아시아 주요 도시의 국제회의 개최의 관계성에 관한 연구
A Study on the Relationship of the Number of International Meeting among Asian Major Cities
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research investigates to study the relationship of the number of international meetings among asian major cities such as Singapore, Seoul, Tokyo, Bangkok etc. For this purpose, correlation analysis was conducted among asian top 9 UIA international meeting cities. Research results showed as follows: First, Seoul, Tokyo, Busan and Jeju were all found to be in a growing relationship, but they were all very competitive with Beijing. Second, the top 4 cities in Northeast Asia had nothing to do with each other, but they had a very positive correlation with Seoul, Tokyo, Busan and Jeju. Hong Kong had nothing to do with not only cities in Southeast Asia but also cities in Northeast Asia. Third, Beijing is not only competitive with all of the top cities in Northeast Asia, but also with Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur in Southeast Asia. Beijing, not even statistically significant, had a negative correlation with Singapore and Hong Kong. This suggests Beijing is in a very strong rivalry with major cities in Southeast Asia as well as Northeast Asia. This is the first study to analyze the correlation and rivalry of the major Asian cities, and is of great significance in that it has identified how they relate to holding international meetings.
Abstract
This research investigates to study the relationship of the number of international meetings among asian major cities such as Singapore, Seoul, Tokyo, Bangkok etc. For this purpose, correlation analysis was conducted among asian top 9 UIA international meeting cities. Research results showed as follows: First, Seoul, Tokyo, Busan and Jeju were all found to be in a growing relationship, but they were all very competitive with Beijing. Second, the top 4 cities in Northeast Asia had nothing to do with each other, but they had a very positive correlation with Seoul, Tokyo, Busan and Jeju. Hong Kong had nothing to do with not only cities in Southeast Asia but also cities in Northeast Asia. Third, Beijing is not only competitive with all of the top cities in Northeast Asia, but also with Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur in Southeast Asia. Beijing, not even statistically significant, had a negative correlation with Singapore and Hong Kong. This suggests Beijing is in a very strong rivalry with major cities in Southeast Asia as well as Northeast Asia. This is the first study to analyze the correlation and rivalry of the major Asian cities, and is of great significance in that it has identified how they relate to holding international meetings.
참고문헌 (14)
- 강승호, "한중 양국의 주요도시 경쟁력 평가", 한국도시지리학회지, 10(3), pp.1~11 (2007), 한국도시지리학회
- 김우곤, "국내 컨벤션산업의 현황 및 경제적 파급효과에 관한 연구", 호텔관광경영연구, 12, pp.79~110 (1997)
- 김철원, "국제회의 경제적 파급효과 분석에 관한 연구", MICE관광연구, 22, pp.7~34 (2009)
- 박자연, "지역 컨벤션참가자 지출의 경제파급효과 분석 - 서울, 대구지역의 외국인참가자를 중심으로 -", MICE관광연구, 11(3), pp.51~70 (2011), 한국마이스관광학회
- 이창현, "세계 및 아시아 주요국가간 컨벤션 개최의 상관관계 및 경쟁관계에 대한 실증연구: UIA 기준 국제회의를 중심으로", 관광학연구, 33(1), pp.327~344 (2009), 한국관광학회
- 이창현, "MICE산업의 고용효과 및 경제기여도에 관한 국제비교 연구: 미국, 캐나다, 멕시코, 영국을 중심으로", MICE관광연구, 18(1), pp.7~22 (2018), 한국마이스관광학회[DOI]
- 2012 MICE산업 통계, 조사 연구, "한국관광공사", ~ (2014)
- Asroff, Milton T., "Convention Sales and Services" (1998), Waterbury Press
- Davison, R., "Marketing Destinations and Venues for Conferences. Conventions and Business Events" (2006), Butterworth-Heinemann
- Statistics Report: The International Association Meetings Market 1997-2006, "ICCA", International Congress and Convention Association, ~ (2007)
- Kotler, P., "Marketing Places: Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to Cities, States, and Nations" (1993), The Free Press
- Kotler, P., "Marketing Asian Places : Attracting Investment, Industry, and Tourism to Cities, States, and Nations" (2002), John Wiley & Sons(Asia)Pte Ltd
- UIA, "International Meetings Statistics for the year 2004", Union of International Associations, ~ (2005)
- Weber, L., "Meeting Planners' use and evaluation of convention and visitor bureaus", Tourism Management, 22, pp.599~606 (2001)