Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: The Effect of Regret on Travelers' Dynamic Carpooling Decisions
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has severely curtailed travelers' willingness to carpool and complicatedthe psychological processing system of travelers' carpooling decisions. In the post-COVID-19 era, a two-stagedecision model under dynamic decision scenarios is constructed by tracking the psychological states of subjectsin the face of multi-scenario carpooling decisions. Through a scenario experiment method, this paperinvestigates how three psychological variables, travelers' psychological distance to COVID-19, anticipatedregret, and experienced regret about carpooling decisions, affect their willingness to carpool and re-carpool. The results show that in the initial carpooling decision, travelers' perception gap of anticipated regret positivelypredicts carpooling willingness and partially mediates between psychological distance to COVID-19 andcarpooling willingness; in the re-carpooling decision, travelers' perception gap of anticipated regret mediatesin the process of experienced regret influencing re-carpooling willingness; the inhibitory effect of experiencedregret on carpooling in the context of COVID-19 is stronger than its facilitative effect on carpoolingwillingness. This paper tries to offer a fact-based decision-processing system for travelers.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has severely curtailed travelers' willingness to carpool and complicatedthe psychological processing system of travelers' carpooling decisions. In the post-COVID-19 era, a two-stagedecision model under dynamic decision scenarios is constructed by tracking the psychological states of subjectsin the face of multi-scenario carpooling decisions. Through a scenario experiment method, this paperinvestigates how three psychological variables, travelers' psychological distance to COVID-19, anticipatedregret, and experienced regret about carpooling decisions, affect their willingness to carpool and re-carpool. The results show that in the initial carpooling decision, travelers' perception gap of anticipated regret positivelypredicts carpooling willingness and partially mediates between psychological distance to COVID-19 andcarpooling willingness; in the re-carpooling decision, travelers' perception gap of anticipated regret mediatesin the process of experienced regret influencing re-carpooling willingness; the inhibitory effect of experiencedregret on carpooling in the context of COVID-19 is stronger than its facilitative effect on carpoolingwillingness. This paper tries to offer a fact-based decision-processing system for travelers.
참고문헌 (23)
- T. P. Liang, "What drives consumers to adopt a sharing platform : an integrated model of value-based and transaction cost theories", Information & Management, 58(4) (2021)[DOI]
- M. Alharthi, ""Your ride has arrived"–exploring the nexus between subjective well-being, socio-cultural beliefs, COVID-19, and the sharing economy", Telematics and Informatics, 63 (2021)[DOI]
- A. Konig, "Travellers’ willingness to share rides in autonomous mobility on demand systems depending on travel distance and detour", Travel Behaviour and Society, 21, pp.188~202 (2020)[DOI]
- J. T. Bastos, "Is organized carpooling safer? Speeding and distracted driving behaviors from a naturalistic driving study in Brazil", Accident Analysis & Prevention, 152 (2021)[DOI]
- Y. Park, "Who is interested in carpooling and why : the importance of individual characteristics, role preferences and carpool markets", Transportation Research Record, 2672(8), pp.708~718 (2018)[DOI]
- M. Hossain, "The effect of the Covid-19 on sharing economy activities", Journal of Cleaner Production, 280 (2021)[DOI]
- F. Bachmann, "What drives people to carpool? Explaining carpooling intention from the perspectives of carpooling passengers and drivers", Transportation Research Part F : Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, pp.260~268 (2018)[DOI]
- N. Schwarz, "The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior", pp.119~145 (1996), Guilford
- X. Wang, "Effects of regulatory focus and emotions on information preferences : the affect-as-information perspective", Frontiers in Psychology, 11 (2020)[DOI]
- J. Landman, "Regret: The Persistence of the Possible" (1993), Oxford University Press
- J. Van der Pligt, "Affect, attitudes and decisions : let's be more specific", European Review of Social Psychology, 8(1), pp.33~66 (1997)[DOI]
- J. Zheng, "Willingness to pay for reductions in health risks under anticipated regret", Journal of Health Economics, 78 (2021)[DOI]
- T. Gilovich, "The experience of regret : what, when, and why", Psychological Review, 102(2), pp.379~395 (1995)[DOI]
- C. Abraham, "Acting on intentions : the role of anticipated regret", British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(4), pp.495~511 (2003)[DOI]
- F. Marcatto, "Once bitten, twice shy : experienced regret and non-adaptive choice switching", PeerJ, 3 (2015)[DOI]
- H. Lin, "Effects of experienced regret on risky decision making are dependent on risky degree", Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(3), pp.339~347 (2021)[DOI]
- J. Zhang, "A preliminary study of the effect of mental distance in regret processing", Psychological Science, 8(3), pp.255~258 (1997)
- S. Wang, "The interplay of travelers’ psychological distance, language abstraction, and message appeal type in social media advertising", Journal of Travel Research, 59(8), pp.1430~1446 (2020)[DOI]
- N. Liberman, "The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions : a test of temporal construal theory", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), pp.5~18 (1998)[DOI]
- Y. Bar-Anan, "The association between psychological distance and construal level : evidence from an implicit association test", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 135(4), pp.609~622 (2006)[DOI]
- A. Spence, "The psychological distance of climate change", Risk Analysis : An International Journal, 32(6), pp.957~972 (2012)[DOI]
- J. J. Inman, "Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions : the attenuating role of decision justifiability", Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), pp.116~128 (2022)[DOI]
- R. M. Baron, "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986)[DOI]
