사회복지시설 종사자들의 처우와노무관리상의 문제점

Abstract

The rising demand of social welfare by social change and the number of employees in social welfare facilities are increasing as the function and part of social welfare facilities grow importance. The working condition problems of the employees arise consistently and problems for nature of workers and users appear because comprehensive command supervision relations come into existence between consignment organization and fiduciary organization as many welfare affairs become contracting out from the nation and the local autonomous entity. The law for improving treatment and position of social workers is necessary to establish as a unifying and comprehensive law that can be applied in various similar institutions that work in various contracting out institutions. The current law has much to be desired to function as an improving treatment and position law. Especially when it comes to the wages, there is an obligation that making an effort to reach the salary level of public social workers, so the law can’t be materialized or lacks effectiveness. Therefore, the law should be reformed. And the systematic complement under the social insurance act is needed by succession problems of employment and the instability of employment relationship following the contract termination from the fiduciary organization or change to the other organization. Also, there is a suggestion based on the advised criteria about the salary level of the workers, the personnel expenses guideline of the employees every year according to the treatment problems. But, it needs to be instituted a reasonable standard of establishment, because it is necessary to review the propriety of comparative position system of public servant that is a comparative measurement tool applied in the guideline. There is an immanent limitation that is not easy to decide the working conditions on an equal footing through collective bargaining, because the workers in social welfare field take the institution assessment to decide consignments regularly. Therefore, a system about reasonable compensation decision need to be established. Finally, the problem of legal interpretation in choosing public institutions is reviewing.