본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The economic analysis of national and global interest politics for international environmental standards

The Economic Analysis of National and Global Interest Politics for International Environmental Standards

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

This study presents the political economics models to explore the political landscape of special interest groups influencing the government's decision making process for implementing international environmental standard. Starting with the popular menu-auction types of lobbying frameworks in the literature, the study extends its scope of research to multi-principal and multi-agency based international interest group politics and its hybrid case in order to bring the interaction of the relevant interest politics to the fore. Within a specific factor model of international trade between 2 small open economies, we compare the political equilibrium environmental standards in different institutional frameworks which can be feasible in the sense of recently growing role of environmental interest group. Although the conventional finding suggests that cooperative bargaining between the two countries can attain the globally optimal level of the standard, the paper rather explains that the cooperation between the national interest groups and the hybrid case also generate the stricter standard then national interest politics usually do.

Abstract

This study presents the political economics models to explore the political landscape of special interest groups influencing the government's decision making process for implementing international environmental standard. Starting with the popular menu-auction types of lobbying frameworks in the literature, the study extends its scope of research to multi-principal and multi-agency based international interest group politics and its hybrid case in order to bring the interaction of the relevant interest politics to the fore. Within a specific factor model of international trade between 2 small open economies, we compare the political equilibrium environmental standards in different institutional frameworks which can be feasible in the sense of recently growing role of environmental interest group. Although the conventional finding suggests that cooperative bargaining between the two countries can attain the globally optimal level of the standard, the paper rather explains that the cooperation between the national interest groups and the hybrid case also generate the stricter standard then national interest politics usually do.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Aidt, T, "Political Internalisation of Economic Externalities and Environmental Policy", 69, pp.1~16 (1998)
  2. Anriquez, G, "Trade and the Environment: an economic literature survey" (2002)
  3. Bernheim, "and Economic Influence” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101", pp.1~31
  4. Bommer, R, "Environmental Regulation of Production Processes in the European Union: a political economy approach", 51, pp.559~582 (1996)
  5. Bommer, R, "Environmental Improvement with Trade Liberalization", 15, pp.639~661 (1999)
  6. Conconi, P, "Green Lobbies and Transboundary Pollution in Large Open Economies", 59(2), pp.399~422 (2003)
  7. Copeland, "B. and M.S. Taylor. 1994. “North-South Trade and the Environment” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 109", pp.755~787
  8. Copeland, B, "Trade and Transboundary Pollution", 85(4), pp.716~737 (1995)
  9. Copeland, B, "A Simple Model of Trade, Capital Mobility, and the Environment", (5898) (1997)
  10. Copeland, B, "Trade and the Environment" (2003), Princeton University Press
  11. Damania, R, "When the Weak Win: the Role of Investment in Environmental Lobbying", 42(1), pp.1~22 (2001)
  12. Dixit, A, "Common Agency and Coordination: General Theory and Application to Government Policy Making", 105, pp.752~769 (1997)
  13. Fredriksson, P.G, "The Political Economy of Trade Liberalization and Environmental Policy", 65, pp.513~525 (1999)
  14. Fredriksson, P.G, "The Political Economy of Pollution Taxes in a Small Open Economy", 33, pp.44~58 (1997)
  15. Grossman, G.M, "Trade Wars and Trade Talks", 103(4), pp.675~850 (1995)
  16. Hillman, "A.L. and H. Ursprung. 1992. “The Influence of Environmental Concerns on the Political Determination of Trade Policy” In Anderson The Greening of World Trade Issues. Ann Abor University of Michigan Press."
  17. Huang, C.J, "Mathematics and Mathematica for economists" (1997), Blackwell
  18. Neary, "J.P. 1978. “Short-run Capital Secificity and the Pure Theory of International Trade” Economic Journal 88", pp.488~510
  19. Persson, T, "Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy (Zeuthen Lectures)" (2002), MIT press.
  20. Prat, A, "Games Played through Agents", 71(4), pp.989~1026 (2003)
  21. Pugel, "T. 1982. “Endogenous Technological Change and International Technology Transfer in a Ricardian Trade Model” Journal of International Economics 13", pp.321~335
  22. Putnam, "the Logic of Two-level Games” International Organization 19", pp.211~240
  23. Schleich, J, "Environmental Quality with Endogenous Domestic and Trade Policies", 15, pp.53~71 (1999)
  24. Sturm, D, "Trade and the Environment: a survey of the literature" (2003)
  25. Yu, Z, "Environmental Protection and Free Trade: direct and indirect competition for political influence" (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)