Which way forward for East Asian regional integration? - CGE Model Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Among various distinctive formulations that have been developed simultaneously in East Asia as of 2009, this paper selected three major paths, ASEAN+3, ASEAN+6 and APEC, to quantitatively examine the economic impacts of Asian regionalization with the CGE model. This paper confirmed previous findings such as the magnitude of economic impact being proportional to the size of membership and the existence of trade diversion effect within alltrade blocs. The subsequent KORUS and Korea-EU FTA imposition upon the built CGE base models further verified the effects of hub-and-spoke-ism in East Asia. Jointly, the simulation results implied that the economic impacts of a trade arrangement heavily depend on the subject economy’s reliance on trade with the participating states. It was also found that the impacts were directly proportional to the accrued trade balance of the subject spoke country with both the hub state and the hub-destination. This could have been exaggerated as the scope of this study was limited to East Asia where KORUS FTA was found to be more influential than Korea-EU FTA due to its exceptionally high reliance on the US. On the course of this research to verify the aforementioned findings, however, both GTAP 6 and 7 were adopted, and hence, the economic impacts of China’s accession to the WTO in the global trade system were also empirically proven.
Abstract
Among various distinctive formulations that have been developed simultaneously in East Asia as of 2009, this paper selected three major paths, ASEAN+3, ASEAN+6 and APEC, to quantitatively examine the economic impacts of Asian regionalization with the CGE model. This paper confirmed previous findings such as the magnitude of economic impact being proportional to the size of membership and the existence of trade diversion effect within alltrade blocs. The subsequent KORUS and Korea-EU FTA imposition upon the built CGE base models further verified the effects of hub-and-spoke-ism in East Asia. Jointly, the simulation results implied that the economic impacts of a trade arrangement heavily depend on the subject economy’s reliance on trade with the participating states. It was also found that the impacts were directly proportional to the accrued trade balance of the subject spoke country with both the hub state and the hub-destination. This could have been exaggerated as the scope of this study was limited to East Asia where KORUS FTA was found to be more influential than Korea-EU FTA due to its exceptionally high reliance on the US. On the course of this research to verify the aforementioned findings, however, both GTAP 6 and 7 were adopted, and hence, the economic impacts of China’s accession to the WTO in the global trade system were also empirically proven.
참고문헌 (39)
- Baker, James, "The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War and Peace: 1989-1992" (1992), New York. NY: Putnams
- Badri, Narayanan G., "What’s New in GTAP 7?", Information Booklet: Chapter 3 from GTAP 7, ~ (2009)
- Baldwin,Richard E., "The Spoke Trap: Hub-and-Spoke Bilateralism in East Asia from China, Asia and the New World Economy with Barry Eichengreen. Yong-chol Park and Charles Wyplosz", Graduate Institute of International Studies. Geneva, ~ (2007)
- Open Regionalism, "Bergsten, C.", Peterson Institute for International Economics, ~, pp.No. PB09-16 (2009)
- "Free Trade Today", Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
- Breslin, S., "Studying Regions: Assessing the New, Learning from the Old", New Political Economy, 5(3), pp.333~353 (2000)
- Brown, D.K., "CGE Modeling and Analysis of Multilateral and Regional Negotiating Options (Working Paper). to be published in R.M. Stern (ed.). Issues and Options for US-Japan Trade Policies", University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor. Forthcoming
- Cheong, Inkyo, "Korea’s FTA Strategies. KIEP Report. 2005. Evaluation of Recent Progress of FTAs in East Asia – a Korean perspective from East Asian Economic Regionalism – Feasibilities and Challenges. co-edited by Choong Yong Ahn and Richard E" (2005), Baldwin. Springer
- Dent, Christopher M., "East Asian Regionalism" (2008), Routledge
- Findley, C., "Old Issues in New Regionalism", the 2000 APEC Economic Outlook Symposium. Manila, Philippines (2000)
- Garnaut, R., "Open Regionalism and Trade Liberalization: An Asia-Pacific Contribution to the World Trade System", Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1~41 (1996)
- IMF Asia and Pacific Department, "Intra-regional Trade Key to Asia’s Export Boom", Asian Exports. IMF Magazine, ~ (2008)
- ASEAN+3 or ASEAN+6: Which Way Forward?. Asian Development Bank Institute Discussion Paper No. 77. 2008. Regionalism as an Engine of Multilateralism: a Case for a Single East Asian FTA, "Kawai, M.", Asian Development Ban, ~, pp.No. 14 (2008)
- Kim,C., "Towards an East Asian Free Trade Agreement", the JEF, 2003, ~
- Kwon, Youngmin, "Regional Community-building in East Asia" (2002), Yonsei University Press
- Lee, Chang Jae, "From East Asian FTAs to an EAFTA", pp.6~1 (2006), KIEP.Policy Analysis
- Lee, Min Ha, "ASEAN+3, ASEAN+6, or APEC FTA for EAST Asia? - CGE Model Analysis", Master, Graduate School of International Studies, pp.2009
- Nam,S., "APEC Trade Liberalization after EVSL", KIEP APEC Study Series 00-07, ~ (2000)
- OECD, "Regional Integration in the Asia Pacific: Issues and Prospects", the Bob Hawke Prime Ministerial Center at the University of South Australia, ~ (2005)
- Wonnacott, R., "Trade and Investment in a Hub-and-Spoke System versus a Free Trade Area", World Economy, 통권 : 19, pp.237~52 (1996)
- Yip, Wei Kiat, "Prospects for Closer Economic Integration in East Asia. Greater East Asia", Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs, 통권 : 1, pp.106~111 (2001)
- Yue,Chia Siow, "Challenges and Configurations of a Region-wide FTA in East Asia", the FONDAD Conference. Kuala Lumpur (2007), Singapore Institute of International Affairs
- "APEC"[URL]
- "ASEAN"[URL]
- "Australia"[URL]
- "EU"[URL]
- "India"[URL]
- "Japan"[URL]
- "Korea"[URL]
- "New Zealand"[URL]
- "US"[URL]
- "WTO"[URL]
- "Bank of Korea"[URL]
- "KITA"[URL]
- "Korea National Statistical Office"[URL]
- "IMF"[URL]
- "UN Comtrade"[URL]
- "World Bank"[URL]