국제관계 이론을 통한 한국의 공공외교 분석
An Analysis of Korea's Public Diplomacy through the Theories of International Relations
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Because public diplomacy is where the discipline of international communication meets that of international relations, the area has been studied by both fields. But genuine efforts to bring these two schools together for a converging theory building has been rather scarce. Communication scholars used media and public opinion theories mostly to analyze the phenomenon, while IR scholars generally adopted theories on power and identity for that purpose. Hence, this study aims to bridge that gap by analyzing key dimensions of public diplomacy through IR theories. More specifically, this research starts with the assumption that three key dimensions of PD -- informational, reputational, and relational -- can be explained by the three grand IR theories -- realism, liberalism and constructivism. Informational PD is based on realism in that it focuses on message competition among state actors in a zero-sum game for power and capabilities. Relational PD can find its roots in liberalism in that it stresses multilateral cooperation among state and non-state actors for genuine relationship building. Reputational PD is based on constructivism in that it concentrates on identity and image formation of state actors through advertising, branding and other reputation building activities that affect global discourses. Through an analysis of Korea's eight key PD cases in recent years, this exploratory study attempted to establish robust links between the three PD dimensions and three IR theories.
Abstract
Because public diplomacy is where the discipline of international communication meets that of international relations, the area has been studied by both fields. But genuine efforts to bring these two schools together for a converging theory building has been rather scarce. Communication scholars used media and public opinion theories mostly to analyze the phenomenon, while IR scholars generally adopted theories on power and identity for that purpose, Hence, this study aims to bridge that gap by analyzing key dimensions of PD through IR theories. Most specifically, this research starts with the assumption that three key dimensions of PD -- information, reputation and relation -- can be explained by three grand IR theories -- realism, liberalism, and constructivism. Informational PD is based on realism in that it focuses on message competition among state actors in a zero-sum game for power and capabilities. Relational PD can fits its roots in liberalism in that it stresses multilateral cooperation among state and non-state actors for genuine relationship building. Reputational PD is based on constructivism in that it concentrates on identity and image formation of state actors through advertising, branding and other reputation building activities that affect global discourses. Through an analysis of Korea's eight key PD cases in recent years, this exploratory study attempted to establish robust links between the three PD dimensions and the three IR theories.
참고문헌 (57)
- Abbott, K., "Why states act through formal international organizations", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(1), pp.3~32 (1998)
- Anholt, S., "Forward", Journal of Brand Management, 9(4-5), pp.229~239 (2002)
- Anholt, S., "Brand new justice: The upside of global marketing" (2003), Butterworth
- Anholt, S., "International public relations and public diplomacy", pp.189~208 (2015), Peter Lang
- Axelrod, R., "Cooperation under anarchy", pp.226~254 (1986), Princeton University Press
- Kadir Ayhan, "Rethinking Korea's Middle Power Diplomacy as a Nation Branding Project", Korea Observer, 50(1), pp.1~24 (2019), 한국학술연구원[DOI]
- Bennett, L., "Toward a theory of press-state relations in the U.S.", Journal of Communication, 40(2), pp.103~125 (1990)
- Choi, G., "People, public diplomacy in the age of fourth industrial revolution" (2018), Gwangjin Munhwasa
- Coombs, W., "Ongoing crisis communication" (2012), Sage
- Cull, N., "Public diplomacy taxonomies and histories", The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, pp.31~54 (2008)
- Cull, N., "Public relations: Lessons from the past" (2009), Figueroa Press
- Cull, N., "The long road to public diplomacy 2.0: The Internet in U.S. public diplomacy", International Studies Review, 15, pp.123~139 (2013)
- Dahlen, O., "Modernity and the development of public relations in Norway: Influences and interactions", Public Relations Review, 45, pp.192~201 (2019)
- d’Hooghe, I., "The New public diplomacy", pp.88~105 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Entman, R. M., "Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy" (2004), University of Chicago Press
- Entman, R. M., "Theorizing media public diplomacy: The U.S. case", The International Journal of Press, 2008, pp.13, 87~102
- Gilboa, E., "Global communication and foreign policy", Journal of Communication, 52(4), pp.731~748 (2002)
- Gilboa, E., "Searching for a theory of public diplomacy", Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, pp.55~77 (2008)
- Golan, G., "An integrated approach to public diplomacy", American Behavioral Scientist, 57(9), pp.1251~1255 (2013)
- Golan, G., "International public relations and public diplomacy", pp.1~12 (2015), Peter Lang
- Cowan, G., "Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy", The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, pp.10~30 (2008)
- Dinnie, K., "Nation branding" (2008), Elsevier
- Grunig, J., "Public relations and international affairs: Effects, ethics and responsibility", Journal of International Affairs, 47(1), pp.137~161 (1993)
- Grunig, J., "Public relations research: An international perspective", pp.3~48 (1997), International Thomson Business
- Grunig, J., "Handbook of public relations", pp.11~32 (2001), Sage
- Grunig, J., "Managing Public Relations" (1984), Holt, Reinhart and Winston
- van Ham, P., "Branding territory: inside the wonderful world of PR and IR theory", Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 31(2), pp.249~269 (2002)
- van Ham, P., "The new public diplomacy", pp.47~66 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Van Ham, P., "Place branding: The state of the art", The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, pp.126~149 (2008)
- Henrikson, A., "The new public diplomacy", pp.67~87 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Karns, M., "International organizations: The politics and processes of global governance" (2015), Lynne Rienner
- Taehwan Kim, "Paradigm Shift in Diplomacy: A Conceptual Model for Korea’s “New Public Diplomacy”", Korea Observer, 43(4), pp.527~555 (2012), 한국학술연구원
- Kim, T., "The direction of policy public diplomacy toward the U.S. with a comparative perspective", A proposal for the Foreign Ministry’s Policy Public Diplomacy Expert Seminar (2019)
- Keohane, R., "After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy" (1984), Princeton University Press
- Keohane, R., "Transnational relations and world politics" (1971), Harvard University Press
- Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Diplomatic white paper 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019", pp.2019~ (2019), Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- 이병종, "History of Korea's Public Diplomacy: From Message Dissemination to Relation Cultivation", Asian Communication Research, 16(3), pp.75~115 (2019), 한국언론학회[DOI]
- L’Etang, J., "Critical Perspectives in public relations", pp.14~34 (1996), International Thomson Business Press
- Melissen, J., "The new public diplomacy", pp.3~27 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Nye, J., "Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power" (1990), Basic Books
- Nye, J., "Soft power: The means to success in world politics" (2004), Public Affairs
- Nye, J., "Public diplomacy and soft power", The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, pp.94~109 (2008)
- Olins, W., "The new public diplomacy", pp.47~66 (2007), Palgrave Macmillan
- Sevin, E., "Pathways of connection: An analytical approach to the impact of public diplomacy", Public Relations Review, 41(4), pp.562~568 (2015)
- Signitzer, B., "Public relations and public diplomacy: Conceptual divergence", Public Relations Review, 18(2), pp.137~147 (1992)
- Snow, N., "Routledge handbook of public diplomacy", pp.3~11 (2009), Routledge
- Waltz, K., "Theory of international politics" (1979), Addison-Wesley
- Wang, J., "Telling the American story to the world: The purpose of U.S. public diplomacy in historical perspective", Public Relations Review, 33, pp.21~30 (2007)
- Wang, J., "Strategic public diplomacy and local press: How a high-profile head of state was covered in America’s heartland", Public Relations Review, 30, pp.11~24 (2004)
- Wendt, A., "Collective identity formation and the international state", American Political Science Review, 88(summer), pp.384~396 (1994)
- Wanta, W., "Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations", Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), pp.364~377 (2004)
- Winkler, A., "The Office of War Information 1942-1945" (1978), Yale University Press
- Wolper, G., "Wilsonian public diplomacy: The Committee on Public Information in Spain", Diplomatic History, 17(1), pp.17~33 (1993)
- Yun, S., "Toward public relations theory-based study of public diplomacy: Testing the applicability of the excellence study", Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(4), pp.287~312 (2006)
- Yun, S., "Future sociological public diplomacy and the role of public relations", American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), pp.493~503 (2009)
- Zaharna, R., "Reassessing whose story wins: The trajectory of identity resilience in narrative contests", International Journal of Communication, 10, pp.4407~4438 (2016)
- Zhang, J., "China’s agenda building and image polishing in the U.S.: Assessing an international public relations campaign", Public Relations Review, 29(1), pp.13~28 (2003)