본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘주제-주제문’의 의미 관계를 통해 본 대학글쓰기 교육의 과제

A Study on the College Writing Education through the Relation of ‘Theme-Thesis Statement’

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In college writing class, the major lesson objective is to make students create the valuable theme with in-depth thinking and diversity. For this, learners need to realize the importance of creating a thesis statement. However, it is rare for students to realize that they have difficulty in making a thesis statement. The learners implicitly tend to consider that a thesis statement is already given, and they cannot realize the necessity of the efforts to make a thesis statement on their own. In order to solve this problem, this article investigates the prior college curriculum related to the thesis statement and the textbook of ‘speech communication and written composition’. Based on the analysis result, this article observes how the implication of theme and thesis statement affect the learners;and proves that the implication of the curriculum isn’t connected to students’ learning on theme and thesis statement. That is, in curriculum, by only exposing the theme, not reflecting the thesis statement, it is suggested that learners are likely to learn that thesis statement as well as theme is given like situational context. In order to ensure that the college writing education has “the depth of the theme”, it is necessary to reflect the process of modifying and expanding the result of the previous learning at the level of the professor - learner in the class. It is also important to consider the characteristics of college writing that you read base writing. In particular, it is important to provide opportunities for learners to experience the process of detailedization of the theme to be done in relation to ‘theme – thesis statement’.

Abstract

In college writing class, the major lesson objective is to make students create the valuable theme with in-depth thinking and diversity. For this, learners need to realize the importance of creating a thesis statement. However, it is rare for students to realize that they have difficulty in making a thesis statement. The learners implicitly tend to consider that a thesis statement is already given, and they cannot realize the necessity of the efforts to make a thesis statement on their own. In order to solve this problem, this article investigates the prior college curriculum related to the thesis statement and the textbook of ‘speech communication and written composition’. Based on the analysis result, this article observes how the implication of theme and thesis statement affect the learners;and proves that the implication of the curriculum isn’t connected to students’ learning on theme and thesis statement. That is, in curriculum, by only exposing the theme, not reflecting the thesis statement, it is suggested that learners are likely to learn that thesis statement as well as theme is given like situational context. In order to ensure that the college writing education has “the depth of the theme”, it is necessary to reflect the process of modifying and expanding the result of the previous learning at the level of the professor - learner in the class. It is also important to consider the characteristics of college writing that you read base writing. In particular, it is important to provide opportunities for learners to experience the process of detailedization of the theme to be done in relation to ‘theme – thesis statement’.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. "2011", ~
  2. "2009 개정교육과정에 따른 고등학교 핵심성취기준의 이해, 고등학교 국어" (2014), 교육부[URL]
  3. 김남미, "비판적사고 능력 확장을 위한 글쓰기 교수방안", 대학작문, 5, pp.133~166 (2012), 대한작문학회
  4. 김남미, "비평적 문식성 신장을 위한 서평글쓰기 교육", 교양교육연구, 11(2), pp.175~210 (2017), 한국교양교육학회
  5. 김재봉, "2007년 개정 국어과 교육과정과 맥락의 수용 문제", 새국어교육, (77), pp.69~98 (2007), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
  6. 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 국어과 성취기준 및 성취수준개발 연구, "남민우", 교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 CRC 2012-3 (2012)
  7. 박영목, "화법과 작문Ⅰ" (2011), ㈜천재교육
  8. 박창균, "듣기·말하기 교육에서 맥락 설정에 관한 연구", 박사, 국어교육, pp.2008
  9. 송기헌, "화법과 작문Ⅰ" (2011), ㈜교학사
  10. 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 고등학교 국어과 핵심 성취기준개발 연구, "양정실", ~, pp.연구보고 CRC 2014-5-2 (2014)
  11. 이삼형, "화법과 작문 Ⅰ" (2011), ㈜지학사
  12. 이윤빈, "담화 종합을 통한 텍스트 구성 양상 연구 : 쓰기 과제 표상과 텍스트 구성의 관계를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
  13. 이재기, "맥락 중심 문식성 교육 방법론", 청람어문교육, (34), pp.99~128 (2006), 청람어문교육학회
  14. 임상우, "주제의 깊이 확보를 위한 대학 작문 교과의 피드백 방안", 리터러시 연구, (19), pp.95~128 (2017), 한국 리터러시 학회[DOI]
  15. 장성민, "고등학교 교과서에 나타난 작문 맥락 분석 - “국어Ⅱ”의 설득적 글쓰기 단원을 중심으로", 작문연구, (23), pp.107~145 (2014), 한국작문학회
  16. 정혜승, "독자와 대화하는 글쓰기: 대화적 문식성 교육을 위한 작문 과정과 전략 탐구" (2013), 사회평론
  17. Hyland, K., "Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing", Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), pp.1091~1112 (2002)
  18. Grabe, W., "Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing", pp.242~262 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  19. Hirvela, A., "Connecting Reading & Writing in Second Language Writing Instruction" (2004), University of Michigan Press
  20. Shanahan, T., "Handook of Writing Research", pp.171~183 (2006), The GuilfordPress
  21. Sommers N., "Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers", College Composition and Communication, 31(4), pp.378~388 (1980)
  22. Weigle, S. C., "쓰기평가" (2017), 글로벌 콘텐츠

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)