프랑스공교육에서의 비종교성과 학생의 종교의 자유 - 이슬람스카프논쟁을 중심으로 -
Laïcité of Pubic Education in France and Students’ Religious Freedom - Focused on the Muslim Headscarfs Argument -
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In september 1989, it happened that Muslim girlstudents were temporarily were barred by officials from attending school because they put on the headscarfs of islamic tradition in spite of the warning of school authority in a French public schools. Soon the incident roused the interest throughout the whole country. After the incident, the litigation of resemblant matters were repeated continuously and the law on restriction of wearing the religious clothing or insignia was enacted. Its regular French title is「Loi du 15 mars 2004 encadrant, en application de principe de la laïcité, le port de signes ou de tenue manifestant une appartenance religieuse dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics」. But inquiring into the Stasi Report which became the basis of the law, we can know that it used the brilliant rhetorics about the laïcité and emphasized a vague public order only, not analyzing the headscarfs problem fairly and objectively. The report respected the majority's consciences that were according with the traditional national value, unity and identity. It made a wrong application of laïcité combined with religious freedom. Seen from a wider perspective, the minority's religious freedom is related to the treatment to muslims. In this view, there is a analysis that the headscarfs conflict is not a factor threatening the republic but the symptom showing the French republic in crisis. But seeing the judicial precedents of Conseil d'Etat, it made a clear and reasonable conclusion. That is, So far as the religious clothing composes a free exercise of religious freedom, it does not violate the religious neutrality in principle. Simultaniously Conseil d'Etat acknowledged the limits of freedom of religious clothing also. For example, the limits of freedom are to infringe on the other students’ freedom, to confuse the order within the school and to disturb a normal education etc. So, the Conseil d'Etat has made much of students’ religious freedom, the freedom of their parents’ religious education than the principle of laïcité and developed the precedents in direction of harmonizing with the students’ religious freedom and the order within the school elaborately. By the way, in France today it is considered that the state must take trouble to guarantee to the minority's religious freedom in the sphere that do not infringe the public good and this positive protection of state does not violate laïcité.
Abstract
In september 1989, it happened that Muslim girlstudents were temporarily were barred by officials from attending school because they put on the headscarfs of islamic tradition in spite of the warning of school authority in a French public schools. Soon the incident roused the interest throughout the whole country. After the incident, the litigation of resemblant matters were repeated continuously and the law on restriction of wearing the religious clothing or insignia was enacted. Its regular French title is「Loi du 15 mars 2004 encadrant, en application de principe de la laïcité, le port de signes ou de tenue manifestant une appartenance religieuse dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics」. But inquiring into the Stasi Report which became the basis of the law, we can know that it used the brilliant rhetorics about the laïcité and emphasized a vague public order only, not analyzing the headscarfs problem fairly and objectively. The report respected the majority's consciences that were according with the traditional national value, unity and identity. It made a wrong application of laïcité combined with religious freedom. Seen from a wider perspective, the minority's religious freedom is related to the treatment to muslims. In this view, there is a analysis that the headscarfs conflict is not a factor threatening the republic but the symptom showing the French republic in crisis. But seeing the judicial precedents of Conseil d'Etat, it made a clear and reasonable conclusion. That is, So far as the religious clothing composes a free exercise of religious freedom, it does not violate the religious neutrality in principle. Simultaniously Conseil d'Etat acknowledged the limits of freedom of religious clothing also. For example, the limits of freedom are to infringe on the other students’ freedom, to confuse the order within the school and to disturb a normal education etc. So, the Conseil d'Etat has made much of students’ religious freedom, the freedom of their parents’ religious education than the principle of laïcité and developed the precedents in direction of harmonizing with the students’ religious freedom and the order within the school elaborately. By the way, in France today it is considered that the state must take trouble to guarantee to the minority's religious freedom in the sphere that do not infringe the public good and this positive protection of state does not violate laïcité.
참고문헌 (44)
- 박단, "프랑스의 문화전쟁-공화국과 이슬람" (2005), 책세상
- Voltaire, "관용론" (2001), 한길사
- 오영주, "프랑스 공화국, 왜 비종교성 laicite인가?", 불어불문학연구, 71(71), pp.459~497 (2007), 한국불어불문학회
- Bernard Jeuffroy, "liberté religieuse et régimes des cultes en droit français", ~ (1996)
- Eugen Weber, "Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870-1914", ~ (1976)
- "Commission présidée par Bernard Stasi, Rapport de la Commission de réflexion sur l'application du principe de laïcité dans la République, La Documentation française", ~ (2004)
- Claude-Albert Colliard, "Libertés publiques, 7e éd" (1989)
- Jean Baubérot, "La laïcité, quel héritage?, Labor et fides", ~ (1990)
- Claude-Albert Colliard, "Libertés publiques 7e éd." (1989)
- Pierre Langeron, "Liberté de conscience des agents publics et laïcité", Economica (1986)
- T. Geremmy Gunn, "Religious Freedom and Laïcité: A comparison of the United States and France", B.Y.U.L.Rev (2004)
- Jean Morange, "La laïcité selon le droit de la Ⅲe à la Ve République, in La laïcité au défi de la modernité", Téqui (1990)
- Jean Morange, "Droit de l'homme et libertés publiques, 2e éd." (1989), PUF
- Jacques Robert (avec la collaboration de Jean Duffar), "Droits de l‘homme et libertés fondamentales, 6e éd." (1996), Montchrestien
- Jacques Robert, "Droits de l’homme et libertés fondamentales, 6e éd" (1996)
- Bernard Jeuffroy, "Liberté religieuse et régimes des cultes en droit français", ~ (1996)
- Olivier Dord, "l'obscure clarté de la circulaire <Fillion> du 18 mai 2004, Actualité juridique droit administratif", 1252~1258 (2004)
- Alain Gray, "Tumulte autour de la laïcité", Recueil Dalloz, pp.227~ (2004)
- Philippe Malaurie, "Laïcité, voile islamique et réforme législative, La semaine juridique(JCP) Ed. G", ~ (2004)
- Jacques Robert, "Cacophonie, Revue du droit public", ~ (2004)
- "Circulaire du 12 décembre 1989 du ministre d’Etat, ministre de l’éducation nationale de la jeunesse et des sports, J. C. P.", ~ (1990)
- "CEDH, arrêt du 29 juin 2004, Leyla Şahin c. Turquie, requête, n° 44774", 98
- "Avis du novembre 1989, Conseil d’Etat, Assemblée générale plénière", Actualité juridique droit administratif, ~ (1990)
- "C. E., 2 novembre 1992, Recueil Dalloz Sirey, 1993, jurisprudence", 108~
- "C. E., 14 mars 1994, Yilmaz, J. C. P., 1994, IV", 1289~
- "C. E., 10 mars 1995, Koubi, Note, Recueil Dalloz Sirey, 1995, jurisprudence, p. 206", ~
- "C. E., 20 mai 1996, Ministre de l’Education nationale, de l’Enseigement supérieur et de la Recherche c", M. Ali, Actualité juridique droit administratif, 1996, pp.709~
- "C. E., 9 octobre 1996, Recueil Dalloz Sirey, 1996, informations rapides, p. 247", ~
- "C. E., 27 novembre 1996, M. et Mme Jeouit, J.C.P., 1997, II, 22807, p.138", ~
- "C. E., 27 novembre 1996, M. et Mme Wissaadane et a., J.C.P., 1997, Ⅱ, 22807, p. 137", ~
- "C. E., 8 octobre 2004, Union française pour la cohésion nationale, Revue française administrative de droit administratif", 977~ (2004)
- "C. E., avis du 3 mai 2000, M. Marteaux A.J.D.A.", 673~ (2000)
- "Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S", 205~ (1972)
- "Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S", 38~ (1985)
- 今野健一, "フランス公教育制度の史的形成における自由と國家(7․完)—公教育編成原理における教育の自由と教育による統合の位相—", 山形大学法政論叢, (13) (1998)
- 小泉洋一, "政敎分離と宗敎的 自由-フランスのライシテ-" (1998), 法律文化社
- 小泉洋一, "政敎分離の法" (2005), 法律文化社
- 大石泰彦, "フランスにおける公務員の自制義務", 青山法学論集, 33(2) (1991)