중화질서의 와해와 유교적 사유체계의 변동 ― 개항기 역사서의 발해사 서술을 중심으로 ―

Abstract

Twenty kinds of Korean history books during the early modern times adhered to legitimacy of certain dynasties’ continuity[‘Jeongtongron’] and shared Neo-Confucianism’s historical consciousness by counting a king’s reign period from the next year when the king ascended the throne. Jeongtongron which had been the feature of historical studies in the middle age showed duplicity of its reinforcement and shake in the road into the modern times. Namely, Dangi Jeongtongron was reinforced as the evidence of independence, while Silla Jeongtongron was shaken because of Balhae’s history. With the point of medieval Jeongtongron, history books during the early modern times aimed at meeting the foundation of modern independent nation. Traditional historical books written in classical Chinese writing could not overcome their limit in the point of medieval thoughts, even though they reached high standard in the contents. However, as far as Balhae’s history was concerned, writing of Dongsajipryak, Deadongyeoksa, and Yeoksajipryak affected View of northern and southern(Nambookgookron) countries during 1920s.