본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전치사 de를 동반하는 스페인어 소비동사의 상적 특성

The aspectual properties of Spanish Consumption Verbs with the prepostion de

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Zato(2014)는 스페인어의 소비동사(consumption verbs)인 comer, beber, fumar 등은 주어가 소비하고자 하는 대상을 취하고자하는 근원을 표현하기 위해 전치사 de를 사용하고 그근원은 소비대상 그 자체이므로 결과적으로는 부분적 해석(partitive reading)을 가짐에 따라 내재논항은 부분적 소비가 이루어진다고 한다. Zato는 전치사 de가 나타나는 구조를 소위 시도구조교호(conative alternation)의 일환으로 보고 이러한 구조에서는 상적 전환(aspectual changes)을 유발한다고 언급하지만 Vázquez et al.(2000)은 스페인어에서는 이러한 시도구조교호는 존재하지 않는다고 단언한다. 본 연구는 스페인어의 소비동사가 전치사 de를 동반하는경우 시도구조교호가 아님을 증명하고 소비동사의 상적 해석은 동사의 보어위치에 생성되는P[±SOURCE]의 문자화 조건과 밀접하게 연관됨을 분산형태론(Distributed Morphology: Halle & Marantz(1993))적 접근을 통해 그 도출구조를 제안하고자 한다.

Abstract

Zato(2014) argues that Spanish consumption verbs, such as comer(‘eat’), beber(‘drink’) or fumar(‘smoke’), resort to the preposition de(‘from’) in order to express the place from which the subject takes the substance to consume because this place is the same as the substance itself and its consequence is a partitive reading. According to this perspective, the internal argument is partially consumed. Zato considers that the optional realization of the preposition de in the consumption verb construction can be treated as a Conative Alternation and this alternation produces aspectual changes. However Vazquez et al.(2000) say that this sort of structure is not possible. In this paper we will try to show that the consumption verb involved with the preposition de is not a kind of Conative Alternation. Based on the Distributed Morphology(Halle & Marantz(1993)), we will show that the aspectual interpretation of the consumption verb construction is crucially related to the spell-out condition of P[±SOURCE] in its complement position.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Ackerman, F., "A Theory of Predicates" (1998), CSLI Publications
  2. Semantic information in se-constructions in Spanish, "Almagro, A. M.", University of Trondheim, 136~154, pp.University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics: Grammar and the Lexicon, 16 (1993)
  3. Baker, M., "Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing" (1988), The University of Chicago Press
  4. Beavers, J., "Argument", oblique alternations and the structure of lexical meaning, Stanford University at Stanford, pp.Department of Linguistics, 2006
  5. Beavers, J., "The Structure of Lexical Meaning: Why Semantics Really Matters", The University of Texas at Austin, ~ (2008)
  6. Beavers, J., "Multiple incremental themes and figure", path relations, 2008, pp.18, 90~107
  7. Beavers, J., "The structure of lexical meaning: why semantics really matters", Language, 86(4), pp.821~864 (2010)
  8. Beavers, J., "Several problems for predicate decompositions", Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32 (2011)
  9. Bobcock, S., "The Syntax of Spanish Reflexive Verb: The parameters of the middle voice" (1970), Mouton
  10. Booij, G., "The Boundary between Morphology and Syntax: Separable Complex Verbs in Dutch", Yearbook of Morphology, 3, pp.45~63 (1990)
  11. Broccias, C., "The English change network: Focusing changes into schemas" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
  12. Dowty, D., "Word Meaning and Montague Grammar" (1979), Reidel
  13. Dowty, D., "Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
  14. Guerssel, M., "A cross-linguistic study of transitivity alternations", Chicago Linguistic Society, 21(2), pp.48~63 (1985)
  15. Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), University of Chicago Press
  16. Halle, M., "The View from Building 20", pp.111~176 (1993), MIT Press
  17. Jackendoff, R., "The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14, pp.305~354 (1996)
  18. Johnson, K., "Object Positions", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9, pp.577~636 (1991)
  19. Koopman, H., "On Verbs That Fail to Undergo V-Second", Linguistic Inquiry, 26, pp.139~163 (1995)
  20. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., "The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact, 2", pp.523~568 (2001), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  21. Levin, B., "English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation" (1993), University of Chicago Press
  22. Mairal Usón, R., "New challenges for lexical representation within the Lexical-Constructional Model (LCM)", Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 57, pp.137~158 (2008)
  23. MacDonald, J. E., "The syntax of inner aspect", 박사, Department of Linguistics, pp.2006
  24. Neeleman, A., "Complex Predicates", 박사, pp.1994
  25. Neeleman, A., "The Balance between Syntax and Morphology: Dutch Particles and Resultatives", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11, pp.433~475 (1993)
  26. Nishida, C., "The Spanish reflexive clitic se as an aspectual class marker", Linguistics, 32, pp.425~458 (1994)
  27. Ramchand, G. C., "Aktionsart, L-syntax and Selection", 석사, pp.2002
  28. Riemsdijk, H. van, "A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness" (1978), Foris
  29. Rutkowsky, P, "The Syntactic Structure of Grammaticalized Partitives(Pseudopartitives)", U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics, 13(1), pp.337~350 (2007)
  30. Sanz, M., "Event and Predication" (2000), John Benjamins
  31. Schroten, J., "Concerning the deep structures of Spanish reflexive sentences" (1972), Mouton
  32. Stickney, H., "The pseudopartitive and its illusory projections", 석사, pp.2004
  33. Stiebels, B., "Morphology feeds syntax: the case of particle verbs", Linguistics, 32, pp.913~968 (1994)
  34. Tenny, C., "Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness", 박사, Department of Linguistics, pp.1987
  35. Van der Leek, F., "The English conative construction: A compositional account", Chicago Linguistic Society, 32, pp.363~378 (1996)
  36. Van Hout, A., "Papers from the UPenn", MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect, MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect, pp.1998, 32[DOI]
  37. Van Valin, R.D.Jr., "Syntax: structure, meaning and function" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  38. Vázquez, "Dealing with lexical semantic mismatches between Spanish and English", Knowledge based on Computer system, Proceedings of the International Conference KBC2000, pp.308~319 (2000)
  39. Verkuyl, Henk J., "On the compositional nature of the aspects" (1972), Reidel
  40. Verkuyl, Henk J., "Aspectual classes and aspectual composition", Linguistics and Philosophy, 2, pp.39~94 (1995)
  41. Wiese, R., "The phonology of German" (1996), Clarendon Press
  42. Zato, Z., "Qualia Structure in Spanish Prepositional verbs: When the verb resorts to a preposition", An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 3(1), pp.49~81 (2014)
  43. Zeller, J., "How syntax restricts the lexicon: particles as thematic predicates", 석사, pp.1998

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)