본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

의자왕의 전략과 황산벌전투의 실상

The Strategy of King Uija and the Actuality of the Hwangsanbeol Battle

1

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

The Hwangsanbeol Battle was one of the decisive battles as well as the Gwansanseong(管山城) and Baekchongang River(白村江) Battles. However, it is unclear where the exact place was, why the Baekje chose it for the last battle field, how the Baekje could win the battle four times although they had only one tenths of soldiers against the Silla soldiers, and why the battle ended in the defeat of the Baekje, finally. Therefore, this study reenacted the Hwangsanbeol Battle from historic records and close considerations of the background. The best military strategy that King Uija(義慈王) of Baekje could establish was the prolonged war obstructing the Silla Dynasty and Tang(唐), China Combined Forces when the Baekje came under attack by the Combined Silla and Tang Forces in July, 660. The loyalists Seongchung(成忠) and Heungsu(興首) suggested that the enemy should not capture the Tanhyeon(炭峴) and Baekgang River(白江) to make this strategy a success. However, the Tang(唐) Forces already occupied the Baekgang River, and the Silla passed already the Tanhyeon while the Baekje was discussing and finding the best solution. This resulted that the Baekje should make a new strategy, so the Hwangsanbeol Battle was brought out. The Hwangsanbeol Field is estimated as the area around the Gaetaesa Temple(開泰寺) in Yeonsan(連山), Nonsan City(論山市), and this area was formed by tectonics valley including Hwangsan Mountain(黃山). The topographical feature of this area could make it possible for the Baekje to keep off the enemy although the Silla soldiers numbered ten times more than the Baekje's. This was the main reason why the General Gyebaek(階伯) of Baekje chose this area for the last battle field. Three units of the Silla Calvary Forces were supposed to attack the Three Military Camps(三營) of the Baekje infantry at one time, and then individual Camps, separately. Four times attacks of the Silla ended in failure. And the Silla infantry finally took the ultimate attack against the Baekje. The last battle resulted the final defeat of the Baekje despite the prior victories of four battles against the Silla.

Abstract

The Hwangsanbeol Battle was one of the decisive battles as well as the Gwansanseong(管山城) and Baekchongang River(白村江) Battles. However, it is unclear where the exact place was, why the Baekje chose it for the last battle field, how the Baekje could win the battle four times although they had only one tenths of soldiers against the Silla soldiers, and why the battle ended in the defeat of the Baekje, finally. Therefore, this study reenacted the Hwangsanbeol Battle from historic records and close considerations of the background. The best military strategy that King Uija(義慈王) of Baekje could establish was the prolonged war obstructing the Silla Dynasty and Tang(唐), China Combined Forces when the Baekje came under attack by the Combined Silla and Tang Forces in July, 660. The loyalists Seongchung(成忠) and Heungsu(興首) suggested that the enemy should not capture the Tanhyeon(炭峴) and Baekgang River(白江) to make this strategy a success. However, the Tang(唐) Forces already occupied the Baekgang River, and the Silla passed already the Tanhyeon while the Baekje was discussing and finding the best solution. This resulted that the Baekje should make a new strategy, so the Hwangsanbeol Battle was brought out. The Hwangsanbeol Field is estimated as the area around the Gaetaesa Temple(開泰寺) in Yeonsan(連山), Nonsan City(論山市), and this area was formed by tectonics valley including Hwangsan Mountain(黃山). The topographical feature of this area could make it possible for the Baekje to keep off the enemy although the Silla soldiers numbered ten times more than the Baekje's. This was the main reason why the General Gyebaek(階伯) of Baekje chose this area for the last battle field. Three units of the Silla Calvary Forces were supposed to attack the Three Military Camps(三營) of the Baekje infantry at one time, and then individual Camps, separately. Four times attacks of the Silla ended in failure. And the Silla infantry finally took the ultimate attack against the Baekje. The last battle resulted the final defeat of the Baekje despite the prior victories of four battles against the Silla.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 충남대 백제연구소, "百濟 黃山벌戰蹟地" (2000), 충남대 백제연구소
  2. 노중국, "백제 부흥운동사" (2003), 일조각
  3. "三國史記", ~
  4. 沈正輔, "白江의 위치에 대하여. in: 百濟史의 理解" (1991), 학연문화사
  5. 심정보, "長巖鎭城의 역사적 배경. in: 舒川 長巖鎭城", pp.22~23 (1997), 국립부여박물관
  6. 이영, "진포대첩의 현장은 어디인가. in: 서천지역 역사문화자원의 연구", pp.78~80 (2004), 공주대 백제문화연구소
  7. 김영관, "나당연합군의 백제 공격로와 금강. in: 백제와 금강" (2007), 백제사연구회
  8. 서정석, "사비도성의 방비체제와 금강. in: 백제와 금강", pp.120~ (2007), 서경문화사
  9. 이희진, "전쟁의 발견" (2004), 동아시아
  10. 김영관, "황산벌 출정에서 백강구전투까지. in: 백제실록 의자왕(부여군 백제신서 5)" (2008)
  11. 서영교, "羅唐戰爭期 唐兵法의 導入과 그 意義", 한국사연구, (116), pp.2~64 (2002), 한국사연구회
  12. 洪思俊, "炭峴考", 歷史學報, 35ㆍ36합 (1967), 역사학회
  13. 成周鐸, "百濟 炭峴 小考", 百濟論叢, 2 (1990), 백제문화개발연구원
  14. 梁起錫, "삼년산성의 역사성과 연구성과. in: 三年山城", pp.217~ (2001), 충북대 중원문화연구소
  15. 徐程錫, "炭峴에 대한 小考", 中原文化論叢, 7 (2003), 충북대 중원문화연구소
  16. 이판섭, "三國時代 山城과 古代 交通路에 대한 고찰", 호서고고학, (13집), pp.81~114 (2005), 호서고고학회
  17. 이판섭, "三國時代 山城의 監視半徑에 대하여", 호서고고학, (15집), pp.61~80 (2006), 호서고고학회
  18. 김기섭, "백제의 교역⋅교통로와 금강. in: 백제와 금강" (2007), 서경문화사
  19. 池內宏, "白江及び炭峴について", 滿鮮地理歷史報告, 14, pp.134~152 (1933)
  20. 李丙燾, "韓國史(古代篇)", pp.433~ (1959), 震檀學會
  21. 池憲英, "炭峴에 對하여", 語文硏究, 6, pp.87~118 (1970)
  22. 李基白, "韓國史講座 Ⅰ(古代篇)", pp.292~ (1982), 一潮閣
  23. 윤용혁, "936년 고려의 통일전쟁과 개태사", 韓國學報, 114 (2004)
  24. 서정석, "百濟 山城을 통해 본 황산벌전투의 현장", 역사교육, (91), pp.127~155 (2004), 역사교육연구회
  25. 임용한, "전쟁과 역사(삼국편)" (2001), 혜안
  26. "'日本書紀' 卷 19, 欽明紀 14年 10月條", ~
  27. 이문기, "泗沘時代 百濟의 軍事組織과 그 運用", 百濟硏究, 28, pp.283~ (1998), 충남대 백제연구소
  28. 金甲童, "高麗 太祖 王建과 後百濟 神劍의 戰鬪", 蒼海朴秉國敎授停年紀念論叢 (1997)
  29. 윤용혁, "충청역사문화연구", pp.271~278 (2004), 서경문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)