본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주어의 개념에 대하여

The Concept of Subject

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Traditionally, Subject and Predicate are two main constituents of the sentence. It has been understood that Predicate says something about Subject. With regard to the concept of Subject, various definitions have existed for a very long time. In Traditional Grammar, Subject is the most prominent overt argument of Predicate. In this way, Subject and Predicate are called ‘onoma’ and ‘rhema’ respectively. In any languages that have case systems, Subject is marked by a specific Case, frequently the Nominative. This paper investigates the concept of Subject, and categorizes the concept by three dimensions as follows: 1. the definition of Subject, 2. the identification of Subject, 3. the verification of Subject. Add to this, this paper deals with the Spec-Head Agreement, L-Language/M-Language, recovering the omitted Subject Case.

Abstract

Traditionally, Subject and Predicate are two main constituents of the sentence. It has been understood that Predicate says something about Subject. With regard to the concept of Subject, various definitions have existed for a very long time. In Traditional Grammar, Subject is the most prominent overt argument of Predicate. In this way, Subject and Predicate are called ‘onoma’ and ‘rhema’ respectively. In any languages that have case systems, Subject is marked by a specific Case, frequently the Nominative. This paper investigates the concept of Subject, and categorizes the concept by three dimensions as follows: 1. the definition of Subject, 2. the identification of Subject, 3. the verification of Subject. Add to this, this paper deals with the Spec-Head Agreement, L-Language/M-Language, recovering the omitted Subject Case.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 김민국, "부사격 조사 ‘로서’ 주어에 대한 연구", 한국어학, 60, pp.111~142 (2013), 한국어학회
  2. 김원경, "한국어의 격" (2009), 박문사
  3. 김원경, "‘여격 주어’는 진정한 주어인가?", 언어과학연구, (70), pp.19~44 (2014), 언어과학회
  4. 리, "표준중국어문법" (2009), 한울아카데미
  5. 박재희, "여격 주어 구문의 갈래와 형성", 어문론총, 56(56), pp.41~70 (2012), 한국문학언어학회[DOI]
  6. 박철우, "한국어에는 주어가 없는가?", 한국언어학회 가을학술대회 발표집, pp.91~104 (2013)
  7. 이인영, "러시아어 ‘여격 주어’구문 재고", 러시아연구, 17(1), pp.205~240 (2007), 러시아연구소
  8. 이홍식, "국어 문장의 주성분 연구" (2000), 월인
  9. 임홍빈, "21세기 국어학의 과제", pp.1279~1320 (2000), 월인
  10. 임홍빈, "한국어의 주제와 통사 분석" (2007), 서울대학교 출판부
  11. 한정한, "국어의 주어를 어떻게 정의해야 하는가?: 유형론의 관점, 서술어의 유형별 주어 정의", 한국어학, 60, pp.189~225 (2013), 한국어학회
  12. Whaley, "언어유형론" (2010), 소통

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)