본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국의 선박유류오염손해배상 및 보상제도

China Shipping Oil Pollution Damages and Compensation

최용철
법학연구소 (The Institute of Legal Studies Konkuk University)|2013.06|일감법학 (Ilkam Law Review)|제25호|pp. 207-247|DOI 10.35148/ilsilr.2013..25.207

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

손해배상직접청구권선박유류오염선박강제보험중국유류오염배상

초록

There are two international legal systems with respect to oil pollution damages and compensations of oil ship; ‘International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damages(CLC) in 1992’ and ‘International Convention on the Establishment of International Fund for Compensation of Oil Pollution of Oil Pollution Damage(IOPC FUND) in 1992’. China is the member of ‘CLC in 1992’. On the other hand, Hong Kong takes part in the other organization ‘IOPC FUND in 1992’. As a result of different membership, China could not request compensation to IOPC FUND for damages which exceed restricted liability of ship owner. As of 1st of July,2013, Oil Pollution Fund was launched in IOPC FUND, which compensates RMB 30million per accident of ship oil pollution in maximum as a second compensator. On the contrary to Korea, China has no single-law governing maritime issues, however there are various laws regulating oil pollution damages and compensations. Foreign ships and some sort of domestic ships are subjects to CLC in 1992 charter. On the other hand, the other domestic ships beyond CLC regualtions must be subject to the Chinese domestic regulations. A ship owner bears unconditional duties on the basis of Marine Environment Protection Law, and its limit of liability should be determined by Marine Law. Compulsory insurance is to be done under Ship Marine Environment Pollution Protection Management Regulation. China needs to improve legal system by unifying regulations regarding the oil damage and compensation. Considering China’s actual condition, it must be formed as an independent law such as “Shipping Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Act”. It can be also considered to improve Chinese Marine Law imitating and reflecting other countries’ laws like “Oil Pollution Act” of U.S and “Oil Pollution Damages Security Act” of Korea.

Abstract

There are two international legal systems with respect to oil pollution damages and compensations of oil ship; ‘International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damages(CLC) in 1992’ and ‘International Convention on the Establishment of International Fund for Compensation of Oil Pollution of Oil Pollution Damage(IOPC FUND) in 1992’. China is the member of ‘CLC in 1992’. On the other hand, Hong Kong takes part in the other organization ‘IOPC FUND in 1992’. As a result of different membership, China could not request compensation to IOPC FUND for damages which exceed restricted liability of ship owner. As of 1st of July,2013, Oil Pollution Fund was launched in IOPC FUND, which compensates RMB 30million per accident of ship oil pollution in maximum as a second compensator. On the contrary to Korea, China has no single-law governing maritime issues, however there are various laws regulating oil pollution damages and compensations. Foreign ships and some sort of domestic ships are subjects to CLC in 1992 charter. On the other hand, the other domestic ships beyond CLC regualtions must be subject to the Chinese domestic regulations. A ship owner bears unconditional duties on the basis of Marine Environment Protection Law, and its limit of liability should be determined by Marine Law. Compulsory insurance is to be done under Ship Marine Environment Pollution Protection Management Regulation. China needs to improve legal system by unifying regulations regarding the oil damage and compensation. Considering China’s actual condition, it must be formed as an independent law such as “Shipping Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Act”. It can be also considered to improve Chinese Marine Law imitating and reflecting other countries’ laws like “Oil Pollution Act” of U.S and “Oil Pollution Damages Security Act” of Korea.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 김인현, "해상법" (2011), 법문사
  2. 경익수, "중국의 유탁손해배상제도에 관한 연구", 한국해법학회지, 31(1), pp.339~358 (2009), 한국해법학회
  3. 경익수, "중국의 해양환경보호법제에 관한 연구", 한국해법학회지, 29(2), pp.379~401 (2007), 한국해법학회
  4. 김인현, "2009개정 유류오염손해배상보장법의 주요내용과 시사점", 추계학술대회, pp.1~14 (2010), 한국해사법학회
  5. 박세민, "책임보험상의 직접청구권을 둘러싼 법적논점에 관한 고찰", 안암법학, (27), pp.497~540 (2008), 안암법학회
  6. 이승우, "해양유류오염손해배상ㆍ보상제도", 환경법연구, 30(1), pp.163~188 (2008), 한국환경법학회
  7. 최용철, "선박유오사고손해배상 및 보상에 관한 연구 : 한·중 손해배상 및 보상비교를 중심으로", 석사, 법학, pp.2011
  8. 康 丹, "船舶油污損害的賠償主體的硏究", 金卡工程, (3), pp.83~87 (2009), 上海海事大學 法學院 經濟与法
  9. 高 霏, "关于沿海非涉外船舶油污損害賠償适用法律相关问题的硏 究", 广东交通職業技術學院學报, (4), pp.80~91 (2006), 上海海事大學
  10. 高 霏, "关于沿海船舶油污損害賠償相关问题的硏究", 석사, 國際法學, pp.2008
  11. 霍艷偉, "論船舶油污損害賠償主體", 法制與社會, (31), pp.258~259 (2010), 上海海事大學法學 院
  12. 罗 迅, "对船舶油污損害賠償问题的思考", 航海技术, (3), pp.70~71 (2003), 秦皇岛海事局
  13. 駱 利, "海岸帶環境保護示範區建設指標體系硏究", 석사, pp.2002
  14. 賴惠燕, "關于建立我国船舶油汚損害賠償机制問題硏究", 中國水運, (2), pp.189~191 (2006), 海洋大學法學院
  15. 赖惠燕, "船舶油污損害之純經濟損失賠償问题硏究", 海洋开发与管理, (6), pp.104~107 (2006), 中國海洋大學法學院 中國海洋大學规划建 设处
  16. 唐曉春, "設立船舶油污損害賠償責任限制基金的法律適用", 金卡工 程, (11), pp.144~148 (2010), 上海海事大學
  17. 唐 华, "論我國船舶油汚損害賠償的法律適用", 科技信息, (14), pp.4~6 (2007), 上海海事 大學交通運輸學院
  18. 吕 航, "油污損害将获充分賠償", 中國船检, (8), pp.16~18 (2002), China Ship Survey
  19. 梅 宏, "船舶溢油应急反应机制的资金保障制度研究", 中国海洋大学 法政学院, (15), pp.90~98 (2010), 潍坊学院法学院
  20. 徐国平, "我國船舶油污損害賠償法律制度构想", 中國水運, (11), pp.253~256 (2006), 上海海事 大學
  21. 孙永卫, "論國内船舶溢油污染損害賠償中的法律问题", 中國水運, (1), pp.233~234 (2008), 烟 台海事局指挥中心
  22. 宋偉莉, "論受害人對船舶油汚責任保險人的直接請求權－兼談 ‘中華 人民共和國海事訴訟特別程序法’ 第97條的立法完善", 中國 海商法年刊, (4), pp.69~73 (2009), 广州海事法院
  23. 楊志祥, "船舶油汚損害賠償責任限制的國際立法及對我國之借鑑", 社 會科學版, (3), pp.58~60 (2004), 北京理工大學
  24. 吳 昊, "論我國船舶油污損害賠償法律制度的完善", 江蘇科技大學學 報, (1), pp.26~30 (2010), 揚州海事局
  25. 吴晓敏, "船舶油污損害的賠償范围", 社会科學版, (3), pp.346~349 (2004), 武汉理工大學
  26. 汪麗華, "船舶油污損害賠償法律制度硏究", 석사, pp.2006
  27. 王玫黎, "國家在船舶油污損害賠償的义務主體探讨", 學海, (2), pp.156~160 (2008), Academia Bimestris
  28. 王玫黎, "論我國船舶油污損害賠償的归責原则", 西南民族大學學报, (7), pp.226~230 (2008), 西南政法大學經貿法學院 人文社科版
  29. 王玫黎, "船舶油污損害賠償法律制度硏究", 박사, pp.2007
  30. 王 璠, "船舶油污損害賠償的法律適用", 中國海事, (5), pp.35~38 (2006), 上海海事大 學交通運输學院
  31. 袁基祖, "船舶污染强制责任保险法律制度研究", 석사, pp.2011
  32. 劉 雅, "論我國船舶油污損害賠償的法律適用", 金卡工程, (11), pp.131~ (2010), 上海海事 大學 經濟與法
  33. 李 敏, "論船舶油污責任强制保險制度的完善", 珠江水運, (6), pp.34~36 (2004), 上海 海運學院
  34. 易傳劍, "論船舶油污損害賠償範圍的法律界定－兼論環境侵權賠償過 程中的利益衡量", 紹興文理學院學報, (2), pp.22~25 (2010), 浙江大學光華法學院
  35. 李 茜, "海上船舶油污損害賠償法律问题硏究", 석사, pp.2007
  36. 李晓盛, "关于我國船舶油污損害賠償中的强制責任保險制度探析", 資 治文摘, (1), pp.167~ (2009), 深圳市公安局宝安派出所
  37. 張望平, "對船舶油污損害賠償法律制度建設的思考", 重慶科技學院 學報, (3), pp.70~84 (2010), 西北政法大學國際法學院 社會科學
  38. 张 明, "石油运输对我国海洋污染的分析与对策", 中国环境管理, (25), pp.38~ (2011), 福 建交通职业技术学院
  39. 田 原, "論沿海運输船舶油污損害的賠償主體", 金卡工程, (3), pp.96~102 (2009), 上海海事 大學法學院 經濟与法
  40. 鄭雪飛, "我國海上船舶油污損害賠償範圍法律規則探析", 中國水運, (4), pp.70~87 (2010), 遼寧海事局法規處
  41. 赵 爽, "对建立我國船舶污染損害賠償机制的探讨", 天津航 海, (1), pp.42~44 (2009), 天津海事局
  42. 曹艳梅, "論船舶油污損害賠償主體制度", 석사, pp.2008
  43. 陈克宇, "船舶溢油事故与油污損害賠償法律制度", 中國船检, (3), pp.82~84 (2005), China Ship Survey
  44. 邹 鸰, "我國沿海運输船舶油污損害賠償的法律适用－兼评‘闽燃供2 轮’案件审理", 山西財經大學學报, (S2), pp.105~106 (2008), 集美大學航海學院 高等教 育版
  45. 韩洪蕾, "我國船舶油污損害賠償机制硏究", 海洋开发与管理, (2), pp.73~76 (2007), 中國海 洋大學
  46. "연합뉴스"[URL]
  47. "4. 19"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

중국의 유탁손해배상제도에 관한 연구경익수한국해법학회 · 한국해법학회지2009 · 제31권 제1호유류오염손해배상보장법의 법적 문제점에 관한 연구박영준한국경영법률학회 · 경영법률2011 · 제21권 제2호Legal Framework of Compensation for Vessel-Source Oil Pollution Damage in China정대, 학회연한중법학회 · 중국법연구2017 · 제30권 현행 IOPC 국제기금협약 체계하에서 유류오염손해배상에 관한 우리나라 내부의 문제점에 대한 분석박세민한국해법학회 · 한국해법학회지2011 · 제33권 제2호中國의 船舶油汚 損害賠償 法律制度(한국어 번역)于耀？, 朴英姬한국상사판례학회 · 상사판례연구2006 · 제19권 제4호우리나라 유류오염손해보상기금 설치를 위한 기초연구목진용한국해사법학회 · 해사법연구2010 · 제22권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

현행 중소기업규제체계에 대한 소고김병연pp. 3-47국내 커버드본드(Covered Bond) 법률의 제정과 검토 과제김효연pp. 49-95독일 실정법상 ‘인적 결합체’에 대한 고찰과 시사점유주선pp. 97-120위험사회에서 형법을 통한 위험조종의 가능성과 한계 －위험형법과 적대형법을 중심으로－김재윤pp. 123-160해외진출 한국기업의 인권침해에 대한 책임구성 고찰김병준pp. 161-206
원문 보기