaeng (舅甥禮), hyeongje (兄弟禮), and jeokguk (敵國禮) were actually operated together. After the 7th century, Silla accepted its ideological status as a vassal of the Tang Dynasty emperor. For this reason, the formality of sadae (事大禮) was applied to the Tang Dynasty and the formality of gyorin (交隣禮) was applied to other neighboring countries such as Japan. In addition, the formality of hyeongje (兄弟禮) and the formality of gusaeng (舅甥禮) were applied to Anseung (安勝)'s Goguryeo (高句麗) and Bodeok-guk (報德國). On the other hand, the formality of beonshin (蕃臣禮) was applied to Tamna-guk (耽羅國). One of the important characteristics of the composition of the Silla‘s reception ceremony in the late 7th century is that it accepted and operated the Tang Dynasty's reception ceremony, but unlike the Tang Dynasty, the principles of Sadae (事大) and Gyorin (交隣) were applied. For this reason, it was possible to refer to the Tang Dynasty's reception ceremony, which was centered on the formality of beonshin (蕃臣禮), but it could not be applied to the reality of Silla as it was. Therefore, Silla studied Confucianism actively, and as a result, it was possible to form its own composition of reception ceremony according to the principle of Sadae (事大) and Gyorin (交隣) by transforming the Tang Dynasty's system. This is clearly different from the case of Japan, which transplanted the Tang Dynasty's composition of reception ceremony as it was and did not have specific regulations other than the formality of beonshin (蕃臣禮). In addition, the composition of Silla's reception ceremony was a result of considering not only the cause but also the practicality in a balanced manner. This is in contrast to the case of the Tang Dynasty, which adhered to the composition of an ideological reception ceremony far from real international relations based on the traditional Hwaih-gwan (華夷觀).