The English present perfect and simple past tense
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As is well known, the English present perfect incorporates temporal anteriority as part of its meaning. However, such conflicting phenomena like the ‘definiteness effect’ and the ‘lifetime effect’ are observed, along with the pastness of the perfect. In this context, a variety of theories utilizing concepts such as ‘indefinite past,’ ‘perfect state,’ and ‘extended now’ have been proposed as major theories on the perfect among others, but not without theoretical defects. Recently, Meyer-Viol and Jones (2011) also propose a formal account of the English present perfect and simple past tense, based on the notions of ‘reference time,’ ‘event time,’ and ‘speech time.’ They account for the definiteness effect and the lifetime effect by analyzing the perfect to have its reference time at the speech time, while the simple past tense to have its reference time at the event time, in line with Reichenbach (1947). Given this, it is proposed in this paper that these previous theories and observations including Meyer-Viol and Jones’s generalizations are met with numerous counterexamples, and that the difference between the English perfect and simple past should be accounted for by classifying the English perfect into the three uses, i.e., Experientials, Resultatives, and Universals. In addition to the semantics of the three uses of the perfect, pragmatic competition between the perfect and simple past is proposed to play a role in deciding which of the two constructions should be chosen, in line with Schaden (2009).
Abstract
As is well known, the English present perfect incorporates temporal anteriority as part of its meaning. However, such conflicting phenomena like the ‘definiteness effect’ and the ‘lifetime effect’ are observed, along with the pastness of the perfect. In this context, a variety of theories utilizing concepts such as ‘indefinite past,’ ‘perfect state,’ and ‘extended now’ have been proposed as major theories on the perfect among others, but not without theoretical defects. Recently, Meyer-Viol and Jones (2011) also propose a formal account of the English present perfect and simple past tense, based on the notions of ‘reference time,’ ‘event time,’ and ‘speech time.’ They account for the definiteness effect and the lifetime effect by analyzing the perfect to have its reference time at the speech time, while the simple past tense to have its reference time at the event time, in line with Reichenbach (1947). Given this, it is proposed in this paper that these previous theories and observations including Meyer-Viol and Jones’s generalizations are met with numerous counterexamples, and that the difference between the English perfect and simple past should be accounted for by classifying the English perfect into the three uses, i.e., Experientials, Resultatives, and Universals. In addition to the semantics of the three uses of the perfect, pragmatic competition between the perfect and simple past is proposed to play a role in deciding which of the two constructions should be chosen, in line with Schaden (2009).
참고문헌 (36)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation, In Studies in general and oriental linguistics", pp.52~91 (1970), TEC Corporation
- Comrie, Bernard, "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Declerck, Renaat, "Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse" (1991), Routledge
- Giorgi, Alessandra, "Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax" (1998), Oxford University Press
- Inoue, Kyoko, "An analysis of the English present perfect", Linguistics, an Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 17, pp.561~589 (1979)
- Kamp, Hans, "From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory" (1993), Kluwer
- Katz, Graham, "On the stativity of the English perfect, In Perfect Explorations", pp.205~234 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Klein, Wolfgang, "The present perfect puzzle", Language, 68(3), pp.525~552 (1992)
- Klein, Wolfgang, "Time in Language" (1994), Routledge
- Klein, Wolfgang, "An Analysis of the German Perfect", Language, 76, pp.358~382 (2000)
- Maurice, W., "Discrimination between past and present", Neuphilologische Monatsschrift, 6, pp.312~330 (1935)
- McCawley, Jim D., "Tense and time reference in English, In Studies in linguistic semantics", pp.96~113 (1971), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- McCoard, Robert W., "The English perfect: Tense-choice and pragmatic inferences" (1978), North-Holland
- ter Meulen, Alice, "Representing Time in Natural Language: The Dynamic Interpretation of Tense and Aspect" (1995), MIT Press
- Meyer-Viol, Wilfried P. M., "Reference time and the English past tenses", Linguistics and Philosophy, 34, pp.223~256 (2011)
- Michaelis, Laura, "The ambiguity of the English present perfect", Journal of Linguistics, 30, pp.111~157 (1994)
- Mittwoch, Anita, "Aspects of English aspect: On the interaction of perfect, progressive and durational phrases", Linguistics and Philosophy, 11(2), pp.203~254 (1988)
- Mittwoch, Anita, "The English resultative perfect and its relationship to the experiential perfect and the simple past tense", Linguistics and Philosophy, 31, pp.323~351 (2008)
- Moens, Marc, "Temporal ontology and temporal reference", Computational Linguistics, 14, pp.15~28 (1988)
- Montague, Richard, "The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English, In Approaches to Natural Language", pp.221~242 (1973), Reidel
- Musan, Renate, "The present perfect in German: Outline of its semantic composition", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19(2), pp.355~401 (2001)
- Nishiyama, Atsuko, "The Semantics and Pragmatics of the Perfect in English and Japanese", 박사, pp.2006
- Nishiyama, Atsuko, "What is a perfect state?", WCCFL 23 Proceedings, pp.101~113 (2004), Cascadilla Press
- Pancheva, Roumyana, "On the present perfect puzzle", Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (=NELS), 34 (2004), GLSA
- Parsons, Terry, "Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics" (1990), MIT Press
- Portner, Paul, "Perfect and progressive, In Semantics: An International handbook of natural language meaning" (2011), Mouton de Gruyter
- Rathert, Monika, "Textures of Time. Studia Grammatica 59" (2004), Akademie
- Reichenbach, Hans, "Elements of symbolic logic" (1980), Dover
- Rothstein, Björn, "The Perfect Time Span: On the present perfect in German, Swedish, and English" (2008), John Benjamins
- Schaden, Gerhard, "Present perfects compete", Linguistics and Philosophy, 32(2), pp.115~141 (2009)
- Smith, Carlota S., "The parameter of aspect" (1992), Kluwer
- Smith, Carlota S., "The parameter of aspect. 2nd edition" (1997), Kluwer
- Spejewski, Beverly, "The Perfect as Temporal Subordination", 석사, pp.1997
- Stump, Gregory T., "The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Synthese Language Library 25" (1985), Kluwer
- de Swart, Henriëtte, "Aspect shift and coercion", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.347~385 (1998)
- 윤영은, "The English Resultative and Experiential Perfects: A Reply to Mittwoch (2008)", 언어, 36(1), pp.133~155 (2011), 한국언어학회