다산 정약용의 주역 해석방법론 체계 - 易理四法, 三易, 「讀易要旨」 18則의 상호관계를 중심으로 -

Abstract

‘Two schools and six sects(兩派六宗)’ refers to schools divided by the philosophical differences, which have the methodological differences of interpreting the meaning of Zhouyi’s phrases such as the judgement, the lines, the image deduced from the philosophical viewpoints. Jeong Yag-yong(丁若鏞) presents four methods of interpretation of Zhouyi(易理四法), three changes(三易), and eighteen interpretation rules(18則) as a methodology of interpreting Zhouyi’s phrases. This essay is to aim at giving a general description on them and examines their position and mutual relationship of interpretive methodology which consists of three parts. For the purpose of doing this, this essay will make a methodical division into wenli(文理) and yili(易理). Because Zhouyi is the Classic that combined a written language and a symbolic language such as guaxiang(卦象) and yaoxiang(爻象), and Jeong Yakyong(丁若鏞) has the emblemo-numerological views that Zhouyi’s phrases are formed from these emblems(xiang). Categorical understandings on the eighteen interpretation rules may be divided, in connection with four methods of interpretation of Zhouyi that belongs to Jeong Yakyong’ unique interpretive method, such as 1)two rules related with the Tuiyi(推移, hexagram transformation) theory and the Yaobian(爻變) theory, 2)seven rules related with the Wuxiang(物象, image of things) theory. But the Huti(互體, interlocked body) theory does not have a concrete relationship with the eighteen interpretation rules. 3)Four rules related with general yili are mainly related with basic structures and semantic structures of Zhouyi’s phrases. And there are two rules related with wenli. The eighteen interpretation rules don’t have a consistency with four methods of interpretation of Zhouyi and three changes. But it can be said that they are interpretation rules to have a systematical structure establishing by the Zhouyi’s philosophical point of view.