본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

유류오염손해배상보장법의 법적 문제점에 관한 연구

A Study on the Legal Problems of the Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Guarantee Ac

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Korea has ratified the 1969/1992 International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage(CLC), the 1971/1992 International Convention on the Establishment of International Fund for Compensation of Oil Pollution Damage(FC), the 2003 Supplementary Fund Convention(SFC) and 2001 International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage(Bunkers). Therefore, the above International Conventions have become effective in Korea without the need to legislate a separate act to enforce the same. Despite the foregoing, however, Korea enacted the Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Guarantee Act to enforce the above International Conventions. In enacting the Act, Korea did not adopt the contents of the above International Conventions, but slightly modified the same. The discrepancies between the Four International Conventions and Korean Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Guarantee Act has caused some legal problems. In this paper, I make clear the difference between Four International Conventions(CLC, FC, SFC and Bunkers) and 2009 Revised Korean Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Guarantee Act and I express my opinions on some legal issues.

Abstract

Korea has ratified the 1969/1992 International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage(CLC), the 1971/1992 International Convention on the Establishment of International Fund for Compensation of Oil Pollution Damage(FC), the 2003 Supplementary Fund Convention(SFC) and 2001 International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage(Bunkers). Therefore, the above International Conventions have become effective in Korea without the need to legislate a separate act to enforce the same. Despite the foregoing, however, Korea enacted the Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Guarantee Act to enforce the above International Conventions. In enacting the Act, Korea did not adopt the contents of the above International Conventions, but slightly modified the same. The discrepancies between the Four International Conventions and Korean Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Guarantee Act has caused some legal problems. In this paper, I make clear the difference between Four International Conventions(CLC, FC, SFC and Bunkers) and 2009 Revised Korean Oil Pollution Damage Compensation Guarantee Act and I express my opinions on some legal issues.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김인현, "해상법 제2판" (2007), 법문사
  2. 박영준, "해상유류오염의 손해배상에 관한 고찰", 중앙법학, 10(3), pp.173~212 (2008), 중앙법학회
  3. 박영준, "개정유류오염손해배상보장법에 관한 고찰", 경영법률, 19(4), pp.379~404 (2009), 한국경영법률학회
  4. 윤효영, "유류오염손해배상책임에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2002
  5. 최종현, "해상법상론" (2009), 박영사
  6. 최종현, "유류오염손해배상보장법의 개정방향", 한국해법학회지, 28(1), pp.113~136 (2006), 한국해법학회
  7. 해양오염방제조합, "해양오염방제사례집" (2004)
  8. "Arnould, Law of Marine Insurance and Average" (1981), Stevens
  9. J. Kenneth Goodacre, "Marine Insurance Claims" (1996), Witherby
  10. IMO, "Status of Multilateral Conventions And Instruments" (2010)
  11. Annual Report, "IOPC Fund", ~ (2009)
  12. IOPC Fund, "Claim Manual", ~ (2008)
  13. IOPC Fund, "Liability and Compensation for Oil Pollution Damage", Texts of the 1992 Conventions and the Supplementary Fund Protocol (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)