본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국어 재귀사 ‘ziji’의 인칭 제약에 대한 재고찰: 통사적 접근 방식을 중심으로

Rethinking Person Constrains of Mandarin Chinese Reflexive ziji: Focusing on Syntactic Approaches

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

In the linguistics literature, it has been generally agreed that long-distance binding of ziji becomes unavailable if a 1st/2nd person blocker is employed: 1st/2nd person blocking effects. Recently, it turns out that several linguistic factors may give an influence to this effect; hence non-cannonical patterns arise. Focusing on the Agree-based analysis, this paper discusses how those patterns can be explained in a unified way. Especially, we examine the nature of several unexpected patterns by pursuing answers to the questions like (i) why a significant number of Chinese speakers appears not to be sensitive to such blocking, or (ii) why an opposite pattern is even observed given that ziji resists to be co-indexed with a 1st/2nd person non-local antecedent. Concomitantly, it is briefly discussed how discourse-based approaches can be collaborated with the syntactic approaches.

Abstract

In the linguistics literature, it has been generally agreed that long-distance binding of ziji becomes unavailable if a 1st/2nd person blocker is employed: 1st/2nd person blocking effects. Recently, it turns out that several linguistic factors may give an influence to this effect; hence non-cannonical patterns arise. Focusing on the Agree-based analysis, this paper discusses how those patterns can be explained in a unified way. Especially, we examine the nature of several unexpected patterns by pursuing answers to the questions like (i) why a significant number of Chinese speakers appears not to be sensitive to such blocking, or (ii) why an opposite pattern is even observed given that ziji resists to be co-indexed with a 1st/2nd person non-local antecedent. Concomitantly, it is briefly discussed how discourse-based approaches can be collaborated with the syntactic approaches.

참고문헌 (57)

  1. 강은지, "대화 수신 술어와 그 보어절의 유형에 대한 소고: 장거리 결속에서의 주어 지향성을 중심으로", 언어과학, 28(1), pp.1~38 (2021), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  2. 장석진, "조응의 담화 기능: 재귀표현을 중심으로", 한글, 194, pp.121~155 (1986)
  3. 허세문, "한국어 대용어 ‘자기’에 대한 비통합적 접근", 언어학, (70), pp.141~178 (2014), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
  4. 허세문, "‘자기’의 인칭 제약과 그 함의에 대한 소고", 언어와 정보, 24(2), pp.51~76 (2020), 한국언어정보학회[DOI]
  5. Anagnostopoulou, E., "Clitic and Affix Combinations", pp.199~235 (2005), John Benjamins
  6. Anagnostopoulou, E., "The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax", pp.1~41 (2017), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  7. Anand, P., "De de se", Ph. D., pp.2006
  8. Béjar, S., "Romance Linguistics: Theory and Acquisition", pp.49~62 (2003), John Benjamins
  9. Susana Béjar, "Cyclic Agree", Linguistic Inquiry, 40(1), pp.35~73 (2009), MIT Press - Journals[DOI]
  10. Valentina Bianchi, "On the syntax of personal arguments", Lingua, 116(12), pp.2023~2067 (2006), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  11. Bonet, E., "Morphology After Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance", Ph. D., pp.1991
  12. Isabelle Charnavel, "Logophoricity and Locality: A View from French Anaphors", Linguistic Inquiry, 51(4), pp.671~723 (2020), MIT Press - Journals[DOI]
  13. Charnavel, I., "The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax", pp.2321~2402 (2017), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  14. Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  15. Chomsky, N., "Step by Step", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  16. Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
  17. Clements, G., "The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse", Journal of West African Languages, 10, pp.141~177 (1975)
  18. Cole, P., "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. I", pp.21~84 (2006), Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  19. Cole, P., "Principles and Parameters of Long-distance Reflexives", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.1~22 (1990)
  20. Deal, A. R., "Current Models of Agree", Ms, pp.2022
  21. Giblin, I., "Agreement Restrictions in Mandarin Long-distance Binding", Ph. D., pp.2016
  22. Hagège, C., "Les Pronoms Logophoriques", Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 69, pp.287~310 (1974)
  23. Harley, H., "Person and Number in Pronouns: A FeatureGeometric Analysis", Language, 78, pp.482~526 (2002)
  24. Heim, I., "Phi Theory", pp.35~56 (2008), Oxford University Press
  25. Hiraiwa, K., "Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture", Ph. D., pp.2005
  26. Huang, C. -T. J., "Long-distance Reflexives", pp.141~192 (2001), Academic Press
  27. Huang, Y.-H., "Reflexives in Chinese", Studies in Literature and Linguistics, 10, pp.163~188 (1984)
  28. Kuno, S., "Empathy and Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.625~672 (1977)
  29. Li, Y.-H. A., "Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese" (1990), Kluwer
  30. Lidz, J., "Condition R", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.123~140 (2001)
  31. Lihua Pei, "Aspects of Binding Phenomena in Three Chinese Reflexives", 언어과학, 26(2), pp.231~251 (2019), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  32. Liu, C.-S. L., "Anaphora in Mandarin Chinese and Binding at the Interface", Ph. D., pp.1999
  33. Jun Lyu, "Unpacking the blocking effect: Syntactic prominence and perspective-taking in antecedent retrieval in Mandarin Chinese", Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6(1), pp.1~41 (2021), Open Library of the Humanities[DOI]
  34. Miyagawa, S., "Agreement Beyond Phi" (2017), MIT Press
  35. Andrew Nevins, "The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25(2), pp.273~313 (2007), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  36. Oshima, D. Y., "Perspectives in Reported Discourse", Ph. D., pp.2006
  37. Pan, H., "Long-distance Reflexives", pp.279~316 (2001), Academic Press
  38. Roumyana Pancheva, "The Person Case Constraint", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 36(4), pp.1291~1337 (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  39. Park, Y., "Attitude De Se and Logophoricity", Ph. D., pp.2018
  40. Pearson, H., "The Interpretation of the Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe", Natural Language Semantics, 23, pp.77~128 (2015)[DOI]
  41. Pesetsky, D., "Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation", pp.262~294 (2007), John Benjamins
  42. Pollard, C., "Anaphors in English and the Scope of the Binding Theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 23, pp.261~303 (1992)
  43. Carl Pollard, "Chinese Reflexive ziji: Syntactic Reflexives vs. Non-syntactic Reflexives", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 7(4), pp.287~318 (1998), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  44. Preminger, O, "Agreement and Its Failures" (2014), MIT Press
  45. Progovac, L., "Long-distance Reflexives : Movement-to-Infl versus Relativized SUBJECT", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.755~772 (1993)
  46. Reinhart, T., "Reflexivity", Linguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
  47. Reuland, E., "Primitives of Binding", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.439~492 (2001)
  48. Reuland, E., "Anaphora and Language Design" (2011), MIT Press
  49. Reuland, E., "How the Complexity of Mandarin zi-ji Simplifies the Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 51, pp.799~814 (2019)
  50. Rizzi, L., "On the Anaphor Agreement Effect", Rivista di Linguistica, 2, pp.27~42 (1990)
  51. Schlenker, P., "The Handbook of Semantics", pp.1561~1604 (2011), Mouton de Gruyter
  52. Sells, P., "Aspects of Logophoricity", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.445~481 (1987)
  53. Stalnaker, R., "Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9", pp.315~322 (1978), New York Academic Press
  54. Tang, C.-C. J., "Chinese Reflexives", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, pp.93~121 (1989)
  55. Yingying Wang, "Empathy and Chinese long distance reflexive ziji—remarks on Giorgi (2006, 2007)", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 33(1), pp.307~322 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  56. Woolford, E., "More on the Anaphor Agreement Effect", Linguistic Inquiry, 30, pp.257~287 (1999)
  57. Zribi-Hertz, A., "Anaphor Binding and Narrative Point of View", Language, 65, pp.695~727 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)