On the Affected Construction in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper revisits the structure of the so-called “adversity” construction in Korean. The construction is formed by attaching the idiosyncratic -i/-hi/-li/-ki suffixes to some transitive roots, but differ from typical inchoative/passive constructions, which also involve the -i/-hi/-li/-ki allomorphy. I show that the peculiarities of the construction arise due to the selectional relationships among syntactic heads—active Voice, high applicative, verbalizer—as well as an implied PRO argument. I motivate the analysis with various pieces of evidence—the behaviors of depictive secondary predicates, properties of case marking and agent-oriented adverbs, as well as scope interpretation. I then show that a three-way distinction among the construction in question and two types of passives in Korean emerges due to two syntactic factors: the type of the Voice head and the syntactic position of the relevant verbal suffixes. Finally, some implications regarding the semantics of Voice and high applicative are discussed.
Abstract
This paper revisits the structure of the so-called “adversity” construction in Korean. The construction is formed by attaching the idiosyncratic -i/-hi/-li/-ki suffixes to some transitive roots, but differ from typical inchoative/passive constructions, which also involve the -i/-hi/-li/-ki allomorphy. I show that the peculiarities of the construction arise due to the selectional relationships among syntactic heads—active Voice, high applicative, verbalizer—as well as an implied PRO argument. I motivate the analysis with various pieces of evidence—the behaviors of depictive secondary predicates, properties of case marking and agent-oriented adverbs, as well as scope interpretation. I then show that a three-way distinction among the construction in question and two types of passives in Korean emerges due to two syntactic factors: the type of the Voice head and the syntactic position of the relevant verbal suffixes. Finally, some implications regarding the semantics of Voice and high applicative are discussed.
참고문헌 (54)
- Alexiadou, Artemis, "Phases of interpretation", pp.187~211 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
- Baker, Mark, "Passive arguments raised", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.219~251 (1989)
- Chomsky, Noam., "Lectures on government and binding" (1982), Foris
- Chomsky, Noam., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Collins, Chris, "A smuggling approach to the passive in English", Syntax, 8, pp.81~120 (2005)
- Coon, Jessica, "Transitivity in Chol: A New Argument for the Split-VP Hypothesis", Proceedings of NELS, 41 (2011)
- Cuervo, María Cristina., "Datives at large", PhD, pp.2003
- Causatives and passives in Korean: Evidence for clause union without revaluation, "Gerdts, Donna.", Department of Linguistics, 98~185 (1986)
- Folli, Raffaella, "Causation, obligation and argument structure : On the nature of little v", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.197~238 (2007)
- Hale, Kenneth, "The view from building 20: A Festschrift for Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~108 (1993), MIT
- Harley, Heidi., "Subjects, events and licensing", PhD, pp.1995
- Harley, Heidi, "Possession and the double object construction", Yearbook of Linguistic Variation, 2, pp.29~68 (2002)
- Harley, Heidi., "Handbook of Japanese linguistics", pp.20~53 (2008), OUP
- Harley, Heidi, "External arguments and the mirror principle : on the distinctness of Voice and v", Lingua, 28, pp.34~57 (2013)
- Harley, Heidi, "The ‘bundling’ hypothesis and the disparate functions of little v", Paper presented at the little v workshop (2013), Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
- Hong, Ki-Sun, "The passive construction and case in Korean", Berkeley Linguistics Society, 17, pp.130~143 (1991)
- Hoshi, Hiroto, "Theta-role assignment, passivization, and excorporation", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.147~178 (1994)
- Ishizuka, Tomoko., "Toward a unified analysis of passives in Japanese: A cartographic minimalist approach", PhD, pp.2010
- Jaeggli, Osvaldo, "Passive", Linguistic Inquiry, 17, pp.587~622 (1986)
- 정현경, "Korean First Phase Syntax as Non-Voice-bundling", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.201~230 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
- Jung, Hyun Kyoung, "On the syntax of applicative and causative constructions", PhD, pp.2014
- Kang, Young-Se., "Korean syntax and Universal Grammar", PhD, pp.1986
- Kim, Hee-Soo, "Ambiguity in the Korean morphological causative", passive, Korean Linguistics, pp.2003, 12[DOI]
- Kim, Kyumin, "High applicatives in Korean causatives and passives", Lingua, 121, pp.487~510 (2011)
- Kim, Lan., "The syntax of lexical decomposition of predicates: Ways of encoding events and multidimensional meanings", PhD, pp.2014
- Kim, Young-Joo., "The syntax and semantics of Korean Case: The interaction between lexical and syntactic levels of representation", PhD, pp.1990
- Ko, Heejeong, "Predication and edge effects", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, pp.725~778 (2011)
- Kratzer, Angelika., "Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Larson, Richard, "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 9, pp.335~391 (1988)
- Larson, Richard, "Promise and the Theory of Control", Linguistics Inquiry, 22, pp.103~139 (1991)
- Maling, Joan, "Adverbials and structural case in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.297~308 (1989)
- Maling, Joan, "Case Assignment in the Inalienable Possession Construction in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, pp.37~68 (1992)
- Marantz, Alec, "No escape from syntax. Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon", Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, pp.201~225 (1997)
- McGinnis, Martha, "Variation in the phase structure of applicatives", Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 1, pp.105~146 (2001)
- McGinnis, Martha., "Object asymmetries in a phase theory of syntax", Proceedings of the 2001 Canadian Linguistic Association Annual Conference, pp.133~144 (2002), University of Ottawa, Department of Linguistics
- Merchant, Jason, "Voice and ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 44, pp.77~108 (2013)
- Miyagawa, Shigeru., "Why Agree? Why Move?" (2010), MIT Press
- Miyagawa, Shigeru., "Blocking and causatives: unexpected competition across derivations", Proceedings of the Arizona Linguistics Circle, 4 (2011)
- Park, Jeong-Woon., "Morphological causatives in Korean: problems in grammatical polysemy and constructional relations", PhD, pp.1994
- Park, Sang Doh., "Parameters of passive constructions in English and Korean", PhD, pp.2005
- Park, Sang Doh, "Direct movement passives in Korean and Japanese", Japanese, 2003, pp.12, 307~321[DOI]
- Pylkkänen, Liina., "Introducing arguments", PhD, pp.2002
- Pylkkänen, Liina., "Introducing arguments" (2008), MIT Press
- Oshima, David, "Adversity and Korean", Japanese Passives : Constructional Analogy, 2006, 137~166
- Ritter, Elizabeth, "The function of have", Lingua, 101, pp.295~321 (1997)
- Schäfer, Florian, "Two types of external argument licensing – the case of causers", Studia Linguistica, 66, pp.128~180 (2012)
- Schütze, Carsen., "On Korean 'Case Stacking' : The Varied Functions of the Particles ka and lul", The Linguistic Review, 18, pp.193~232 (2001)
- Shibagaki, Ryosuke., "Secondary predication in Chinese, Japanese, Mongolian and Korean", PhD, pp.2011
- Shibatani, Masayoshi, "Grammatical relations and surface cases", Language, 53, pp.789~809 (1977)
- Shim, Ji Young, "Minimalist explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface", pp.221~241 (2008)
- Son, Minjeong., "Causation and syntactic decomposition of events", PhD, pp.2006
- Whitman, John, "Korean morphological passive", causatives, 1988, 714~727
- Yeon, Jaehoon, "The Korean causative-passive correlation revisited", Language Research, 27, pp.73~58 (1991)
- Yeon, Jaehoon., "Korean Grammatical Constructions" (2003), Saffron
