본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중화주의의 극복과 역사인식의 변화 - 柳寅植의 大東史 를 중심으로 -

Overcoming Sinocentrism and Changein the Historical View with being seen from Daedongsa(大東史) by Yu Insik(柳寅植)

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Daedongsa is the complete history book written in chronological order by Yu Insik(1865~1928) in the early period under the Japanese rule. Yu Insik, a reform-minded Confucian scholar, whose pen name was Dongsan lived in Andong. Daedongsa covers from the ancient times until the writer's time according to Dangun Jeongtongron instead of the existing Dangi Jeongtongron. Yu Insik understood the period from so-called Gija Joseon to Silla as the period of South and North dynasties, not with the view of Gija Jeongtongron and Silla Jeongtongron. He sublated Gija Jeongtongron and Gija Bujeongron, and established 'Gija Joseon as South dynasty and Buyeo as North dynasty'. It means that his writing overcame Sinocentrism's historical view and paid attention not to lean toward extreme nationalism. He also overcame the contradiction in the writing of Balhae's history with Silla Jeongtongron by writing 'Silla as South dynasty and Balhae as North dynasty' Daedongsa's writing mode took over the historiographical tradition of the Korean Empire, on the other side its contents showed the early from of nationalism historiography.

Abstract

Daedongsa is the complete history book written in chronological order by Yu Insik(1865~1928) in the early period under the Japanese rule. Yu Insik, a reform-minded Confucian scholar, whose pen name was Dongsan lived in Andong. Daedongsa covers from the ancient times until the writer's time according to Dangun Jeongtongron instead of the existing Dangi Jeongtongron. Yu Insik understood the period from so-called Gija Joseon to Silla as the period of South and North dynasties, not with the view of Gija Jeongtongron and Silla Jeongtongron. He sublated Gija Jeongtongron and Gija Bujeongron, and established 'Gija Joseon as South dynasty and Buyeo as North dynasty'. It means that his writing overcame Sinocentrism's historical view and paid attention not to lean toward extreme nationalism. He also overcame the contradiction in the writing of Balhae's history with Silla Jeongtongron by writing 'Silla as South dynasty and Balhae as North dynasty' Daedongsa's writing mode took over the historiographical tradition of the Korean Empire, on the other side its contents showed the early from of nationalism historiography.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 하우봉, "이익, In 한국의 역사가와 역사학", pp.243~ (1994), 창비
  2. 韓永愚, "17세기후반~18세기초 洪萬宗의 會通思想과 歷史意識", 韓國文化, 12, pp.405~ (1991)
  3. 김종복, "서구학문의 유입과 동아시아 지성의 변모", pp.47~49 (2012), 선인
  4. 김종복, "중화질서의 와해와 유교적 사유체계의 변동 ― 개항기 역사서의 발해사 서술을 중심으로 ―", 아시아문화연구, 26, pp.1~33 (2012), 아시아문화연구소
  5. 金喜坤, "東山柳寅植의 생애와 독립운동", 한국근현대사연구, 7 (1997)
  6. 박걸순, "시대의 선각자 혁신 유림 류인식" (2009), 지식산업사
  7. 東山先生紀念事業會, "東山文稿, In 東山全書", pp.31~ (1978), 東山先生紀念事業會
  8. 단재신채호전집편찬위원회, "단재 신채호 전집", pp.344~345 (2007), 독립기념관한국독립운동사연구소
  9. 宋贊植, "解題 大東史", 東山全書, 8~
  10. 朴杰淳, "東山柳寅植의 歷史認識, In 植民地시기의 歷史學과 歷史認識" (2004), 景仁文化社
  11. 朴杰淳, "解題(祖國精神・國粹論・南北朝史觀으로 민족사를 통찰한 大東史 ), In 大東史" (2006), 韓國國學振興院
  12. 徐永大, "한말의 檀君運動과 大倧敎", 韓國史硏究, 114, pp.229~231 (2001)
  13. 大東歷史敍(鄭喬), "大東歷史, In 대한계년사", pp.38~ (2004), 소명출판
  14. "大東史", pp.9~ (2006), 韓國國學振興院
  15. 金敎獻, "神壇民史", ~
  16. 韓永愚, "韓國民族主義歷史學", pp.97~ (1994), 一潮閣
  17. 崔惠珠, "滄江金澤榮의 韓國史論", 한울아카데미, pp.158~206 (1996)
  18. "韓國歷代小史, In 韓國史學史資料大系", pp.34~ (1987), 民族文化社
  19. "東山文稿", 東山全書, 120~121
  20. "舊唐書", ~
  21. "資治通鑑", ~
  22. "日本三代實錄", ~
  23. "唐會要", ~
  24. 유인식, "太息錄", 98~99 (1928)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)