공정거래법 판례 소개 (2016년 선고) - 불공정거래행위 및 기타 사건
Introduction and Comments on 2016 Precedents Focused on Competition law Issues
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis aims at introducing Supreme court’s precedents in 2016 which has some issues of competition law including subcontracting law except cartel. The main characteristic point of the precedents is to maintain the prior stance. Strict standard toward unfair support act and calculating standard in total amount of relating sales in rebate case is maintained. We can find precedent's attitude toward notice in FTC which denies the charater of regulation in Mass Mart Notice case. Also the precedent accept the damages from the point of rational causal relationship which is sued by credit card receipt retrieving service provider against 1st service demander VAN and 2nd service demander credit card company who were in charge of cartel. There were cases of important issue in legal translation. First is whether undertakings are able to make a sue against reduction dismissal in FTC. Verdicts in high court is separated. Supreme court accept the ability to sue the disposal considering the whole anti-trust legal system and real practice in FTC. Second is whether FTC's payments order in subcontracting law is illegal or not. This has something with constitutional issue related right to a trial. The precedent denied the possibility of FTC's order from the point of legal translation in choosing difficulty of the appropriate subcontract price while accepting the constitutionality.
Abstract
This thesis aims at introducing Supreme court’s precedents in 2016 which has some issues of competition law including subcontracting law except cartel. The main characteristic point of the precedents is to maintain the prior stance. Strict standard toward unfair support act and calculating standard in total amount of relating sales in rebate case is maintained. We can find precedent's attitude toward notice in FTC which denies the charater of regulation in Mass Mart Notice case. Also the precedent accept the damages from the point of rational causal relationship which is sued by credit card receipt retrieving service provider against 1st service demander VAN and 2nd service demander credit card company who were in charge of cartel. There were cases of important issue in legal translation. First is whether undertakings are able to make a sue against reduction dismissal in FTC. Verdicts in high court is separated. Supreme court accept the ability to sue the disposal considering the whole anti-trust legal system and real practice in FTC. Second is whether FTC's payments order in subcontracting law is illegal or not. This has something with constitutional issue related right to a trial. The precedent denied the possibility of FTC's order from the point of legal translation in choosing difficulty of the appropriate subcontract price while accepting the constitutionality.
참고문헌 (9)
- 이호영, "독점규제법(제5판)" (2015), 홍문사
- 김학태, "법률해석의 한계 -판례에서 나타난 법해석방법론에 대한 비판적 고찰-", 외법논집, (22), pp.177~206 (2006), 법학연구소
- 심헌섭, "합리적 법학방법론, 분석과 비판의 법철학", pp.214~ (2001), 법문사
- 이봉의, "독점규제법상 부당지원행위 - 법과 정책의 조화를 위한 시도-", 경쟁법연구, 27, pp.228~256 (2013), 한국경쟁법학회
- 이상주, "부당한 공동행위로 인한 손해액의 산정방법과 이른바 손해전가의 항변(Passing on Defence) 인정 여부", 대법원 판례해설, (93) (2012)
- 이 황, "하도급법의 최근 개정방향과 발전방향", 경쟁저널 (2014)
- 거래상 지위 남용 규제에서 거래질서와 적용 범위의 문제, "정재훈", 한국공정경쟁연합회, ~
- 주진열, "독점규제법상 거래상 지위남용 조항의 적용범위에 대한 비판적 고찰", 특별법연구, 13 (2016)
- 황태희, "하도급 거래에 있어서 수급사업자 보호의 실효성 제고방안에 관한 법적 연구 - 시정조치 등 제재를 중심으로 -", 경쟁법연구, 25, pp.278~310 (2012), 한국경쟁법학회
