이이의 經世論의 성립과 그 정치적 배경
Yulgok(栗谷) Yi I(李珥)’s Statecraft Theory and its Political Setting
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Roughly speaking, it’s said that Yi I’s ideas were composed of 2 parts. One was the philosophical, and the other was the political idea. Today, more light is shed on his philosophical idea. On the other hand, weak light is shed on his political ideas only through the lens called the Silhak(實學). However, his political idea, that is, the statecraft theory was his lifelong idea, and never forgot even before the Silhak redicovered his political idea. The Queen Munjeoong, who was the king Myeongjong's mother, was dead in 1565, which meant that the long political dark age was over in the end. For the age, the political role of the Salim(士林) was only to criticise the corrupt power elites. When the new age was begun, their role was dramatically changed. Now, they should proved that their ideas were right, and available. In a word, they got to need the statecraft in order to solve a lot of social problems that had been piled up for the ‘dark age’. However, the learning of Yi Hwang, which most Salim firmly had believed in, could not provide the political methodology unlike their expectation. In results, Yi I could use just 2 materials of his learning and the reality in order to make up his own statecraft. With regard to the statecraft theory, Yi I had the double tasks. One was to frame the available statecraft, and the other was to make his friends colleagues figure out his new theory. He succeeded in the first task to a considerable extent, but could not succeeded in the second task at all. Right after his death, officials and intellectuals of Joseon experienced Japanese Invasion of Kore(1592~1598), which was the long, and nation-wide war. For the wartime, they experienced the reality, and built up the statecraft experiences. In the process, they came to understand the Yi I's assertions, and the theory.
Abstract
Roughly speaking, it’s said that Yi I’s ideas were composed of 2 parts. One was the philosophical, and the other was the political idea. Today, more light is shed on his philosophical idea. On the other hand, weak light is shed on his political ideas only through the lens called the Silhak(實學). However, his political idea, that is, the statecraft theory was his lifelong idea, and never forgot even before the Silhak redicovered his political idea. The Queen Munjeoong, who was the king Myeongjong's mother, was dead in 1565, which meant that the long political dark age was over in the end. For the age, the political role of the Salim(士林) was only to criticise the corrupt power elites. When the new age was begun, their role was dramatically changed. Now, they should proved that their ideas were right, and available. In a word, they got to need the statecraft in order to solve a lot of social problems that had been piled up for the ‘dark age’. However, the learning of Yi Hwang, which most Salim firmly had believed in, could not provide the political methodology unlike their expectation. In results, Yi I could use just 2 materials of his learning and the reality in order to make up his own statecraft. With regard to the statecraft theory, Yi I had the double tasks. One was to frame the available statecraft, and the other was to make his friends colleagues figure out his new theory. He succeeded in the first task to a considerable extent, but could not succeeded in the second task at all. Right after his death, officials and intellectuals of Joseon experienced Japanese Invasion of Kore(1592~1598), which was the long, and nation-wide war. For the wartime, they experienced the reality, and built up the statecraft experiences. In the process, they came to understand the Yi I's assertions, and the theory.
참고문헌 (66)
- 천관우, "반계 유형원 연구(下)", 歷史學報, 3 (1952)
- 이성원, "李滉, 李珥 理氣論의 政治 社會的 性格에 관한 硏究 : 16세기 士禍, 黨爭에 대한 對應과 관련하여", 박사, pp.1998
- 이상익, "퇴계와 율곡의 정치에 대한 인식", 退溪學報, 110(1) (2001)
- 최진홍, "율곡 이기론의 정치적 해석 - 경학적 세계관의 경세론적 이해-", 율곡사상연구, 20, pp.86~122 (2010), (사)율곡학회
- "明宗實錄 卷32, 21년 4월 10일(辛未)", ~
- "明宗實錄 卷32, 21년 3월 17일(戊申)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷2, 1년 7월 12일(己未)", ~
- 이황, "宣祖修正實錄 卷2, 1년 8월 1일(戊寅)", ~
- "明宗實錄 卷31, 20년 4월 19일(乙酉)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷3, 2년 6월 1일(癸酉)", ~
- "明宗實錄 卷31, 20년 4월 19일(乙酉)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷1, 즉위년 8월 1일(癸未)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷2, 1년 12월 6일(庚辰)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷3, 2년 6월 1일(癸酉)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷9, 8년 6월 24일(辛卯)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷10, 9년 2월 1일(乙丑)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷3, 2년 6월 1일(癸酉)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷3, 2년 5월 21일(甲子)", ~
- "栗谷全書 卷3, 玉堂陳時弊疏(선조 2년)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷3, 2년 8월 16일(丁巳)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷4, 3년 12월 1일(甲午)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷6, 5년 7월 7일(庚寅)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷13, 12년 12월 1일(壬申)", ~
- "石潭日記 선조 즉위년 10월", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷6, 5년 11월 1일(癸未)", ~
- "石潭日記 선조 원년 10월", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷7, 6년 11월 5일(辛巳)", ~
- "石潭日記 선조 6년 10월", ~
- "石潭日記 선조 6년 11월 辛巳日", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷7, 6년 10월 12일(己未)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷7, 6년 10월 12일(己未)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷7, 6년 11월 26일(壬寅)", ~
- "石潭日記 선조 7년 정월", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷8, 7년 1월 1일(丁丑)", ~
- "栗谷全書 卷3, 諫院陳時事疏", ~
- "栗谷全書 卷15, 論當今之時勢", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷12, 11년 5월 1일(辛亥)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷3, 2년 5월 21일(甲子)", ~
- "石潭日記 선조 8년 정월", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷8, 7년 12월 1일(辛丑)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷8, 7년 3월 18일(癸巳)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷10, 9년 2월 1일(乙丑)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷11, 10년 9월 1일(甲寅)", ~
- 이정철, "대동법, 조선 최고의 개혁" (2010), 역사비평사
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷11, 10년 9월 1일(甲寅)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷26, 25년 4월 28일(丁巳))", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷12, 11년 11월 1일(戊申)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷13, 12년 2월 1일(丙子)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷13, 12년 5월 1일(乙巳) (辭大司諫兼陳洗滌東西疏)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷13, 12년 2월 1일(丙子)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷13, 12년 6월 8일(壬午)", ~
- "石潭日記 선조 14년 4월", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷15, 14년 4월 1일(甲午)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷13, 12년 4월 1일(丙子", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷13, 12년 12월 1일(壬申)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷4, 3년 11월 1일(乙丑)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷15, 14년 5월 24일(丙戌)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷15, 14년 1월 26일(辛卯)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷15, 14년 5월 24일(丙戌)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷16, 15년 9월 1일(丙辰)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷15, 14년 5월 24일(丙戌)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷17, 16년 4월 1일(壬子)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷17, 16년 2월 15일(戊戌)", ~
- "宣祖實錄 卷17, 16년 7월 19일(戊戌)", ~
- "宣祖修正實錄 卷17, 16년(1583) 10월 1일(己酉)", ~
- 김장생, "沙溪遺稿 卷7, In 栗谷李先生家狀"