본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Semantic relations and multiple case constructions: an experimental approach

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Multiple Nominative Constructions (MNCs) and Multiple Accusative Constructions (MACs) have been some of the hottest and interesting topics in Korean syntax. Though there have been lots of previous studies on these constructions, most of them have provided theoretical accounts. Recently, Lee (2013) took an experimental approach and examined native speakers' grammaticality judgment of these constructions. This paper took the same approach to these constructions, but the experiment was performed with 100 native speakers. Ryu (2013) tried to unify MNCs and MACs into Multiple Case Constructions (MCCs) and to classify them into 16 types based on the semantic relations. This paper adopted his data sets and the experiment was performed based on these 16 semantic relations. The experiment was designed following Johnson (2008); and the native speakers’ grammaticality judgments were measured with two scales, numerical estimates and line drawing, though the latter was adopted in the actual analyses. Through the experiment, the following facts were observed again: (i) The grammaticality of the MCCs does not constitute a homogeneous group, (ii) The grammaticality of the MCCs varies depending on which semantic relations hold between two NPs, (iii) MNCs had more grammaticality judgments than MACs if both constructions occurred in the similar contexts, and (iv) the sentences in some MAC types had much lower grammaticality than those in the others, as Ryu (2013) mentioned.

Abstract

Multiple Nominative Constructions (MNCs) and Multiple Accusative Constructions (MACs) have been some of the hottest and interesting topics in Korean syntax. Though there have been lots of previous studies on these constructions, most of them have provided theoretical accounts. Recently, Lee (2013) took an experimental approach and examined native speakers' grammaticality judgment of these constructions. This paper took the same approach to these constructions, but the experiment was performed with 100 native speakers. Ryu (2013) tried to unify MNCs and MACs into Multiple Case Constructions (MCCs) and to classify them into 16 types based on the semantic relations. This paper adopted his data sets and the experiment was performed based on these 16 semantic relations. The experiment was designed following Johnson (2008); and the native speakers’ grammaticality judgments were measured with two scales, numerical estimates and line drawing, though the latter was adopted in the actual analyses. Through the experiment, the following facts were observed again: (i) The grammaticality of the MCCs does not constitute a homogeneous group, (ii) The grammaticality of the MCCs varies depending on which semantic relations hold between two NPs, (iii) MNCs had more grammaticality judgments than MACs if both constructions occurred in the similar contexts, and (iv) the sentences in some MAC types had much lower grammaticality than those in the others, as Ryu (2013) mentioned.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Baayen, Harald., "Analyzing Linguistic Data : A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  2. Bard, Ellen., "Magnitude Estimation of Linguistic Acceptability", Language, 72, pp.32~68 (1996)
  3. Carnie, Andrew., "Syntax : A Generative Introduction. 3rd Edition" (2012), Blackwell
  4. Cho, Seongeun., "Three Forms of Case Agreement in Korean", 박사, pp.2000
  5. Choe, Hyun-Bae., "Wulimalpon(The Korean Grammar)" (1937), Top Publishing Company
  6. Choe, Hyun-Sook., "Syntactic Adjunction, A-chains, and the ECP: Multiple Identical Case Construction in Korean", Proceedings of the 17th North East Linguistic Society(NELS-17), pp.100~121 (1987)
  7. Choi, Incheol., "Sentential Specifiers in the Korean Clause Structure", Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG-19), pp.75~85 (2012)
  8. 최인철, "The Partial Parallelism between Double Nominative Construction and ECM Construction in Korean", 현대문법연구, 53(53), pp.75~101 (2008), 현대문법학회
  9. Cowart, Wayne., "Experimental Syntax : Applying Objective Methods to Sentence Judgments" (1997), Sage Publications
  10. Han, Jeonghan., "On Grammatical Coding of Information Structure in Korean : A Role and Reference Grammar Account", 박사, pp.1999
  11. Hong, Ki-Sun., "Argument Selection and Case-Marking in Korean", 박사, pp.1991
  12. Hong, Ki-Sun., "Eynge-wa Kwuke-uy Insang Kwumwun Pikyo Pwunsek(Subject-to-object raising constructions in English and Korean)", Language Research, 33, pp.409~434 (1997)
  13. Johnson, Keith., "Quantitative Methods in Linguistics" (2008), Blackwell
  14. Kang, Beom-Mo., "Functional Inheritance, Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation", 박사, pp.1988
  15. Kang, Myung-Yoon., "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 2", pp.80~88 (1987)
  16. Keller, Frank., "Gradient in Grammar : Experimental and Computational Aspects of Degrees of Grammaticality", 박사, pp.2000
  17. Kim, Jong-Bok., "Two Types of Multiple Nominative Construction: A Constructional Approach", Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG-14), pp.364~372 (2007)
  18. 김종복, "Parsing Two Types of Multiple Nominative Constructions: A Constructional Approach", 언어와 정보, 11(1), pp.25~37 (2007), 한국언어정보학회
  19. Kim, Jong-Bok., "A Constraint-based and Head-driven Approach to Multiple Nominative Constructions", Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG-7), pp.166~181 (2000)
  20. Kim, Jong-Bok., "A Constraint-based Approach to Some Multiple Nominative Constructions in Korean", Proceedings of the 14th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation (PACLIC-14), pp.165~176 (2001)
  21. Kim, Jong-Bok., "Hankwuke Kwukwuco Mwunpep (written in Korean, Korean Phrase Structure Grammar)" (2004), HankukMunhwasa
  22. Kim, Young-Joo., "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 3", pp.445~467 (1989)
  23. Kim, Young-Joo., "The Syntax and Semantics of Korean Case : The Interaction between Lexical and Syntactic Levels of Representation", 박사, pp.1990
  24. Korean Linguistics 2, "Japanese", pp.1993, Kitahara, Hisatsugu.
  25. 이성용, "Two Subject Positions in Multiple Nominative Constructions", 언어과학, 14(2), pp.239~262 (2007), 한국언어과학회
  26. 이용훈, "An Experimental Approach to Multiple Case Constructions in Korean", 언어와 정보, 17(2), pp.29~50 (2013), 한국언어정보학회
  27. Lodge, Milton., "Magnitude Scaling : Quantitative Measurement of Opinions" (1981), Sage Publications
  28. Maling, Joan., "Case Assignment in the Inalienable Possession Construction in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.37~68 (1992)
  29. Moon, Gui-Sun., "The Predication Operation and Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean : Focusing on Inalienable Possessive Constructions", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10(1), pp.239~263 (2000)
  30. Na, Younghee., "On the Status of Certain Island Violations in Korean", Linguistics and Philosophy, 16(2), pp.181~229 (1993)
  31. O’Grady, William., "Categories and Case" (1991), John Benjamins Publishing
  32. Park, Byung-Soo., "Constraints on Multiple Nominative Constructions in Korean : A Constraint-based Lexicalist Approach", The Journal of Linguistic Science, 20, pp.147~190 (2001)
  33. 박희문, "한국어 이중주어구문의 제약기반적 분석", 언어연구, 21(1), pp.87~111 (2005), 한국현대언어학회
  34. Park, Ki-Seong., "The Semantics and Pragmatics of Case Marking in Korean : A Role and Reference Grammar Account", 박사, pp.1995
  35. Rhee, Seongha., "On the Multiple Nominative Constructions in Korean" (1999), Hankuk Publishing Co
  36. 류병래, "Multiple Case Marking Constructions in Korean Revisited", 언어와 정보, 17(2), pp.1~27 (2013), 한국언어정보학회
  37. Schütze, Carson., "Korean “Case stacking” Isn’t: Unifying Non-case Uses of Case Particles", Proceedings of the 26th North East Linguistic Society (NELS-26), pp.351~365 (1996)
  38. Schütze, Carson., "The Empirical Base of Linguistics : Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology" (1996), University of Chicago Press
  39. Schütze, Carson., "On Korean"Case Stacking" : The Varied Functions of the Particles-ka and-lul", The Linguistic Review, 18, pp.193~232 (2001)
  40. Stevenson, Stanley., "Psycholinguistics : Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural, and Social Prospects" (1975), John Wiley
  41. Ura, Hiroyuki., "Multiple Feature-Checking : A Theory of Grammatical Function Splitting", 박사, pp.1996
  42. Van Valin, Robert., "Syntax : Structure, Meaning, and Function" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  43. Van Valin, Robert., "Current Approaches to Syntax", pp.329~352 (1980), Academic Press
  44. Van Valin, Robert., "Case in Role and Reference Grammar", pp.102~120 (2009), Oxford University Press
  45. Yang, In-Seok., "Korean Syntax: Case Markers, Delimiters, Complementation, and Relativization", 박사, pp.1972
  46. Yoon, James., "Some Queries Concerning the Syntax of Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 16, pp.215~236 (1986)
  47. Yoon, James., "The Grammar of Inalienable Possession Constructions in Korean, Mandarin and French", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.357~368 (1989)
  48. Yoon, James., "Raising Specifiers: A Macroparametric Account of SOR in Some Altaic Languages", A Paper Presented at the Workshop on Formal Approaches to Altaic Languages (2003), MIT
  49. Yoon, James., "Non-nominative Subjects", pp.265~314 (2004), Mouton deGruyter
  50. Korean Linguistics 16, "Japanese", pp.2009, Yoon, James.
  51. Yoon, Jeong-Me., "The Argument Structure of Relational Nouns and Inalienable Possessor Constructions in Korean", Language Research, 33(2), pp.231~264 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)