Investment Promotive Effects of Mega-FTAs on the Cooperative Game for Eurasia Initiative
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The policy choices of Eurasian states whether to form a coalition along with the “Eurasia Initiative” can be explained by the cooperative game theory. While the each bilateral relationship before making a binding agreement seems to be a non-cooperative game, the coalitions with many other states through a binding agreement of Mega-FTA would be a cooperative game. Despite the lack of numerical data, this study at least tries to show the possibility of applying the game theory to analyze the “Eurasia Initiative” and it’s the impacts of Mega-FTAs on this ambition. While the Eurasia Initiative necessarily involves some economic projects requiring enough investment promotion, Korea can strategically set up the policies linked with the development of Mega-FTAs. To utilize the investment promotive effect of Mega-FTAs, Korea has to assure that the core of the cooperation game would be the grand coalition of a Mega-FTA. If it continues to search for the best policies to maximize the superadditivity of this cooperative game, Korea will finally be able to achieve the co-promotion of Mega-FTAs and the Eurasia Initiative.
Abstract
The policy choices of Eurasian states whether to form a coalition along with the “Eurasia Initiative” can be explained by the cooperative game theory. While the each bilateral relationship before making a binding agreement seems to be a non-cooperative game, the coalitions with many other states through a binding agreement of Mega-FTA would be a cooperative game. Despite the lack of numerical data, this study at least tries to show the possibility of applying the game theory to analyze the “Eurasia Initiative” and it’s the impacts of Mega-FTAs on this ambition. While the Eurasia Initiative necessarily involves some economic projects requiring enough investment promotion, Korea can strategically set up the policies linked with the development of Mega-FTAs. To utilize the investment promotive effect of Mega-FTAs, Korea has to assure that the core of the cooperation game would be the grand coalition of a Mega-FTA. If it continues to search for the best policies to maximize the superadditivity of this cooperative game, Korea will finally be able to achieve the co-promotion of Mega-FTAs and the Eurasia Initiative.
참고문헌 (35)
- Ahn, Sanghoon, "The economic impacts of outbound FDI and trade: the case of Korea", OECD Workshop on the Globalisation of Production: Impacts on Employment, Productivity and Economic Growth (2005)
- Alford, R., "The Convergence of International Trade and Investment Arbitration", Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 12(1) (2014)
- Berger, "Do trade and investment agreements lead to more FDI? Accounting for key provisions inside the black box", International Economics and Economic Policy, 10(2), pp.247~250 (2013)
- Borensztein, Eduardo, "How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?", Journal of international Economics, 45(1), pp.115~135 (1998)
- Branzei, "Models in Cooperative Game Theory" (2008), Springer
- A Handbook of Korea’s Investment Treaties, "Byun, Pil-gun", the Ministry of Justice, ~ (2010)
- Cheong, Inkyo, "The Prospects for Korea’s Participation for Mega FTAs in the Asia Pacific Region", CNCPEC Seminar (2013)
- Cochinard, S., "Game Theory and Economic Analysis" (2002), Routledge
- D’Aspremont, Claude, "Game Theory and Economic Analysis" (2002), Routledge
- Footer, M., "Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Gilles, R., "The Cooperative Game Theory of Networks and Hierarchies" (2010), Springer
- Head, K., "Overseas investment and firm exports", Review of International Economics, 9(1), pp.108~122 (2001)
- Houde, Kolse-Patil, "The Interaction between Investment and Services Chapters in Selected Regional Trade Agreements", 55(6) (2007), OECD Publishing
- 허난이, "BIT와 FTA 투자챕터의 비교 및 시사점- 한국의 양자투자규범 협상을 위한 정책적 분석 -", 통상법률, 122, pp.55~89 (2015), 법무부
- "Park urges N. Korea to join Eurasia Initiative" (2015)[URL]
- Kim, June-Dong, "The Role of Foreign Direct Investment in East Asian Economic Development", pp.267~294 (2000), University of Chicago Press
- Kim, Seungjin, "The Role of Foreign Direct Investment in East Asian Economic Development", pp.295~317 (2000), University of Chicago Press
- "Beyond Geopolitics: South Korea’s Eurasia Initiative as a New Nordpolitik" (2015)[URL]
- "South Korea's Eurasia Ambitions" (2014)[URL]
- Lesher, M., "Analysis of the Economic Impact of Investment Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements", OECD Trade Policy Papers, (36) (2006), OECD Publishing
- Lewis, M., "TPP and RCEP: Implications of Mega-FTAs for Global Governance" (2015), Trans-Pacific Partnership
- Lipsey, Robert E., "Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics", pp.333~382 (2004), University of Chicago Press
- Lo, C., "A Comparison of BIT and the Investment Chapter of Free Trade Agreement from Policy Perspective", Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, 3(1), pp.147~170 (2008)
- McCain, R., "Game Theory: A Nontechnical Introduction to the Analysis of Strategy" (2010), World Scientific Publishing
- Miroudot, S., "Preferential Trade Agreement Policies for Development", pp.31~320 (2011), The World Bank
- "EurAsia Initiative"[URL]
- Mostafa, G., "The Concept of ‘Eurasia’: Kazakhstan’s Eurasian Policy and Its Implications", Journal of Eurasian Studies, 4, pp.160~170 (2013)
- Moulin, H., "Game Theory and Economic Analysis" (2002), Routledge
- Chapter 2 – Can RCEP and the TPP be Path Ways to FTAAP?, State of Trade in the Region Report, "Petri", Pacific Economic Cooperation Council, ~ (2014)
- Qingjiang, K., "Bilateral Investment Rule-Making: BITs or FTAs with Investment Rules?", The Journal of World Investment and Trade, 14, pp.638~645 (2013)
- Sornarajah, M., "The International Law on Foreign Investment" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Schwab, S., "The Rationale behind Mega-Regionals – Two View", Mega-Regional Trade Agreement: Game-Changers or Costly Distractions for the World Trading System?, World Economic Forum, pp.18~21 (2014)
- Trends in International Investment Agreement; An Overview, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement, "UNCTAD", United Nations, ~ (1999)
- Scope and Definition, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement, "UNCTAD", United Nations, ~ (2011)
- Weirich, P., "Collective Rationality: Equilibrium in Cooperative Games" (2010), Oxford University Press