Crossover and Reconstruction
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main goal of this paper is to show how Korean crossover cases with scrambling are accounted for without recourse to reconstruction. To achieve this goal, the properties of crossover in Korean are investigated within the conception of connectivity and an agreement-based approach without assuming the reconstruction hypothesis. One major point of Korean crossover cases is that they are instances of connectivity and they fall within our reference agreement principles. With respect to connectivity and agreement, it is important to note that ku ‘he’ can display connectivity with A-type QPs, whereas ku-tul ‘they’ can display connectivity with B-type QPs. That is, if a QP is an A-type QP, ku ‘he’ can display connectivity since its referent consists of a single entity. However, if a QP is a B-type QP, ku-tul ‘they’ can display connectivity since its referent consists of more than a single entity. On the other hand, Korean reflexives, regardless of the types of QPs, can display connectivity with A-type QPs or B-type QPs since their referents can consist of both a single entity and more than a single entity. Additionally, this paper provides some empirical evidence which does not entertain the reconstruction hypothesis that a dependent term after reconstruction must be c-commanded by the QR trace of a QP.
Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to show how Korean crossover cases with scrambling are accounted for without recourse to reconstruction. To achieve this goal, the properties of crossover in Korean are investigated within the conception of connectivity and an agreement-based approach without assuming the reconstruction hypothesis. One major point of Korean crossover cases is that they are instances of connectivity and they fall within our reference agreement principles. With respect to connectivity and agreement, it is important to note that ku ‘he’ can display connectivity with A-type QPs, whereas ku-tul ‘they’ can display connectivity with B-type QPs. That is, if a QP is an A-type QP, ku ‘he’ can display connectivity since its referent consists of a single entity. However, if a QP is a B-type QP, ku-tul ‘they’ can display connectivity since its referent consists of more than a single entity. On the other hand, Korean reflexives, regardless of the types of QPs, can display connectivity with A-type QPs or B-type QPs since their referents can consist of both a single entity and more than a single entity. Additionally, this paper provides some empirical evidence which does not entertain the reconstruction hypothesis that a dependent term after reconstruction must be c-commanded by the QR trace of a QP.
참고문헌 (13)
- Agüero-Bautista, Calixto, "Team Weak Crossover", Linguistic Inquiry, 43, pp.1~41 (2012)
- Akmajian, A., "Aspects of the Grammar of Focus in English", 박사, pp.1970
- Barker, Chris, "Quantificational Binding Does Not Require C-Command", Linguistic Inquiry, 453, pp.614~633 (2012)
- Barss, A, "Chains and Anaphoric Dependence", 박사, pp.1986
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Higgins, F. R, "The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English", 박사, pp.1973
- Hoji, Hajime, "Weak Crossover and Move-α in Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1, pp.245~259 (1983)
- Hoji, Hajime, "Null Object and Sloppy Identity in Japanese", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.127~152 (1998)
- 강남길, "Quirky Binding in the Object-Subject Construction and its Semantics", 영어영문학연구, 50(1), pp.1~23 (2008), 한국중앙영어영문학회
- 강남길, "The Reason why Ku 'he' cannot be A'-dependent: An Agree-based Approach", 영어영문학연구, 39(3), pp.109~130 (2013), 대한영어영문학회
- Lebeaux, D, "Relative Clauses, Licensing, and the Nature of the Derivation", NELS, 20(2), pp.318~332 (1990)
- Safir, Ken, "The Syntax of (In)dependence" (2004), MIT Press
- Ueyama, Ayumi, "Two Types of Dependency", 박사, pp.1998