현행 공공기관운영법상 공공기관지정제도의 개선방안에 대한 연구
A Study on the Designation Clause of Public Institutions -Focusing on Article 4 & 5 of the Act on the Management of Public Institutions-
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses how to improve the legal provisions related to the designation of public institutions which are applied to the Act on the Management of Public Institutions (hereinafter referred to as the “Public Management Act”). In this regard, other country cases on the legislation and application of the management system of public institutions are reviewed,and Korea’s historical changes and experiences in the management system of public institutions are studied. The Public Management Act, enacted in 2007, stipulates that the Minister of Strategy and Finance may designate public institutions applied to the Act and shall classify public institutions into the categories of public corporation,quasi-governmental institution, and non-classified public institution for designation purpose. However, the Public Management Act does not state clearly the criteria for determining which institutions to include in the scope of application and category. This study argues that unclarity in designating public institutions could violate the principle of “rule of law” and it’s not hopeful for enhancing transparency in the management of public institutions. Furthermore, it gives rise to disputes between the Ministry of Strategy and Finance and the competent agency or relevant institution every year whenever the Minister of Strategy and Finance shall newly designate public institutions, cancel the designation thereof or designate such public institutions by changing the classification according to the Public Management Act. In order to resolve the existing problems in the legal system, this study proposes the need for revising the designation clause of public institutions in the Public Management Act, i.e., provisions regarding designation procedures of public institutions in the scope of application should be abolished and the requirements of public institutions applied to the Act be clarified in the Public Management Act to enhance transparency in applying and operating the Act.
Abstract
This paper discusses how to improve the legal provisions related to the designation of public institutions which are applied to the Act on the Management of Public Institutions (hereinafter referred to as the “Public Management Act”). In this regard, other country cases on the legislation and application of the management system of public institutions are reviewed,and Korea’s historical changes and experiences in the management system of public institutions are studied. The Public Management Act, enacted in 2007, stipulates that the Minister of Strategy and Finance may designate public institutions applied to the Act and shall classify public institutions into the categories of public corporation,quasi-governmental institution, and non-classified public institution for designation purpose. However, the Public Management Act does not state clearly the criteria for determining which institutions to include in the scope of application and category. This study argues that unclarity in designating public institutions could violate the principle of “rule of law” and it’s not hopeful for enhancing transparency in the management of public institutions. Furthermore, it gives rise to disputes between the Ministry of Strategy and Finance and the competent agency or relevant institution every year whenever the Minister of Strategy and Finance shall newly designate public institutions, cancel the designation thereof or designate such public institutions by changing the classification according to the Public Management Act. In order to resolve the existing problems in the legal system, this study proposes the need for revising the designation clause of public institutions in the Public Management Act, i.e., provisions regarding designation procedures of public institutions in the scope of application should be abolished and the requirements of public institutions applied to the Act be clarified in the Public Management Act to enhance transparency in applying and operating the Act.
참고문헌 (17)
- 국민의 정부 공공개혁백서, "기획예산처", ~ (2002)
- 2008∼2010 공공기관 선진화 백서, "기획재정부", ~ (2011)
- 기획재정부, "공공기관 운영관련 법령 지침", ~ (2011)
- 김동희, "행정법(Ⅰ), (Ⅱ)" (2009), 박영사
- 김명식, "특수법인론" (2005), 한국학술정보(주)
- 김철수, "헌법학신론" (2010), 박영사
- 공공법인 관련 법제의 정비 및 개선방안 연구, "이준우", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2007)
- 우리나라 준공공부문의 실태분석 및 혁신방안, "전국경제인연합회", ~ (2009)
- 주요국의 공공기관 (Ⅰ), (Ⅱ), "한국조세연구원", ~ (2010)
- 홍정선, "행정법원론 (상), (하)" (2004), 박영사
- 현대적 관리주의에 의한 공공기관 경영관리의 방향, In 공공기관과 국가정책, "박석희", 한국조세연구원, ~ (2010)
- 공공기관지정 및 분류체계 개선방안, "박정수", 한국조세연구원, 공공기관정책연구센터, ~ (2010)
- 성명재, "우리나라 공공기관의 GDP 비중 추정", 재정학연구, 4(2), pp.151~182 (2011), 한국재정학회
- 성승제, "공공기관의 운영에 관한 법률", 비교법적 연구 (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 기획예산처, "공공기관 운영시스템 개편" (2007)
- 공공기관 현황조사, "기획예산처", ~ (2007)
- Cabinet Office, "Categories of Public Bodies: A Guide for Departments", ~ (2011)
