중세국어 ‘-오□’ 구성의 의미관계
The meaning relation of "-otaj(오□)" construction in 15th century Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is described and explored the meaning relation between `-otaj(오□)` clause and following clause in 15th century Korean by synchronic approach. There are 5 meaning relations in `-otaj(오□)` construction: core-description relation, arrangement relation, comparison/contrast relation, sequence relation and causation relation. Each relation has different types of relation. The core-description relation can be grouped into [setting up of perception] －[content of perception] and [setting up of speech]－[content of speech]. The arrangement relation has [contextual background]－[addition of event/state]. The comparison/contrast relation can be grouped into [background context]－ [contrast of event/state] and [background context]－[analogy of event/state]. In the sequence relation, there are [preceding context]－[following event/state] and [preceding context]－[reversal of event/state]. In the causation relation, [context of cause]－[making effect] and [context of cause]－[evaluation of event/state] are observed.
Abstract
This paper is described and explored the meaning relation between `-otaj(오□)` clause and following clause in 15th century Korean by synchronic approach. There are 5 meaning relations in `-otaj(오□)` construction: core-description relation, arrangement relation, comparison/contrast relation, sequence relation and causation relation. Each relation has different types of relation. The core-description relation can be grouped into [setting up of perception] －[content of perception] and [setting up of speech]－[content of speech]. The arrangement relation has [contextual background]－[addition of event/state]. The comparison/contrast relation can be grouped into [background context]－ [contrast of event/state] and [background context]－[analogy of event/state]. In the sequence relation, there are [preceding context]－[following event/state] and [preceding context]－[reversal of event/state]. In the causation relation, [context of cause]－[making effect] and [context of cause]－[evaluation of event/state] are observed.
참고문헌 (49)
- "訓民正音諺解, 약호 訓諺"
- "龍飛御天歌, 약호 龍歌"
- "釋譜詳節, 약호 釋詳"
- "月印千江之曲, 약호 月曲"
- "月印釋譜, 약호 月釋"
- "楞嚴經諺解, 약호 楞嚴"
- "法華經諺解, 약호 法華"
- "佛說阿彌陁經, 약호 阿彌"
- "救急方諺解, 약호 救急方"
- "內訓, 약호 內訓"
- "分類杜工部詩諺解(初刊本), 약호 杜詩"
- "三綱行實圖(런던大學本), 약호 三綱런던", ~
- "金剛經三家解, 약호 金三"
- "救急簡易方, 약호 救簡"
- "樂學軌範, 약호 樂學軌範"
- 고영근, "텍스트 이론" (1999), 아르케
- 고영근, "(개정판) 표준중세국어문법론" (2004), 집문당
- 권재일, "중세 한국어 접속문 연구. in: 역사언어학(김방한선생 회갑기념논문집)" (1985), 전예원
- 권재일, "접속문 구성의 변천 양상", 언어, 13(2) (1988), 한국언어학회
- 김방한, "언어학 연구사" (1991), 서울대학교출판부
- 김봉순, "국어교육과 텍스트구조" (2002), 서울대학교출판부
- 김송원, "15세기 중기 국어의 접속월 연구", 박사, pp.1989
- 김완진, "노걸대의 언해에 대한 비교연구" (1976), 한국연구원
- 리의도, "우리말 이음씨끝의 통시적 연구" (1990), 어문각
- 안병희, "중세국어문법론" (2001), 학연사
- 서정수, "(수정삼판) 국어문법" (2006), 한세본
- 이기문, "(초판) 국어사개설" (1961), 민중서관
- 이기문, "(개정) 국어사개설" (1974), 민중서관
- 이기문, "(신정판) 국어사개설" (1998), 태학사
- 이숭녕, "고전 문법" (1961), 을유문화사
- 이숭녕, "(개정증보판) 중세국어문법론: 15세기국어를 주로 하여" (1981), 을유문화사
- 이은경, "국어의 연결어미 연구" (2000), 태학사
- 이은희, "텍스트언어학과 국어교육" (2000), 서울대학교출판부
- 이현희, "중세국어 내적화법의 성격", 한신논문집, 3 (1986), 한신대학교
- 이현희, "소학의 언해에 대한 비교 연구", 한신논문집, 5 (1988), 한신대학교
- 이현희, "중세국어 구문연구" (1994), 신구문화사
- 이현희, "‘둏다’ 구문에 대한 통시적 연구", 진단학보, 87 (1999), 진단학회
- 임지룡, "국어 의미론" (1995), 탑출판사
- 최동주, "중세 국어 문법. in: 국어의 시대별 변천·실태 연구 1: 중세 국어" (1996), 국립국어연구원
- 최소영, "연결어미 '-오'의 역사적 연구", 석사, pp.2008
- 허웅, "옛말본" (1970), 과학사
- 허웅, "우리 옛말본: 15세기 국어 형태론" (1975), 샘문화사
- Brinker, K., "텍스트언어학의 이해" (1994), 한국문화사
- Kintsch, W., "The Representation of Meaning in Memory" (1974), Lawrence Eribaum Associates
- Meyer, B.J.F., "The Organization of Prose and Its Effects on Memory" (1975), North Holland
- Meyer, B.J.F., "Signaling the structure of text. in: The Technology of Text Ⅱ" (1985), Educational Technology Publications
- Searle, J. R., "Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language" (1969), Cambridge University Press
- Searle, J. R., "Indirect speech acts. in: Expression and Meaning" (1979), Cambridge University Press
- van Dijk, "Strategies of Discourse Comprehension" (1983), Academic Press