From lists to universal quantification: Disjunction in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic aspects of the so-called disjunctive morpheme -(i)na used in various Korean constructions, first noted by Saman Hong (2002). The relevant constructions are grouped into three categories depending on the number and nature of disjuncts (i.e.,uni-disjunction, di-disjunction, and multi-disjunction). Various constructions in context are examined to show that the three apparently unrelated meaning aspects (universal quantification, disjunction, and list enumeration) can be derived ultimately from multi-disjunctions through the covert operation of closure or exhaustification in Groenendijk & Stokhof’s (1984) sense. The paper argues that the various usages can be accounted for in a uniform manner by assuming that -na is essentially a morpheme that indicates the presence of additional alternatives in the list, or an anti-exhaustivity marker in Kratzer & Shimoyama’s (2002) sense.
Abstract
This paper examines the syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic aspects of the so-called disjunctive morpheme -(i)na used in various Korean constructions, first noted by Saman Hong (2002). The relevant constructions are grouped into three categories depending on the number and nature of disjuncts (i.e.,uni-disjunction, di-disjunction, and multi-disjunction). Various constructions in context are examined to show that the three apparently unrelated meaning aspects (universal quantification, disjunction, and list enumeration) can be derived ultimately from multi-disjunctions through the covert operation of closure or exhaustification in Groenendijk & Stokhof’s (1984) sense. The paper argues that the various usages can be accounted for in a uniform manner by assuming that -na is essentially a morpheme that indicates the presence of additional alternatives in the list, or an anti-exhaustivity marker in Kratzer & Shimoyama’s (2002) sense.
참고문헌 (18)
- Choi, Jin-young, "Free Choice and Negative Polarity: A Compositional Analysis of Korean Polarity Sensitive Items", 박사, pp.2007
- Chung, Daeho, "On the Representation and Operation of WH-Questions", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10(2), pp.357~387 (2000)
- Cinque, Guglielmo, "Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective" (1999), Oxford University Press
- Dayal, Veneeta, "Any as Inherently Modal", Linguistics and Philosophy, 21, pp.433~476 (1998)
- Fintel, Kai von, "Whatever, In SALT 10: 27-39" (2000), Cornell Univ
- Gill, Kook-hee, S, "Connectives, Indeterminates, and Quantificational Variability, In Formal Syntax and Semantics 5", pp.75~88 (2004)
- Goenendijk, Jeroen, "Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers", 박사, pp.1984
- Halliday, M. A. K, "Functional Diversity in Language as Seen from a Consideration of Modality and Mood in English", Foundations of Language, 6, pp.322~361 (1970)
- Han, Cheng-Hye, "Imperatives, In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning", pp.1785~1804 (2011)
- 홍민표, "On Free Choice and Subtrigging in Korean", 언어연구, 28(3), pp.543~567 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- Hong, Saman, "Kwuke Thukswu Cosa Sinyeonkwu (A New Study on Korean Particles)" (2002), Yeoklak Publishing Co
- Huitink, Janneke, "Modal Concord : A Case Study of Dutch", Journal of Semantics, 29, pp.403~437 (2012)
- Kamp, Hans, "Free Choice Permission", Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N.S, 74, pp.57~74 (1973)
- Kratzer, Angelika, "Indeterminate Pronouns: The View from Japanese", Proceedings of the Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, 3, pp.1~25 (2002)
- LeGrand, J, "Or and Any: The Syntax and Semantics of Two Logical Operators", 박사, pp.1975
- Lyons, J, "Semantics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- "Disjunction and Implicatures: Some Notes on Recent Developments" (2009)[URL]
- Zimmermann, Thomas Ede, "Free Choice Disjunction and Epistemic Possibility", Natural Language Semantics, 8, pp.255~290 (2000)