국문연구소 위원들의국어․국문 의식과 실천
The National Language Research Center Members’ Consciousness and Practice of Written Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The wording of the Korean Language Research Report in 1909 differed greatly among the center members. The members discussed and decided orthography of the Korean language, but the report included many Chinese words and phrases. Ju Shigyeong’s expressions included a few easy Chinese words and phrases relatively close to the spoken language and showed much recognition and use of the vernacular language. This position was followed by Ji Seogyeong. At that time, much Koreanology research was conducted in general, but those who later became pro-Japanese and lacked national consciousness showed poor awareness in the use of the vernacular language. Those with little research experience and career in the Korean language and literature showed similar aspects. Only two members of the center had professional knowledge, and most of others were non-experts. Therefore, it is regrettable to see that the discussions were not sufficiently profound and that the advanced practice of the Korean vernacular language was lacking in the discussions and research reports in terms of using contemporary Korean expressions.
Abstract
The wording of the Korean Language Research Report in 1909 differed greatly among the center members. The members discussed and decided orthography of the Korean language, but the report included many Chinese words and phrases. Ju Shigyeong’s expressions included a few easy Chinese words and phrases relatively close to the spoken language and showed much recognition and use of the vernacular language. This position was followed by Ji Seogyeong. At that time, much Koreanology research was conducted in general, but those who later became pro-Japanese and lacked national consciousness showed poor awareness in the use of the vernacular language. Those with little research experience and career in the Korean language and literature showed similar aspects. Only two members of the center had professional knowledge, and most of others were non-experts. Therefore, it is regrettable to see that the discussions were not sufficiently profound and that the advanced practice of the Korean vernacular language was lacking in the discussions and research reports in terms of using contemporary Korean expressions.
참고문헌 (24)
- 고영근, "개화기의 한국 어문운동 : 국한문혼용론과 한글전용론을 중심으로", 관악어문연구, 25, pp.5~21 (2000), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 고영진, "식민지 시기 전후의 언어 문제" (2012), 소명출판
- 국문연구소, "역대한국문법대계, 3(5)" (2008), 박이정출판사
- 국문연구소, "역대한국문법대계, 3(6)" (2008), 박이정출판사
- 김민수, "국문연구소, 유인 『국문연구안』에 대하여", 아세아연구, 63, pp.217~348 (1980), 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소
- 김병문, "언어적 근대의 기획" (2013), 소명출판
- 김주필, "대한제국 시기 國漢文의 형성과 기원 - 諺解와 관련하여", 반교어문연구, (38), pp.131~162 (2014), 반교어문학회
- 노연숙, "개화계몽기 국어국문운동의 전개와 양상 － 언문일치(言文一致)를 둘러싼 논쟁을 중심으로 －", 한국문화, (40), pp.59~99 (2007), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 민현식, "개화기 국어 문체 연구", 국어국문학, 111, pp.37~61 (1994), 국어국문학회
- 송철의, "한국 근대 초기의 어문학자" (2013), 태학사
- 송철의, "지석영과 주시경의 표기법", 관악어문연구, 38, pp.35~62 (2013), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 신창순, "국문연구소 『국문연구의정안』의 검토", 어문논집, 44, pp.5~49 (2001), 안암어문학회
- 이기문, "개화기의 국문연구" (1970), 일조각
- 이기문, "개화기의 국문 사용에 관한 연구", 한국문화, (5), pp.65~84 (1984), 규장각한국학연구원
- 이병근, "한국 근대 초기의 언어와 문학" (2005), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이상혁, "애국계몽기의 국어 의식", 어문논집, 41, pp.105~139 (2000), 안암어문학회
- 이상혁, "근대 학문 형성기 근대 국어의 성격에 대하여－문체의 변주와 어문규범의 길항을 중심으로", 아시아문화연구, 35, pp.167~194 (2014), 아시아문화연구소[DOI]
- 이정훈, "국문과 국어학의 여명", 동서인문학, (49), pp.37~57 (2015), 인문과학연구소
- 이현희, "근대 한국어 시기의 언어관․문자관 연구" (2014), 소명출판
- 임상석, "20세기 국한문체의 형성과정" (2008), 지식산업사
- 최경봉, "근대 국어학의 논리와 계보" (2016), 일조각
- 하동호, "역대한국문법대계, 3(3)" (2008), 박이정출판사
- 한동완, "국문연구의정안" (2006), 신구문화사
- 홍종선, "개화기 시대 문장의 문체 연구", 국어국문학, 117, pp.33~58 (1996), 국어국문학회