본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

朝鮮文人對‘心畵說’的接受和發展的研究

The Acceptance and Development of the Painting Theory for the Korean Scholars

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

本論文旨在突破以筆法或章法爲中心的實用性的書法批評理論的限制, 從心學的角度對‘心畵說’這一重要的書法 批評理論進行探討. 特別是‘心畵說’不僅對中國書畵家書法作品鑒賞評論產生了重要影響, 而且對一衣帶水的朝鮮文 人也產生了重要的影響. 本論文通過對朝鮮文人對‘心畵說’的接受狀況的考察, 分析這一學說在朝鮮所得到的發展, 及闡明朝鮮文人在接受發展的過程中, 將‘心畵說’與理學相聯系, 形成其獨有的書法批評理論和審美觀. 首先, 對‘心畵說’的起源進行了探究. 西漢學者揚雄所說的“書, 心畵也”成爲心畵說的發端. 對‘書’進行字義的訓 詁, 發現其所具有書寫, 書籍·文字,及六經等含義. ‘書’字本身豐富的含義爲‘心畵說’充實發展提供了基礎. ‘心畵 說’理論可分爲三個部分, 一是揚雄的‘書為心畵說’, 二是‘心正則筆正說’, 三是‘書如其人說’. 這三個部分有機構成了 ‘心畵說’理論體系. 其次, 對朝鮮文人對‘心畵說’接受發展情況進行了考察. 其接受發展情況同樣可以分爲三部分, 一是對揚雄‘書為心 畵說’的接受和運用, 二是對柳公權‘心正則筆正說’的認識和發展, 三是對朱熹‘書如其人說’有關觀點的積極接受. 通 過考察發現, 朝鮮文人不僅對心畵說以及中國的書法有深入的認識了解, 而且在接受‘心畵說’的過程中, 通過新的視 角, 運用新的方法, 來對‘心畵說’進行全新的詮釋, 極大豐富發展了‘心畵說’理論體系. 通過本文的論述可以發現, ‘心畵說’本身所包含的內容的多樣性決定了朝鮮文人對其積極接受的態度. 特別是其 本身所具有的心學的特征, 更是被朝鮮文人所看重. 而朝鮮文人在接受‘心畵說’的過程中, 相較於心學, 更多的將‘心 畵說’與理學相聯系, 形成了具有朝鮮文人特色的理學性的‘心畵說’理論體系. 理學性的‘心畵說’不僅對朝鮮文人的書 法批評活動產生重要影響, 並直接對當時的審美觀和美學意識的形成也產生重要的影響.

Abstract

This thesis aims at getting out of the restriction of the practical calligraphy criticism theory at the center of the brushwork and the writing rules. Discussing the important calligraphy theory— the “Painting Theory” in the perspective of the mind-philosophy. Especially not only does the “Painting Theory” has an essential influence on the appreciation and comment for the Chinese calligraphers’ works, but also affecting the Korean scholars. The thesis analyzes the development of this theory in the Korea and illustrates the Koreans who connect with the Painting Theory and the Neo-Confucianism in the period of the acceptance via exploring the acceptance of the Painting Theory for the Korean scholars, getting form into its unique calligraphy criticism and aesthetics. In the first instance, exploring on the origin of the “Painting Theory”. As what the scholars in the Western Han Dynasty Yang Xiong said “The books are similar to the paintings”, which becomes the beginning of the Painting Theory. Discovering it possesses the meaning of the writings, books, characters and six classics with the exegesis on the literal meaning in the “book”. The abundant meaning of the “book” provides the basis for the full development of the “Painting Theory”. The “Painting Theory” can be divided into 3 parts. One is the basic “Painting Theory”, second is “the theory of the righteous pen with the righteous mind”, third is “calligraphy-person resemblance”. The 3 parts consist of the “Painting Theory” system. Secondly, exploring the acceptance condition of the “Painting Theory” for the Korean scholars, which can be divided into 3 parts. One is the acceptance and application towards the Yang Xiong’s “Painting Theory”, second is the recognition and development towards the Liu Gongquan’s “the theory of the righteous pen with the righteous mind”, third is the positive acceptance for the Zhu xi’s “calligraphy-person resemblance”. By exploring, discovering that not only does the Korean scholars have a deep knowledge for the Painting Theory and the Chinese calligraphy, but also explaining the “Painting Theory” with the comprehensive explanation in the process of accepting the “Painting Theory” by the new perspectives and methods, and extremely develop the “Painting Theory” system. It can be discovered via this thesis that the diversity of the content that the “Painting Theory” itself includes determine the positive attitudes for the Korean scholars. Especially the feature of the mind-philosophy it possesses attaches importance to the Korean scholars. However, in the process of accepting the “Painting Theory”, comparing with the mind-philosophy, it forms the “Painting Theory” system which has the Korean scholars’ characteristic Neo-Confucianism with connecting with the “Painting Theory” and the Neo-Confucianism. The “Painting Theory” of the Neo-Confucianism has an essential influence on the calligraphy criticism for the Korean scholars, and directly affects the temporal form of the aesthetics and consciousness.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. 姜柏年, "雪峯遺稿", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  2. 徐居正, "四佳集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  3. 徐榮輔, "竹石館遺集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  4. 申箕善, "陽園遺集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  5. 宋秉璿, "淵齋集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  6. 宋時烈, "宋子大全", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  7. 兪彦鎬, "燕石", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  8. 李穡, "牧隱藁", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  9. 李瀷, "星湖全集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  10. 李載毅, "文山集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  11. 李齊賢, "益齋亂藁", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  12. 正祖, "弘齋全書", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  13. 車天輅, "五山集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  14. 崔岦, "簡易文集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  15. 崔致遠, "孤雲先生文集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  16. 崔興璧, "蠹窩集", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  17. 洪敬謨, "冠巖全書冊", 韓國古典綜合DB, ~
  18. 杜甫, "杜工部集", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  19. 黃庭堅, "黃庭堅詩全集", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  20. 康有為, "廣藝舟雙楫", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  21. 歐陽脩, "歐陽脩集", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  22. 蘇軾, "東坡及", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  23. 蘇軾, "蘇軾集", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  24. 汪挺, "書法粹言", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  25. "新唐書", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  26. 朱熹, "晦庵集", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  27. 朱熹, "朱文公文集", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  28. 朱熹, "朱子語類", 中國哲學書電子化計劃, ~
  29. "韓國古典綜合DB"[URL]
  30. "中國哲學書電子化計劃"[URL]
  31. 叢文俊, "中國書法史·先秦秦代卷" (2002), 江蘇教育出版社
  32. 華東師範大學古籍整理研究室, "歷代書法論文選" (1979), 上海書畵出版社
  33. 孔安國, "尚書正義" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
  34. 酈承銓, "說文解字敘講疏" (1935), 商務印書館
  35. 劉熙載, "藝概" (1978), 上海古籍出版社
  36. 汪榮寶, "法言義疏" (1987), 中華書局
  37. 王鎮遠, "中國書法理論史" (1996), 黃山書社
  38. 곽노봉, "‘書如其人’에 대한 管窺", 서예학연구, (27), pp.257~283 (2015), 한국서예학회
  39. 盧今仙, "雪舟 宋運會的書藝硏究", 博士, pp.2011
  40. 조민환, "李漵『筆訣』에 나타난 中和中心主義的 書藝認識", 서예학연구, (25), pp.5~26 (2014), 한국서예학회
  41. 조민환, "息山 李萬敷의 書藝美學에 관한 연구", 양명학, (42), pp.175~202 (2015), 한국양명학회
  42. 趙鐘植, "尤庵宋時烈書藝美學的研究", 碩士, pp.2008
  43. 崔慶春, "坯窩 金相肅的稷下體及書藝論的特徵", ~
  44. 崔陸遠, "“書如其人”思想的歷史發展及意義研究", 碩士, pp.2014
  45. 劉亞麗, "淺談書法教育中“心畵”思想的重要性", 呂梁學院學報, 06 (2011)
  46. 劉華靜, "書如其人說研究", 碩士, pp.2013
  47. 秦威威, "朱熹書法研究", 碩士, pp.2015
  48. 姚宇亮, "從朱熹書學看宋代儒學復興對書法的影響", 碩士, pp.2003
  49. 于唯德, "書爲心畵: 中國書法藝術的人本表徵", 書法之友, 10 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)