본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선의 ‘북방권’ 무역을 통한 경제협력 네트워크 강화과정

The Process of Strengthening Network for Economic Cooperation of Chosun and ‘the Northern Region of the Empire’ through the Trade

송규진
역사연구소 (The Institute for the Study of History)|2012.05|史叢(사총) (SA-CHONG(sa))|제76호|pp. 1-30|DOI 10.16957/sa..76.201205.1

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

대동아공영권Trade무역경제협력Economic Cooperation‘북방권’대륙전진병참기지The Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere‘The Northern Region of the Empire’The forward logistical base in the continent

초록

The concept of ‘the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere’ is comprised of ‘the southern region of the empire’ and ‘the northern region of the empire’ under the readership of Japanese government. During the Pacific War, the southern region was considered as a main concern, while ‘the northern region of the empire’ was still strategically important to accomplish the war against China. The Government-General of Chosun regarded Chosun as a crucial position to furnish supplies for the Sino-Japanese War and tried to consolidate the network of economic cooperation within ‘the northern region of the empire’ with Chosun as the center. When the arterial road connecting main land of Japan, Chosun and the continent was established, the inland of Chosun was considered the trunk of the continental root of ‘the northern region of the empire’ containing the East Sea and the Yellow Sea as well as Korean Peninsula. Customs business was simplified and gradually abolished to build up the foundation institutionally. However, the imports and exports of Chosun were mostly limited within ‘the northern region of the empire’. Japanese government regulated institutions through a trade control organization and empathized to collaborate with a more reinforced export institution. The Essential reason for Chosun to reinforce the economic cooperate was to provide conveniences for the Japanese army stationed in the continent. All these efforts were realized in the trade with ‘the northern region of the empire’, which increased continuously during the war and took a great deal of weight in the whole imports and exports. The trade with ‘the northern region of the empire’ could have improved due to the role at Chosun as the forward logistical base in the continent to furnish supplies without the internal factor of industrial development. The economic cooperate network of that period had been enhanced not under the economic factor but under political and strategic reason.

Abstract

The concept of ‘the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere’ is comprised of ‘the southern region of the empire’ and ‘the northern region of the empire’ under the readership of Japanese government. During the Pacific War, the southern region was considered as a main concern, while ‘the northern region of the empire’ was still strategically important to accomplish the war against China. The Government-General of Chosun regarded Chosun as a crucial position to furnish supplies for the Sino-Japanese War and tried to consolidate the network of economic cooperation within ‘the northern region of the empire’ with Chosun as the center. When the arterial road connecting main land of Japan, Chosun and the continent was established, the inland of Chosun was considered the trunk of the continental root of ‘the northern region of the empire’ containing the East Sea and the Yellow Sea as well as Korean Peninsula. Customs business was simplified and gradually abolished to build up the foundation institutionally. However, the imports and exports of Chosun were mostly limited within ‘the northern region of the empire’. Japanese government regulated institutions through a trade control organization and empathized to collaborate with a more reinforced export institution. The Essential reason for Chosun to reinforce the economic cooperate was to provide conveniences for the Japanese army stationed in the continent. All these efforts were realized in the trade with ‘the northern region of the empire’, which increased continuously during the war and took a great deal of weight in the whole imports and exports. The trade with ‘the northern region of the empire’ could have improved due to the role at Chosun as the forward logistical base in the continent to furnish supplies without the internal factor of industrial development. The economic cooperate network of that period had been enhanced not under the economic factor but under political and strategic reason.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. 김경일, "제국의 시대와 동아시아 연대" (2011), 창비
  2. 鈴木武雄, "朝鮮經濟の新構想", pp.71~122 (1942), 東洋經濟新報社
  3. 朴慶植, "朝鮮人强制連行の記錄" (1965), 未來社
  4. 김대상, "일제하 강제인력수탈사" (1973), 정음사
  5. 허수열, "조선인 노동력의 강제동원의 실태 - 조선내에서의 강제동원정책의 전개를 중심으로, In 일제의 한국 식민통치" (1985), 정음사
  6. 海野福壽, "朝鮮の勞務動員, In 近代日本と植民地 5" (1995), 岩波書店
  7. 곽건홍, "일제의 노동정책과 조선노동자(1938~1945)" (2001), 신서원
  8. 안자코유카, "총동원체제하 조선인 노동력 ‘강제동원’ 정책의 전개", 韓國史學報, 14, pp.10~348 (2003), 고려사학회
  9. 이상의, "일제하 조선의 노동정책 연구" (2006), 혜안
  10. 鄭泰憲, "일제의 경제정책과 조선사회 -조세정책을 중심으로-" (1996), 역사비평사
  11. 김인호, "태평양전쟁기 조선공업연구" (1998), 신서원
  12. 허영란, "전시체제기(1937~1945)생활필수품 통제 연구", 國史館論叢, 88 (2000)
  13. 河元鎬, "일제말 통제경제정책과 물가통제", 대동문화연구, (54), pp.121~152 (2006), 대동문화연구원
  14. 송규진, "일제말(1937~1945) 통제경제정책과 실행과정 -매일신보를 중심으로", 역사학연구, (42), pp.141~175 (2011), 호남사학회
  15. 방기중, "일제 파시시즘 지배정책과 민중생활" (2004), 혜안
  16. 방기중, "일제하 지식인의 파시즘체제 인식과 대응" (2005), 혜안
  17. 송규진, "일제하 ‘선만관계’와 ‘선만일여론’", 한국사연구, (146), pp.245~278 (2009), 한국사연구회
  18. 임성모, "중일전쟁 전야 만주국·조선 관계사의 소묘 ― ‘日滿一體’와 ‘鮮滿一如’의 갈등 ―", 역사학보, (201), pp.165~202 (2009), 역사학회
  19. 송규진, "중･일전쟁시기 조선무역협회의 조선무역에 대한 인식과 그 실상", 韓國史學報, (10) (2001), 고려사학회
  20. 김명섭, "동아시아 냉전질서의 탄생-‘극동’의 부정과 ‘대동아’의 온존, In 동아시아의 지역질서-제국을 넘어 공동체로", pp.276~ (2005), 창비
  21. 全國經濟調査機關聯合會朝鮮支部, "朝鮮經濟年報", 改造社, 308~309 (1942)
  22. 鈴木武雄, "朝鮮の經濟", pp.298~ (1941), 日本評論社
  23. 小林英夫, "‘大東亞共榮圈’の形成と崩壞", pp.66~78 (1975), 御茶の水書房
  24. "日滿實業協會 京城에서 定總開催", 매일신보, ~ (1938)
  25. 송규진, "1930년대 이후 조선의 대중국 무역", 동양학, (39), pp.93~116 (2006), 동양학연구원
  26. 堀和生, "1930年代 社會的 分業의 再編成-京畿道･京城府 의 分析을 통하여-, In 近代朝鮮工業化의 硏究" (1993), 一潮閣
  27. 川合彰武, "鮮滿一如より大陸一如へ", 朝鮮行政, pp.7~ (1942)
  28. 정재정, "일제침략과 한국철도(1892~1945년)" (1999), 서울대학교출판부
  29. 임채성, "중일전쟁과 화북교통" (2012), 일조각
  30. 殖産局商工課, "鮮滿一如の經濟的施設に付て", 朝鮮, 265, pp.172~173 (1937)
  31. "鮮滿一如の說", 朝鮮及滿洲, 354, pp.12~ (1937), 朝鮮及滿洲社
  32. "鐵道新線敷設에도 鮮滿一如精神高潮", 每日申報, ~ (1937)
  33. "第三鮮滿一如線開通", 在滿朝鮮人通信, 71, pp.49~ (1939), 興亞協會
  34. "鮮滿一如の紐帶‘滿浦線’開通", 朝鮮, 294, pp.86~ (1939)
  35. 澁谷禮治, "朝鮮貿易と近狀と其の助長發展策", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 34, pp.5~ (1939)
  36. 송규진, "日帝下의 朝鮮貿易 硏究", pp.172~174 (2001), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원
  37. "鮮滿直通列車に依り鮮滿兩地內稅關所在地向輸送物品の稅關寺務簡捷化", 朝鮮貿易, 2, pp.13~ (1943), 朝鮮東亞貿易柱式會社 總務課
  38. "國境地方に於ける輸出入特例", 朝鮮貿易, 3, pp.23~ (1943)
  39. "朝鮮總督府官報", ~ (1944)
  40. "朝鮮總督府 帝國議會說明資料 9", pp.292~293 (1994), 不二出版
  41. 澁谷禮治, "朝鮮貿易と近狀と其の助長發展策", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 34, pp.6~ (1939)
  42. 朝鮮貿易協會, "朝鮮貿易史", pp.194~ (1943)
  43. "朝鮮貿易 2", 36~50 (1943)
  44. "對關･滿･支輸出入物資の價格調整に就いて", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 55, pp.2~3 (1940)
  45. "朝鮮の交易機構整備", 朝鮮貿易, 4, pp.19~ (1943)
  46. 송규잔, "일제하 조선과 만주국의 무역에 관한 연구", 中國學報 (2005), 韓國中國學會
  47. "北支朝鮮物産出張者報告座談會", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 20, pp.43~57 (1937)
  48. "在北支朝鮮關係者座談會", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 24, pp.14~30 (1938)
  49. "朝鮮貿易協會通報 44", 39~40 (1939)
  50. "貿易調査硏究會の開催", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 36, pp.52~ (1939)
  51. "朝鮮對芝罘貿易懇談會 1", 朝鮮貿易, 2, pp.51~ (1943)
  52. 中村資良, "朝鮮銀行會社要錄", pp.497~ (1942), 東亞經濟時報社
  53. "對蒙疆貿易 新會社設立認可 大興貿易設立코 獨占", 東亞日報, ~ (1939)
  54. "第三回鮮蒙交易打合會開催", 朝鮮貿易, 7, pp.14~ (1943)
  55. 이승렬, "1930년대 朝鮮의 수출증가와 朝鮮工業界의 동향, In 金容燮敎授停年紀念 韓國史學論叢3 韓國近現代의 民族問題와 新國家建設" (1997), 지식산업사
  56. "鮮滿貿易經濟懇談會竝に朝鮮物産見本市の槪況", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 80 (1942)
  57. 西本計三, "時局と朝鮮の商工業", 朝鮮, 274, pp.23~ (1938)
  58. 澁谷禮治, "朝鮮貿易の新政勢と發展對策", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 46, pp.5~ (1940)
  59. "貿易調査硏究座談會", 朝鮮貿易協會通報, 25, pp.21~ (1938)

관련 논문AI추천

중일전쟁 시기 淪陷區 대외무역과 무역 네트워크의 변화박정현호서사학회 · 역사와 담론2011 · 제58호1940년대 전반 일본의 동북아지역 정치경제 인식 -동아광역경제론을 중심으로-송병권역사연구소 · 史叢(사총)2013 · 제80호일제하 韓日 무역 네트워크 형성의 한 樣相 -1920, 30년대 초 견직물 무역업계의 사례-홍성찬국학연구원 · 동방학지2009 · 제145호중일전쟁 시기 조선의 대 제삼국 무역정책과 무역실상송규진민족문화연구원 · 민족문화연구2005 · 제43호세계경제공황 전후 ‘영제국경제회의’와 조선의 對 ‘영제국권’ 무역송규진호서사학회 · 역사와 담론2010 · 제56호1930년대 동해횡단항로와 조선총독부 해운정책하지영인문사회과학연구소 · 인문사회과학연구2020 · 제21권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

1930년 전후 이여성의 약소민족운동 연구와 민족해방운동론신용균pp. 31-60미국의 동아시아 진출과 동해김하영pp. 61-96‘평화선’ 획정 과정의 논리 전개와 그 성격신용옥pp. 97-142淸代의 土地典賣 관행과 법령 - 乾隆18年 條例를 중심으로허혜윤pp. 143-164廣東 13行과 개항의 기억이은자pp. 165-192
원문 보기