본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

从国际法院新判例来重新认识南沙群岛主权之争

Analysis of the Sovereign Disputes over Nansha Islands (Spratly Islands): Guided by the Case Law of the ICJ

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Abstract

Although it is still unpredictable for the disputants to submit the disputes over the sovereignty of the Nansha Islands (Spratly Islands) to the ICJ, it is possible and even necessary to analyze the disputes based on the case law of the ICJ. The analysis would certainly help the disputants to reassess their claims and legal justifications and hopefully work out a settlement plan. The recent ICJ case of Sovereignty over Pulau Litigan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia v. Malaysia)(Indonesia v. Malaysia) embodies many legal implications for settlement of the territorial disputes in the South China Sea.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 张良福, "中国与邻国海洋划界争端问题", 博士, pp.1997
  2. 邓小平, "邓小平理论研究资料 第四卷" (1997), 中共中央党校出版社
  3. 李国强, "对解决南沙群岛主权争议几个方案的解析", 中国边疆史地研究, 10 (2000)
  4. C. Liu., "Chinese Sovereignty and Joint Development: A Pragmatic Solution to the Spratly Islands Dispute'", Loy. L. A. Int'l & Comp. L. J, 18 (1996)
  5. Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), , ICJ, ~ (1962)
  6. H. H. L. R. Jr, "China's Claim to the Spratlys Islands'", J. Energy Nat. Resources, 15 (1997)
  7. "The Island of Palmas (U.S. v. Neth.), Perm. Ct. Arb", AJIL, 22 (1928)
  8. T. Kh, "Law of the Sea Convention: Implications for Singapore", Straits Times, ~ (1994)
  9. B. K. Murphy, "Dangerous Ground: The Spratly Islands and International Law'", Ocean & Coastal L. J, 1 (1995)
  10. S. R. Jennings, "The Acquisition of Territory in International Law" (1962), Manchester University Press
  11. B. T. Sumner, "Territorial Disputes at the International Court of Justice", Duke L. J, 53 (2004)
  12. ICJ Reports 2002, , ~ (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)