본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

SR (Social Responsibility) Report Analysis for Chinese Automobile Makers: Comparison with Global Standard, GRI G3.1

최병헌
중국연구센터 (China Research Center)|2014.09|중국과 중국학 (China and Sinology)|제23권 |pp. 297-336|DOI 10.17935/Chinan.2014.23..297

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)China CSRChinese SR ReportAutomobile Maker CSR of ChinaGlobal Reporting Initiative (GRI) G3.1중국 CSR중국 기업의 사회적 책임보고서중국 자동차 기업 사회적 책임GRI 가이드라인 G3.1

초록

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is becoming a more and morecritical issue in China. Not only the Chinese government but also majorSOEs (State Owned Enterprises), small and medium sized firms alreadyhave deeply involved in SR (Social Responsibility) issues. This studyaccessed the recognition gap of Chinese automobile makers for theglobal CSR guideline by investigating their SR reports. As a globalstandard of CSR reporting and performance evaluation, this studyapplied the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guideline G3.1. As a resultthere existed a serious discrepancy between major SOEs’ SR reports andthe global standard as for three aspects; the completeness, themeasurability, and the reliability of the SR report. Most of automobilemakers followed the Chinese own CSR standard, mostly ChineseAcademy of Social Science (CASS) CSR 2.0. However, four globalmakers; GM, Toyota, Volkswagen and Hyundai substantially coveredthe performance indicators of the GRI G3.1 or the ISO26000. It isclosely concerned with the limitation of government‐led CSR initiativesin creating the CSR having ‘Chinese characteristics.’ Further, such acooperative structure among the government, the CSR researchinstitutes and SOEs for taking CSR initiatives without NGOs’monitoring leads to the discrepancy with the global standards.

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is becoming a more and morecritical issue in China. Not only the Chinese government but also majorSOEs (State Owned Enterprises), small and medium sized firms alreadyhave deeply involved in SR (Social Responsibility) issues. This studyaccessed the recognition gap of Chinese automobile makers for theglobal CSR guideline by investigating their SR reports. As a globalstandard of CSR reporting and performance evaluation, this studyapplied the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guideline G3.1. As a resultthere existed a serious discrepancy between major SOEs’ SR reports andthe global standard as for three aspects; the completeness, themeasurability, and the reliability of the SR report. Most of automobilemakers followed the Chinese own CSR standard, mostly ChineseAcademy of Social Science (CASS) CSR 2.0. However, four globalmakers; GM, Toyota, Volkswagen and Hyundai substantially coveredthe performance indicators of the GRI G3.1 or the ISO26000. It isclosely concerned with the limitation of government‐led CSR initiativesin creating the CSR having ‘Chinese characteristics.’ Further, such acooperative structure among the government, the CSR researchinstitutes and SOEs for taking CSR initiatives without NGOs’monitoring leads to the discrepancy with the global standards.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 최병헌, "중국 내 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)의 유형과 영향에 관한 연구 - 도요타, 폭스바겐, GM의 CSR활동 사례를 중심으로 -", 중국학연구, 45(45), pp.387~422 (2008), 중국학연구회
  2. 위오기, "A Study on the Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) Reinforcement in China; Focusing on Chinese Automobile Industry", International Area Studies Review, 11(2), pp.33~54 (2008), 국제지역연구센터
  3. 최병헌, "A Study on Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) Type of Foxconn after Employee Suicide Accidents in China", 한중사회과학연구, 11(3), pp.241~274 (2013), 한중사회과학학회
  4. Carlos Noronha, "Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: An Overview and Comparison with Major Trends", Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, pp.29~42 (2013)
  5. 이찬우, "중국내 기업의 사회적 책임 형성과 발전-CSR 보고서와 평가시스템 분석을 중심으로-", 한중사회과학연구, 11(4), pp.149~176 (2013), 한중사회과학학회
  6. Damien Ma, "CSR Resources for Your China Business", China Business Review.com, 34~35 (2007)
  7. Fang Lee Cooke, "Corporate social responsibility and HRM in China: a study of textile and apparel enterprises", Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(3), pp.355~376 (2010)
  8. Hyun Joo Ha, "Major Contents for Revision of GRI G3.1 Guideline", Sustainability Issue Papers, 122, pp.1~11 (2011)
  9. Johan Graafland, "Corporate Social Responsibility in China: implementation and challenges", Business Ethics: A European Review, 23(1), pp.34~49 (2014)
  10. Juelin Yin, "Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from China", Journal of Business Ethic, 111(2), pp.301~316 (2012)
  11. Kristian H. Darigan, "Corporate Citizenship in China: CSR Challenges in the ‘Harmonious Society", Journal of Contemporary China, 35, pp.39~53 (2009)
  12. Lei Wang, "Corporate Social Responsibility in the Chinese Forest Industry: Understanding Multiple Stakeholder Perceptions", Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 20(3), pp.129~145 (2013)
  13. Li‐Wen Lin, "Corporate Social Responsibility in China: Window Dressing or Structural Change?", Berkeley Journal of International Law, 28, pp.64~100 (2010)
  14. Michael A. Levine, "China’s CSR Expectations Mature", China Business Review.com, 50~53 (2008)
  15. Michael E. Porter, "Strategy & Society", Harvard Business Review, pp.62~77 (2006)
  16. Michael E. Porter, "Creating Shared Value", Harvard Business Review, pp.78~92 (2011)
  17. 김용준, "중국 상업은행의 CSR유형 분석 -중국민생은행의 사회적 책임 활동 사례를 중심으로-", 중소연구, 35(2), pp.107~140 (2011), 아태지역연구센터
  18. "Sustainability Reporting Guidelines; Version 3.1" (2011)[URL]
  19. "G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines" (2013)[URL]
  20. SAIC Social Responsibility Report 2012, "SAIC", 5~58 (2013)
  21. FAW Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2012, "FAW", 6~84 (2013)
  22. DFM Corporation Social Responsibility Report 2012, "DFM", 4~86 (2013)
  23. BAW Corporation Social Responsibility Report 2012, "BAG", 2~102 (2013)
  24. GAIA Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2012, "GAIG.", 5~44 (2013)
  25. Geely Holding Group Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2012, "Geely", 3~87 (2013)
  26. BYD Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2012, "BYD", 3~52 (2013)
  27. GM 2012 Sustainability Report, "GM", 3~109 (2013)
  28. Toyota Sustainability Report 2013, "Toyota", 2~79 (2014)
  29. Volkswagen Sustainability Report 2013, "Volkswagen", 8~167 (2013)
  30. HMC 2013 Sustainability Report, "Hyundai Motor Company", 8~95 (2013)
  31. "ChangAn Corporate Social Responsibility Report" (2012)[URL]
  32. Chinese Corportate Social Responsibility Report Guidelines; Version 2.0, "Chinses Academy of Social Science", 29~91 (2011)
  33. "SAIC SR website"[URL]
  34. "FAW SR website"[URL]
  35. "DFM SR website"[URL]
  36. "ChangAn SR website"[URL]
  37. "BAG SR website"[URL]
  38. "GAIG SR website"[URL]
  39. "Geely SR website"[URL]
  40. "BYD SR website"[URL]
  41. "Chery SR website"[URL]
  42. "GWM SR website"[URL]
  43. "GM SR website"[URL]
  44. "Toyota SR website"[URL]
  45. "HMC SR website"[URL]
  46. "Volkswagen SR website"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

지속성장을 위한 사회적 책임(CSR)의 전략적 활용: 중국 내 자동차 기업에 대한 탐색적 사례연구권상집, 백서인한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2015 · 제16권 제3호중국 내 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)의 유형과 영향에 관한 연구 - 도요타, 폭스바겐, GM의 CSR활동 사례를 중심으로 -최병헌중국학연구회 · 중국학연구2008 · 제45호Analysis on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of Multinational Corporations (MNC) in China정상은, 한석희한국세계지역학회 · 세계지역연구논총2008 · 제26권 제2호The Effects of Political Ties on the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Performance in China곽주영, 김미혜, 조려방한국경영사학회 · 경영사연구2021 · 제36권 제1호Limitation of Alternative Fuel Vehicle (AFV) Development Plan in China: Mismatch between Government Initiative Model and Market최병헌중국연구센터 · 중국과 중국학2015 · 제25권 A Study on the Relationship among Financial Performance, CSR and CSR Motivation with Chinese Companies고우, 한길석한국창업학회 · 한국창업학회지2018 · 제13권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

외국계 대형마트에 대한 중국소비자의 소비인식에 관한 연구-다룬파(RT-Mart)와 롯데(Lotte Mart)를 중심으로-추락지, 박상수, 박현정pp. 1-26일본에 대한 한국 및 중국 소비자의 적대감 효과에 관한 연구곽의, 안종석, 황설빈pp. 27-66중국어 속 여성 차별언어의 문화언어학적 고찰김현태pp. 67-91시진핑의 중국의 꿈(中國夢)과 과학발전관(科學發展觀)의 미래 발전이종화pp. 93-124중국 외교정책 결정과정에 미치는 이데올로기적 요소 분석남종호pp. 125-144
원문 보기