군 사법제도 개혁의 요청과 군사법원의 발전방향
Request for Innovation&Development of Military Justice
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is clearly stipulated in the Article 5 of the present Constitutional Law that the Armed Forces shall be charged with the sacred mission of guarding the national security, ensuring the defense of the land and their political neutrality should be maintained. As expressly stated, the basic and foremost task of the armed forces is to secure the sacred mission of national security and the defense of the land. Regarding these purposes, the armed forces must have a special interest in the discipline and training within the military system to secure the strong defense capabilities and war-deterrent forces. The armed forces require direct obeyance of the hierarchy in the system to observe the order of the superior officer. Therefore, the internal order of the armed forces cannot help being constructed as the system of command and obedience even in the most democratized country Due to the characteristics of the armed forces, its organization and activities need the special legal regulation to be treated differently from the general public. The protection of military secrets and the Military Installation & Military Facilities Protection Act exists, besides which the crimes within the armed forces are strictly subjected to the military criminal law, not the general one. Moreover various statutes regarding the armed forces specify the special rules applied to the military system. The court-martial is connected with the distinct characteristics of the military -related statutes. It is the special court established to apply them. It is to make the military judge well-conversed with the distinct characteristics of the armed forces, considering the special situation of military, applying the military-related statutes - different from the statutes applied to the civilians outside of the armed forces. However the application of special rules according to the characteristics of military, and the special judiciary system through the court-martial has caused negative side-effects. So, the request of reforming the military judiciary system has been presented in recent years. Especially the strong argument to abolish the court-martial has brought sharply dissenting opinions. Although it seems to be necessary to improve the constitution and the management of the court martial according to the request of reforming the military judiciary system, the plan to abolish the court martial, the military prosecution and the method to enable the general court & the prosecutor to handle the military case is evaluated as inadequate at the present time. The realistic and practical alternative is to rationalize the court martial in the premise of its retention. For this purpose, the system which the superior officer can participate in the judgement of military case should be abolished through the revision of law of court martial and its supplement by new institutions should be concentrated on the premise of securing the objectivity and fairness of judgement which is the essential part of justice. If the trust of people in the military justice is elevated through this measure, the pressure of its reform can be lowered substantially.
Abstract
It is clearly stipulated in the Article 5 of the present Constitutional Law that the Armed Forces shall be charged with the sacred mission of guarding the national security, ensuring the defense of the land and their political neutrality should be maintained. As expressly stated, the basic and foremost task of the armed forces is to secure the sacred mission of national security and the defense of the land. Regarding these purposes, the armed forces must have a special interest in the discipline and training within the military system to secure the strong defense capabilities and war-deterrent forces. The armed forces require direct obeyance of the hierarchy in the system to observe the order of the superior officer. Therefore, the internal order of the armed forces cannot help being constructed as the system of command and obedience even in the most democratized country Due to the characteristics of the armed forces, its organization and activities need the special legal regulation to be treated differently from the general public. The protection of military secrets and the Military Installation & Military Facilities Protection Act exists, besides which the crimes within the armed forces are strictly subjected to the military criminal law, not the general one. Moreover various statutes regarding the armed forces specify the special rules applied to the military system. The court-martial is connected with the distinct characteristics of the military -related statutes. It is the special court established to apply them. It is to make the military judge well-conversed with the distinct characteristics of the armed forces, considering the special situation of military, applying the military-related statutes - different from the statutes applied to the civilians outside of the armed forces. However the application of special rules according to the characteristics of military, and the special judiciary system through the court-martial has caused negative side-effects. So, the request of reforming the military judiciary system has been presented in recent years. Especially the strong argument to abolish the court-martial has brought sharply dissenting opinions. Although it seems to be necessary to improve the constitution and the management of the court martial according to the request of reforming the military judiciary system, the plan to abolish the court martial, the military prosecution and the method to enable the general court & the prosecutor to handle the military case is evaluated as inadequate at the present time. The realistic and practical alternative is to rationalize the court martial in the premise of its retention. For this purpose, the system which the superior officer can participate in the judgement of military case should be abolished through the revision of law of court martial and its supplement by new institutions should be concentrated on the premise of securing the objectivity and fairness of judgement which is the essential part of justice. If the trust of people in the military justice is elevated through this measure, the pressure of its reform can be lowered substantially.
참고문헌 (28)
- 고문현, "군사법원법상 군사법경찰관의 구속기간 연장 규정의 위헌성", 헌법학연구, 9(3), pp.351~391 (2003), 한국헌법학회
- 국방연구위원회, "군 사법제도 개선안" (2003)
- 김현주, "군 사법제도 개선의 핵심 쟁점에 대한 연구", 형사정책, 20(1), pp.33~60 (2008), 한국형사정책학회
- 노기호, "군형법 제92조 “추행죄”의 위헌성 고찰 ― 육군 제22사단 보통군사법원 2008.8.6. 위헌제청결정사건(2008고10)을 중심으로 ―", 헌법학연구, 15(2), pp.263~300 (2009), 한국헌법학회
- 대통령자문정책기획위원회, "사법제도 개혁 -사법의 선진화, 민주화를 위한 참여정부의 여정-" (2008)
- 송광섭, "군사법제도의 개선방안", 형사법연구, (24), pp.337~364 (2005), 한국형사법학회
- 송기춘, "軍事裁判에 관한 憲法學的 硏究 ―軍事法院의 構成과 運營의 改善方案을 中心으로―", 공법연구, 33(3), pp.273~296 (2005), 한국공법학회
- 송기춘, "‘군사재판을 받지 않을 권리'에 관한 소고", 공법연구, 37(4), pp.193~227 (2009), 한국공법학회
- 송병주, "군사법원의 관할관제도: 군(軍)사법 운영을 본다", 시민과변호사, 통권 : 133, pp.33~36 (2005)
- 윤상민, "형사사법제도의 개혁방안", 전주대 비교법학, 8, pp.289~314 (2008)
- 이계수, "군 사법제도, 어떻게 개혁할 것인가", 민주법학, 통권 : 26, pp.302~324 (2004)
- 이기욱, "군사법 제도개혁의 핵심과제", 한양법학, 15, pp.7~35 (2004)
- 이만종, "군사법제도 개혁방안에 관한 고찰", 법과정책연구, (1(6)), pp.310~329 (2006), 한국법정책학회
- 이성주, "국제인권법과 군에서의 법무관의 역할", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 391, pp.342~345 (2009)
- 장영수, "헌법학" (2009)
- 정미화, "사법제도개혁입법의 중요성에 관하여", 법조, 55(4), pp.19~53 (2006), 법조협회
- 정인섭, "「시민적 및 정치적 권리에 관한 국제규약」과 군장병 인권", 서울대학교 법학, 48(4), pp.35~62 (2007), 법학연구소
- 정진연, "군형사사법제도의 발전방안 고찰", 법학논총, 20, pp.201~222 (2008), 법학연구소
- 최병호, "군사법원과 장병인권 보장", 국방정책연구, 21(4), pp.83~104 (2006), 한국국방연구원
- 최병호, "군 형사절차상의 국선변호인제도 개선방안", 국방정책연구, 22(2), pp.255~279 (2006), 한국국방연구원
- 한인섭, "군사법원에 의한 형사재판의 문제점과 개선방안, 2002.11.11 참여연대 발제문", ~ (2002)
- 한인섭, "군사법제도와 헌법개정", 사법, 1(7), pp.3~35 (2009), 사법발전재단
- "군 사법제도 개악 안 되려면"[URL]
- "군 사법제도 개혁입법안 문제있다"[URL]
- "군사법개혁과 법치주의확립"[URL]
- "軍 사법개혁 신중하게 추진해야 한다"[URL]
- "국방장관등 70명 ‘지휘권 확립·보장돼야’ - 군, 사개추위안 반발"[URL]
- "한국군 사법의 인권, 평화만들기 112호"[URL]
