본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공공조직의 다차원적 성과분석을 위한 '공공성과(public performance)'의 개념화: 한국 준정부조직에의 적용을 중심으로

0

조회

0

다운로드

20

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

본 논문은 ‘공공조직의 학습조직적 특성과 조직성과’에 관한 큰 연구과제의 한 부분으로서 성과부분에 관한 연구이다. 이런 맥락에서 본 논문은 크게 두 가지 목적을 가지고 있다. 첫째로, 지금까지 행정학에서 공공조직의 성과연구에 대한 기존의 연구들이 성과요인에 주로 초점을 두고 성과 그 자체에 대한 이론적 논의가 없었을 뿐만 아니라 성과지표에서 공공조직의 중요한 기능인 공공성을 배제하고 주로 효율성 및 효과성을 중심으로 단차원적으로 진행되어 온 것에 문제제기를 한다. 이에 따라 논문의 전반부에서는 다차원적 성과개념과 분석 틀로서 ‘공공성과(public performance)’ 모델에 대한 이론적 논의를 다룬다. 둘째로, 전반부에서 제기된 다차원적 성과개념의 이론적 논의에 따라 본 연구의 주제인 공공조직의 학습조직적 특성의 다차원적 성과를 분석하기 위한 다차원적 ‘공공성과’ 모델을 하나의 시범적 모델로서 제시하면서 측정지표들의 주요 개념들을 설명한다.

참고문헌 (90)

  1. 권경득, "지방정부 조직성과의 결정요인에 관한 연구 - 조직내 요인을 중심으로 -", 한국행정논집, 15(1), pp.131~153 (2003), 한국정부학회
  2. 김태룡, "팀제가 조직성과에 미치는 영향: 행정자치부에 도입된 팀제를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 40(4), pp.303~326 (2006), 한국행정학회
  3. 남창우, "공공부문의 BSC수용성 및 조직성과의 영향요인 분석: 조직구성원의 인식을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 42(03), pp.165~190 (2008), 한국행정학회
  4. 박세정, "지방자치단체의 행정서비스 제고를 위한 품질경영 프로그램 도입 및 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 정부학연구, 8(1), pp.4~129 (2002), 정부학연구소
  5. 안경섭, "공공부문의 조직문화가 조직성과에 미치는 영향: 중앙정부부처를 중심으로", 한국정책과학학회보, 12(4), pp.103~131 (2008), 한국정책과학학회
  6. 안병영, "한국의 공공부문: 이론, 규모와성격, 개혁방향" (2007), 한림대학교출판부
  7. 유홍림, "BPR이 공공조직의 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구", 한국행정학보, 38(5), pp.21~47 (2004), 한국행정학회
  8. 임의영, "공공성의 개념, 위기, 활성화 조건", 정부학연구, 9(1), pp.2~50 (2003), 정부학연구소
  9. 임의영, "신행정학과 공공성. in: 새로운 시대의 공공성 연구", pp.414~440 (2008), 법문사
  10. 정무권, "공공부문의 다양화와 새로운 연구영역. in: 한국행정연구: 도전과 과제" (2009), 박영사
  11. 정무권, "사회적 약자를 위한 행정: 복지, 교육, 여성 등. in: 한국행정학 50년1956-2006" (2006), 한국행정학회
  12. 정무권, "공공성과 보건의료정책: 건강보험제도를 중심으로. in: 새로운 시대의 공공성연구", pp.617~666 (2008), 법문사
  13. 정무권, "한국 중앙정부의 학습조직 구조로서 인프라, 시스템, 문화의 상호관계: 구조방정식을 통한 효능감과 만족감에 대한 효과 분석", 한국행정학보, 42(1), pp.97~122 (2008), 한국행정학회
  14. 한상일, "한국공공기관의 지배구조와 공공성: 민주적 책임성을 중심으로", 한국행정학회 동계학술대회 발표논문 (2009)
  15. 한상일, "한국 공공조직의 학습조직적 특성에 관한 연구: DLOQ모형을 활용한 중앙정부조직의 심층적 탐색", 한국행정연구, 17(1), pp.31~60 (2008), 한국행정연구원
  16. Andrews, Rhys, "Subjective and Objective Measures of Organizational Performane: An Empirical Exploration. in: Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  17. Antonsen, Marianne, "The 'Publicness' of Public Organizations", Public Administration, 75, pp.337~357 (1997)
  18. Argyris, Chris, "Integrating the Individual and the Organization" (1964), Wiley
  19. Beetham, David, "Towards a Universal Framework for Democracy Assessment", Democratization, 11, pp.1~17 (2004)
  20. Behn, Robert D., "Rethinking Democratic Accountability" (2001), Brookings Institution Press
  21. Benn, Stanley, "The Liberal Conception of the Public and the Private. in: Public and Private in Social Life" (1983), Croom Helm Ltd.
  22. Bennis, Warren, "Changing Organizations: Essays on the Development and Evolution of Human Organizations" (1966), McGraw Hill
  23. Boschken, Herman L., "Organizational Performance and Multiple Constituencies", Public Administration Review, 54, pp.308~312 (1994)
  24. Bouckaert, Geert, "Public Productivity Measurement: Diseases and Cures", Public Productivity & Management Review, 15, pp.229~235 (1991)
  25. Bourkaert, Geert, "Performance Measurement and Management: The Achilles' Heel in Administrative Modernization", Public Performance & Managment Review, 25, pp.359~362 (2002)
  26. Boyne, George A., "Concepts and Indications of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales", Public Money & Management, 22, pp.17~24 (2002)
  27. Boyne, Goerge A., "Total Quality Management and Performance: An Evaluation of the Evidence and Lessons for Research on Public Organizations", Public Performance & Management Review, 26, pp.111~131 (2002)
  28. Bozeman, Barry, "Public Values and Public Interests: Counterballancing Economic Individualism" (2007), Georgetown Univ. Press
  29. Brewer, Gene A., "Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, pp.685~711 (2000)
  30. Camerion, Kim, "Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness", Management Science, 32, pp.539~553 (1986)
  31. Cameron, Kim, "Perceptions of Organizational Effectiveness over Organizational Life Cycles", Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, pp.525~544 (1981)
  32. Cameron, Kim, "Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models" (1983), Academic Press
  33. Cameron, Kim, "Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education", Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, pp.604~632 (1978)
  34. Campbell, John P., "On the Nature of Organizational Effectiveness. in: New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness", pp.13~62 (1977), Jossey-Bass
  35. Campbell, Alan K., "Measuring and Improving Services Productivity: Public and Private Sectors Compared", Public Productivity and Management Review, 15, pp.133~139 (1991)
  36. Chun, Young Han, "Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 151, pp.529~557 (2005)
  37. deLeon, Linda, "The Democratic Ethos and Public Management", Administration & Society, 34, pp.229~250 (2002)
  38. The Quality of Democracy, "Diamond, Larry", CDDRL, ~, pp.CDDRL Working Papers. No. 20 (2004)
  39. Erkkila, Tero, "Governance and Accountability: Shift in Conceptualization", Public Administration Quarterly, Spring, pp.1~38 (2007)
  40. Etzioni, Amitai, "Modern Organizations" (1964), Prentice Hall
  41. Frederickson, H. George, "Toward a Theory of the Public for Public Administration", Administration and Society, 22, pp.395~417 (1991)
  42. Goodin, Robert E., "Reasons for Welfare: the Political Theory of the Welfare State" (1988), Princeton University Press
  43. Goodman, Paul S., "New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness" (1977), Jossey Bass, Inc.
  44. Haque, M. Shamul, "The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance", Public Administration Review, 61, pp.65~82 (2001)
  45. Heinrich, Carolyn J., "Governance and Performance: New Perspectives" (2000), Georgetown University Press
  46. Held, David, "Models of Democracy. 2nd ed." (2006), Stanford University Press
  47. Holmberg, Soren, "Quality of Government: What You Get", American Review of Political Science, 12, pp.135~161 (2009)
  48. Hood, Christopher, "The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox?", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, pp.267~282 (2004)
  49. Ingraham, Patricia W., "Government Performance: Why Management Matters" (2003), Johns Hopkins
  50. Kaplan, Robert S., "The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance", Harvard Business Review, 70, pp.71~79 (1992)
  51. Kearney, Richard, "Public Sector Performance: Management, Motivation, and Measurement" (1999), Westview Press
  52. Kim, Sangmook, "Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, pp.245~261 (2005)
  53. Kljin, Erik-Hans, "Democracy and Governance Networks: Compatible or Not?", Public Administration, 85, pp.587~608 (2007)
  54. Likert, Rensis, "The Human Organization" (1967), McGraw Hill
  55. Marsick, Victoria J., "Demonstrating the Value of an Organizational Learning Culture: The Dimensions of Learning Organizations Questionaire", Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, pp.132~151 (2003)
  56. Marsick, Victoria J., "Facilitating Learning Organizations: Making Learning Count" (1999), Gower
  57. Mathur, Navdeep, "Evaluating Democratic Performance: Methodologies for Assessing the Relationship between Network Governance and Citizen", Public Administration Review, (March, pp.April) (2007), 228~237
  58. Miller, David, "Principles of Social Justice" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  59. OECD, "Government of the Future" (2000), OECD
  60. OECD, "Modernizing Government: The Way Forward" (2005), OECD
  61. OECD, "Measuring Government Activity" (2009), OECD
  62. Perrow, Charlse, "Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. third ed." (1972), Random House
  63. Pesch, Udo, "The Predicaments of Publicness" (2005), Delft
  64. Pesch, Udo, "The Publicness of Public Administration", Administration & Society, 40, pp.170~193 (2009)
  65. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, "Organizations and Organizational Theory" (1982), Pittman
  66. Pollit, Christopher, "Public Management Reform: An International Comparison" (2000), Oxford University Press
  67. Quinn, Robert E., "A Competing Values Approach to Organizational Effectiveness", Public Productivity Review, 5, pp.122~140 (1981)
  68. Quinn, Robert E., "A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Value Appraoch to Organizational Analysis", Management Science, 29, pp.363~367 (1983)
  69. Quinn, Rober E., "Productivity and the Process of Organizational Improvement: Why We Cannot Talk to Each Other. in: Public Sector Performance: Management, Motivation, and Measurement" (1999), Westview Press
  70. Radin, Beryl A., "Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values" (2006), Georgetown Univ. Press
  71. Rainey, Hal G., "Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, pp.1~32 (1999)
  72. Rainey, Hal G., "Understanding and Managing Public Organizations" (1997), Jossey-Bass
  73. Romzek, Barbara S., "Dynamics of Public Sector Accountability in an Era of Reform", International Review of Administrative Science, 66, pp.21~44 (2000)
  74. Rothstein, Bo, "What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions", Governance, 21, pp.165~190 (2008)
  75. Scott, P. G., "Comparing Public and Private Organizations: An Exploratory Analysis of Three Frameworks", American Review of Public Administration, 28, pp.126~145 (1998)
  76. Scott, Richard W., "Effectiveness of Organizational Effectiveness Studies. in: New Perspectives on Organizational Effectiveness", pp.63~95 (1977), Jossey-Bass
  77. Report on Government Services, "SCRGSP(Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision)", Autrailian Government, ~ (2009)
  78. Seashore, Stanley E., "Factorial Analysis of Organizational Performance", Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, pp.377~395 (1967)
  79. Selden, Sally Coleman, "Testing a Multi-Dimensional Model of Organizational Performance: Prospects and Problems", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, pp.395~416 (2004)
  80. Selden, Sally Coleman, "Reconciling Competing Values in Public Administration: Understanding the Administrative Role Concept", Administration & Society, 31, pp.171~204 (1999)
  81. Selznick, Philip, "Leadership in Organization" (1957), Harper & Row
  82. Skelcher, Chris, "Does Democracy Matter? A Transatlantic Research Design on Democratic Performance and Special Purpose Governments", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, pp.61~76 (2006)
  83. Sorensen, Eva, "Democratic Theory and Network Governance", Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24, pp.693~720 (2002)
  84. Stone, Deborah A., "Policy Paradox: the Art of Political Decision Making" (2002), Norton
  85. Suleiman, Ezra, "Dismantling Democratic States" (2003), Princeton University Press
  86. Talbot, Colin, "Public Performance: toward a new model?", Public Policy and Administration, 14, pp.15~34 (1999)
  87. Van de Ven, Andrew. H, "Measuring and Assessing Organizations" (1980), Wiley-Interscience
  88. van Thiel, Sandra, "The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector", Public Performance and Management Review, 25, pp.267~281 (2002)
  89. Wamsley, Gary L., "Refounding Democratic Public Administraion: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges" (1996), Sage Publications, Inc.
  90. Yang, Baiyin, "The Construct of the Learning Organization: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation", Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, pp.31~55 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)