본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사립학교의 자주성과 공공성-학교법인의 사학의 자유를 중심으로

Public Characteristics of the Private School

0

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since 2005, critics and supporters of the amendment to the Private School Act and the constitutional complaint against it have been trading blows in political and social arguments. It is fundamentally derived from the difference of views concerning the two conflicting values, the independence of the private school and the public characteristics of the private school. It is a basic problem which is associated not only with the settlement of the constitutional complaint but also with the settlement of conflicts which occurs among those involved such as the government, educational foundations, schools, teachers, students and parents in the educational decision-making process or legislative proceedings. In this paper, a basic legal character and structure of independence and public characteristics of the private school has been analysed, especially around legislative regulations on the management of foundation itself and of private school. The private schools in Korea are thoroughly incorporated in the system of public education by the Constitution and the laws, and the legal character of private school could be, in terms of the administrative law, explained that it is a kind of chartered corporation which will be established and managed for the public service called “education”. Consequently, the freedom of private school is under more possibility of legislative regulations. The independence of education should be respected, but there are strained and cooperative relations between independence and public characteristics. In the matter of independence, multi-layered problems arise from the collision of various values, such as the freedom of educational foundations, the autonomy of school, and the teacher's and student's(or parent's) right to participate in education. The right of educational foundations to establish and manage private school is based on Article 10, Article 34 section 1 and 4 of the Constitution, not on the property right from Article 23. This basic right can be restricted by the government which has responsibility for enhancing the public characteristics of the private school, by the request for the autonomy of school, and by the rights of teachers and students(parents) to participate. It can be largely shaped and restricted by legislation unless it is infringed essentially or excessively. The main disputes around the constitutional complaint is how far may the legislative regulations reach against educational foundations, concerning the free formation and management of its organizations and agencies. Shaping a system to raise the public characteristics in this area lies within the limits of legislative power since the foundations are intrinsically burdened with the public characteristics of the education.

Abstract

Since 2005, critics and supporters of the amendment to the Private School Act and the constitutional complaint against it have been trading blows in political and social arguments. It is fundamentally derived from the difference of views concerning the two conflicting values, the independence of the private school and the public characteristics of the private school. It is a basic problem which is associated not only with the settlement of the constitutional complaint but also with the settlement of conflicts which occurs among those involved such as the government, educational foundations, schools, teachers, students and parents in the educational decision-making process or legislative proceedings. In this paper, a basic legal character and structure of independence and public characteristics of the private school has been analysed, especially around legislative regulations on the management of foundation itself and of private school. The private schools in Korea are thoroughly incorporated in the system of public education by the Constitution and the laws, and the legal character of private school could be, in terms of the administrative law, explained that it is a kind of chartered corporation which will be established and managed for the public service called “education”. Consequently, the freedom of private school is under more possibility of legislative regulations. The independence of education should be respected, but there are strained and cooperative relations between independence and public characteristics. In the matter of independence, multi-layered problems arise from the collision of various values, such as the freedom of educational foundations, the autonomy of school, and the teacher's and student's(or parent's) right to participate in education. The right of educational foundations to establish and manage private school is based on Article 10, Article 34 section 1 and 4 of the Constitution, not on the property right from Article 23. This basic right can be restricted by the government which has responsibility for enhancing the public characteristics of the private school, by the request for the autonomy of school, and by the rights of teachers and students(parents) to participate. It can be largely shaped and restricted by legislation unless it is infringed essentially or excessively. The main disputes around the constitutional complaint is how far may the legislative regulations reach against educational foundations, concerning the free formation and management of its organizations and agencies. Shaping a system to raise the public characteristics in this area lies within the limits of legislative power since the foundations are intrinsically burdened with the public characteristics of the education.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 권형준, "사립학교법의 개정방향에 대한 제언", 헌법학연구, 11(1), pp.155~178 (2005), 한국헌법학회
  2. 계희열, "헌법학(중)" (2007)
  3. 김남진, "행정법 Ⅱ" (2008)
  4. 김도창, "일반행정법론(하)" (1993)
  5. 김선택, "대학자치의 헌법적 보장과 구체화 입법", 헌법학연구, 11(1), pp.223~251 (2005), 한국헌법학회
  6. 김성수, "개별행정법" (2004)
  7. 김형배, "민법학강의" (2008)
  8. 박부권, "사립학교의 자주성과 공공성에 대한 소고", 교육사회학연구, 18(1), pp.21~38 (2008), 한국교육사회학회
  9. 박윤흔, "행정법강의(하)" (2004)
  10. 최운실, "사학 국제비교 연구", 한국교육개발원, ~ (1988)
  11. 최취주, "공법적 측면에서 본 공교육원칙의 법리에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
  12. 손희권, "열린우리당의 사립학교법 개정안의 종교의 자유 위반 여부 분석", 한국교육, 32(1), pp.327~352 (2005), 한국교육개발원
  13. 스테판 뮬홀, "자유주의와 공동체주의" (2001), 한울아카데미
  14. 신선미, "꼭 알아야 할 프랑스교육에 대한 한국인의 오해 3가지", 교육개발, 통권 : 146 (2004)
  15. 이시우, "사립학교법 개정의 헌법적 제문제 - 학교법인 및 이사회와의 관계를 중심으로 -", 헌법학연구, 11(1), pp.179~221 (2005), 한국헌법학회
  16. 이시우, "헌법상 사학의 자유와 사립학교법, in: 헌법의 규범력과 법질서(허영 박사 정년기념논문집)" (2002)
  17. 임재홍, "사립학교법의 문제점과 개정방향", 열린우리당 사립학교법 개정에 대한 토론회(2004. 9.), ~ (2004)
  18. 표시열, "개정 사립학교법의 헌법적 주요 쟁점", 개정 사립학교법에 대한 헌법적 검토(대한교육법학 회 2006년 제1회 정기학술발표회 자료집). (2006)
  19. 허종렬, "헌법상 사학법인의 자주성과 사립대학의 자율성 법리 연구: 사립학교법 개정방향 탐색을 위한 헌법원리적 접근", 교육법학연구, 16(2), pp.313~338 (2004), 대한교육법학회
  20. 허종열, "사립학교 관련 헌법재판의 동향", 개정 사립학교법에 대한 헌법적 검토(대한교육법학 회 2006년 제1회 정기학술발표회 자료집). (2006)
  21. 헌법재판소, "교육제도의 헌법적 문제에 관한 연구", ~ (2003)
  22. Dreier, "Grundgesetz(Kommentar), Bd.1, 2.Aufl"
  23. Mangoldt, "Grundgesetz(Kommentar), Bd.1, 5.Aufl", pp.181~191
  24. 兼子仁, "敎育法" (1978)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)