한·중 비교구문의 매개변이 관점
A View on Parametric Variations between Korean and Chinese Comparatives
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Based on the contrastive research on Korean and Chinese comparatives, this paper examines the degree abstraction parameter (Beck et als. 2004), which has widely been accepted as an account for cross-linguistic variations of comparatives. This paper argues that both Korean and Chinese allow clausal comparatives as well as phrasal comparatives, thereby involving a comparison predicate either with ‘individual comparison’ or with ‘degree comparison’, which cannot be expected from the degree abstraction parameter. Despite sharing these essential characteristics, Chinese, in contrast to Korean, does not permit attributive comparatives nor it allows those with object comparison standards. These major contrasts rather should be explained by resorting to an individual morpho-syntactic feature of a certain element which participates in forming comparatives.
Abstract
Based on the contrastive research on Korean and Chinese comparatives, this paper examines the degree abstraction parameter (Beck et als. 2004), which has widely been accepted as an account for cross-linguistic variations of comparatives. This paper argues that both Korean and Chinese allow clausal comparatives as well as phrasal comparatives, thereby involving a comparison predicate either with ‘individual comparison’ or with ‘degree comparison’, which cannot be expected from the degree abstraction parameter. Despite sharing these essential characteristics, Chinese, in contrast to Korean, does not permit attributive comparatives nor it allows those with object comparison standards. These major contrasts rather should be explained by resorting to an individual morpho-syntactic feature of a certain element which participates in forming comparatives.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김정대, "‘보다’ 비교구문의 기저 구조", 주시경학보, 8 (1991), 주시경연구소
- 김정아, "중세국어의 비교구문 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 류병래, "한국어 비교구문의 비교표지 ‘더’의 필수성과 수의성", 언어와 정보, 21(2), pp.189~211 (2017), 한국언어정보학회
- 박소영, "한국어 절-비교구문의 관계절 분석에 대한 반론", 생성문법연구, 28(2), pp.253~272 (2018), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 송홍규, "차등 비교 구문과 정도차 표현", 동악어문학, (69), pp.145~170 (2016), 동악어문학회
- 오경숙, "한국어의 비교구문 연구" (2010), 박이정
- 우순조, "한국어 차등비교구문에서의 ‘더’와 ‘덜’의 분포 연구", 國語學, (78), pp.77~104 (2016), 국어학회[DOI]
- 홍윤표, "근대국어 연구 I" (1994), 태학사
- Beck, S., "Parametric variation in the semantics of comparison: Japanese vs. English", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13(4), pp.289~344 (2004)
- Bhatt, R., "Direct comparison: Resurrecting the direct analysis of phrasal comparatives", SALT, 17, pp.19~36 (2007)
- Bhatt, R., "Late merger of degree clauses", Linguistic Inquiry, 35(1), pp.1~45 (2004)
- Bhatt, R., "Reduced and unreduced phrasal comparatives", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, pp.581~620 (2011)
- Bresnan, J., "Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 4, pp.275~343 (1973)
- 최현숙, "On the nature of the optionality of the morpheme te in Korean phrasal comparatives", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.717~741 (2008), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 최현숙, "On the Operator Movement in Korean Comparatives: Is It LBE or Pied-piping?", 생성문법연구, 21(3), pp.485~500 (2011), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Erlewine, M., "A new syntax-semantics for the Mandarin bi comparative", M.A., pp.2007
- Heim, I., "Notes on comparatives and related matters", Ms, pp.1985
- Heine, B., "Cognitive Foundations of Grammar" (1997), Oxford University Press
- Jhang, S. -E., "Headed nominalization in Korean: relative clause, clefts and comparatives" (1994), Hankook Publishing
- Kennedy, C., "Parameters of comparison", Ms, pp.2005
- Kennedy, C., "Modes of comparison", CLS, 43, pp.141~165 (2009)
- 김종복, "A Phrasal Analysis of Korean Comparatives", 생성문법연구, 20(2), pp.179~205 (2010), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Lechner, W., "Reduced and phrasal comparatives", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19(4), pp.683~735 (2001)
- Jeong-ShikLee, "Ellipsis in Korean Comparatives", 현대문법연구, (30), pp.155~179 (2002), 현대문법학회
- Lin, J. -W., "Chinese comparatives and their implicational parameters", Natural Language Semantics, 17, pp.1~27 (2009)
- Liu, C. -S. L., "The Chinese geng clausal comparative", Lingua, 120(6), pp.1579~1606 (2010)
- Liu, C. -S. L., "The Chinese bi comparative", Lingua, 121(12), pp.1767~1795 (2011)
- Pancheva, R., "Phrasal and clausal comparatives in Slavic", Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, 14 (2006)
- Park, S. -Y., "Three types of Korean comparatives", Japanese, 2009, pp.16, ~[DOI]
- 박소영, "Korean Clausal Comparatives Revisited: Korean has genuine clausal comparatives", 생성문법연구, 20(3), pp.473~498 (2010), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Shimoyama, J., "Reassessing crosslinguistic variation in clausal comparatives", Natural Language Semantics, 20, pp.83~113 (2012)
- Sudo, Y., "Hidden nominal structures in Japanese clausal comparatives", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 24, pp.1~51 (2015)
- Xiang, M., "Some topics in comparative constructions", Ph.D, pp.2005