불대수적 의미론에서의 한국어 명사구의 연접과 이접 연결
Algebraic Properties of Conjunctive and Disjunctive DP Co-ordinations
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focuses on studying the conjunctive and disjunctive coordination of DP phrases in Korean, especially focusing on the conjunctive meaning derived from a DP disjunction phrases coordinated by -(i)na. Conjunction and disjunction are logical operators and when they are used in a natural language, they amount to a meet operator and a join operator respectively. This makes an assumption that the domains they operate on form a boolean lattice structure, which instantly raises a question regarding the operators' function on the <e> type individuals. Especially, the conjunction of <e> type noun phrases is tightly associated with the issue of plurality and distributivity/collectivity. I adopt Winter (2001)'s boolean approach on conjunctive DP phrases, which forms a base for the discussion of the conjunctive meaning from -(i)na disjunction phrases. I propose that -(i)na has only a collective conjunction phrase as its scalar competitor but not a distributive one. This leads to -(i)na phrases' prevalent generation of conjunctive meanings compared to other disjunctive items such as or in English.
Abstract
This paper focuses on studying the conjunctive and disjunctive coordination of DP phrases in Korean, especially focusing on the conjunctive meaning derived from a DP disjunction phrases coordinated by -(i)na. Conjunction and disjunction are logical operators and when they are used in a natural language, they amount to a meet operator and a join operator respectively. This makes an assumption that the domains they operate on form a boolean lattice structure, which instantly raises a question regarding the operators' function on the <e> type individuals. Especially, the conjunction of <e> type noun phrases is tightly associated with the issue of plurality and distributivity/collectivity. I adopt Winter (2001)'s boolean approach on conjunctive DP phrases, which forms a base for the discussion of the conjunctive meaning from -(i)na disjunction phrases. I propose that -(i)na has only a collective conjunction phrase as its scalar competitor but not a distributive one. This leads to -(i)na phrases' prevalent generation of conjunctive meanings compared to other disjunctive items such as or in English.
참고문헌 (18)
- 류병율, "한국어 접속조사 ‘-이나 (-(이)나)’", 한국어 의미학, 29, pp.29~56 (2009), 한국어의미학회
- 류병률, "한국어 조사 '-이나'의 의미와 쓰임", 박사, 언어학과, pp.2013
- 윤재학, "연접적 ‘이나’", 언어와 정보, 4(2), pp.41~54 (2000)
- Bennett, M., "Some Extensions of a Montague Fragment of English", Ph.D., pp.1974
- Chierchia, G., "Structures and Beyond" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Fox, D, "Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics", pp.71~120 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Hoeksema, J., "Studies in Modeltheoretic Semantics" (1983), Foris
- Hoeksema. J., "The Semantics of Non-boolean and", Journal of Semantics, 6, pp.19~40 (1988)
- Keenan, E, "Boolean Semantics for Natural Language" (1985), Reidel
- Kratzer, A., "Indeterminate Phrases: the View from Japanese", The Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, pp.1~25 (2002), Hituzi Syobo
- Krifka, M., "Papers from Second Symposium of Logic and Language" (1990), Akaemiai Kiado
- Lasersohn, P., "Plurality, Conjunction and Events" (1995), Kluwer
- Partee, B., "Studies in Discourse Representation Theories and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers" (1987), Floris
- Partee, B, "Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language" (1983), De Gruyter
- Sauerland, U., "Scalar Implicatures in Complex Sentences", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(3), pp.367~391 (2004)
- Scha, R., "Formal Methods in the Study of Language" (1981), Mathematisch Centrum
- Schwarzschild, R., "Pluralities" (1996), Kluwer
- Winter, Y., "Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics: The Interpretation of Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language" (2001), The MIT Press