제3차～제7차 교육과정 고등학교 『국사』 교과서의 고대 국가 발달단계론에 대한 서술 검토
Investigating development stage theory of Korean ancient states in high school textbooks from the 3rd to the 7th educational process
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
If compared the Theory of the Development Stage of Ancient state from the 3rd to the 7th textbooks, only the term of each stage was changed and basically the logical structure is same because the development stage and period of each country is very similar to each other. The 3rd textbook was narrated from the viewpoint of the theory of Tribal state, argued Ancient State was developed according to priority of ‘Tribal State, Tribe Allied-bodies, Ancient State'. The 4th was narrated according to the theory of the development stage of ‘State, Ancient Kingdom' because the theory of Tribal state was criticized and the theory of Walled-town State and the theory of Chiefdom Society was asserted. The 5th was narrated Ancient State was formed through the stages of ‘Chiefdom State, Confederated Kingdom, Centralized State'. It was mixed the theory of Walled-town State and the theory of Chiefdom Society. Chiefdom State Confederated Kingdom were corresponded to Tribal State and Tribe Allied-bodies each other. The 6th was similar to the 5th, but was only narrated a term of State or Small State instead of Chiefdom State. Currently it was narrated Ancient State was formed through the stages of ‘State, Confederated Kingdom, Ancient state' in the 7th high school Korean History textbook current. It was narrated Ko-Joson was the first state, and several countries like Buyeo, Goguryeo, Okjeo, Dongye, Samhan were developed into the stage of Confederated Kingdom, and just Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla became Ancient state. But it have to narrated the first State is Ancient state, and Ancient Period was began after formed the first State. On the one hand, it have to narrated the former period of Ancient Period is not the prehistoric age but the primitive age.
Abstract
If compared the Theory of the Development Stage of Ancient state from the 3rd to the 7th textbooks, only the term of each stage was changed and basically the logical structure is same because the development stage and period of each country is very similar to each other. The 3rd textbook was narrated from the viewpoint of the theory of Tribal state, argued Ancient State was developed according to priority of ‘Tribal State, Tribe Allied-bodies, Ancient State'. The 4th was narrated according to the theory of the development stage of ‘State, Ancient Kingdom' because the theory of Tribal state was criticized and the theory of Walled-town State and the theory of Chiefdom Society was asserted. The 5th was narrated Ancient State was formed through the stages of ‘Chiefdom State, Confederated Kingdom, Centralized State'. It was mixed the theory of Walled-town State and the theory of Chiefdom Society. Chiefdom State Confederated Kingdom were corresponded to Tribal State and Tribe Allied-bodies each other. The 6th was similar to the 5th, but was only narrated a term of State or Small State instead of Chiefdom State. Currently it was narrated Ancient State was formed through the stages of ‘State, Confederated Kingdom, Ancient state' in the 7th high school Korean History textbook current. It was narrated Ko-Joson was the first state, and several countries like Buyeo, Goguryeo, Okjeo, Dongye, Samhan were developed into the stage of Confederated Kingdom, and just Goguryeo, Baekje, Silla became Ancient state. But it have to narrated the first State is Ancient state, and Ancient Period was began after formed the first State. On the one hand, it have to narrated the former period of Ancient Period is not the prehistoric age but the primitive age.
참고문헌 (36)
- 박찬흥, "고등학교 《국사》교과서에 보이는 단군과 고조선", 내일을 여는 역사, 31 (2008)
- 金光洙, "古朝鮮·辰國硏究의 動向과 ｢국사｣敎科書의 敍述", 歷史敎育, 45 (1989)
- 徐毅植, "古代·中世初 支配勢力硏究의 動向과 ｢국사｣敎科書의 敍述", 歷史敎育, 45 (1989)
- 琴京淑, "고등학교 ｢국사｣교과서 내용분석-고대사 부분을 중심으로", 江原史學, 8 (1992)
- 朴賢淑, "國史敎科書의 古代史 서술 방향", 歷史敎育, 69 (1999)
- 송호정, "제7차 교육과정 중·고등학교 국사교과서의 선사 및 국가 형성 관련 서술 검토", 韓國古代史硏究, 29 (2003)
- 김수태, "제7차 교육과정 중·고등학교 국사교과서의 고대 정치 관련 서술 검토", 韓國古代史硏究, 29 (2003)
- 全德在, "제7차 교육과정 중·고등학교 국사교과서의 고대 경제·사회 부분 분석", 韓國古代史硏究, 29 (2003)
- 金福順, "제7차 교육과정 중·고등학교 국사교과서의 고대 문화 관련 서술 검토", 韓國古代史硏究, 29 (2003)
- 이익주, "국사교과서의 정치사 서술 및 인식 검토 in: 한국사 교과서의 희망을 찾아서" (2003), 역사비평사
- 송규진, "고등학교 국사·경제사 부분의 서술체제와 서술 내용 분석 in: 한국사 교과서의 희망을 찾아서" (2003), 역사비평사
- 한상권, "고등학교 국사교과서의 역사인식 및 서술 내용 in: 한국사 교과서의 희망을 찾아서" (2003), 역사비평사
- 이남규, "고등학교 국사 교과서(7차) 고고학서술의 제문제", 역사문화논총, 2 (2006)
- 임기환, "고등학교 국사 교과서(7차) 삼국시대 정치사 서술의 검토", 역사문화논총, 2 (2006)
- 전덕재, "고등학교 국사교과서의 삼국 및 통일신라 정치사 서술의 특징과 변천 -제3차～제7차 국사교과서를 중심으로-", 역사교육논집, 43(43), pp.407~449 (2009), 역사교육학회
- 문교부, "인문계 고등학교 국사" (1974), 한국교과서주식회사
- 국사편찬위원회, "고등학교 국사" (1979), 대한교과서주식회사
- 박찬흥, "시대구분으로서의 선사와 고대, 그리고 국가", 내일을 여는 역사, 18, pp.298~299
- 盧泰敦, "國家의 成立과 發展 in: 韓國史硏究入門" (1981), 知識産業社
- 李鍾旭, "韓國의 初期國家 形成과 新羅의 政治的 成長 in: 제2판 한국사연구입문" (1987), 지식산업사
- 崔夢龍, "鐵器(初期鐵器·原三國)時代와 古代國家의 發生 in: 제2판 한국사연구입문" (1987), 지식산업사
- 朱甫暾, "韓國 古代國家形成에 대한 연구사적 검토 in: 한국 고대국가의 형성" (1990), 민음사
- 최광식, "남한학계의 고대국가 연구경향 in: 고대한국의 국가와 제사" (1994), 한길사
- 白南雲, "朝鮮社會經濟史" (1933), 改造社
- 金洸鎭, "高句麗社會の生産樣式-國家の形成過程を中心として-", 普專學會論集, 3, pp.28~ (1937)
- 金貞培, "韓國古代의 國家起源과 形成" (1986), 高麗大學校出版部
- 윤종영, "국사 교과서 파동", pp.171~173 (1999), 혜안
- 문교부, "고등학교 국사과 교육 과정 해설", 146~147 (1989)
- 李基白, "高句麗의 國家形成 問題 in: 韓國古代의 國家와 社會", pp.89~90, 一潮閣
- 李基東, "韓國古代國家起源論의 現段階 in: 韓國上古史의 諸問題", pp.178~181 (1987), 韓國精神文化硏究院
- 李基東, "韓國 古代國家形成史 硏究의 現況과 課題", 汕耘史學, 3, pp.64~65 (1989)
- 金貞培, "韓民族의 起源과 國家形成의 諸問題", 國史館論叢, 1 (1999)
- 崔夢龍, "韓國古代國家形成에 관한 一考察-衛滿朝鮮의 例- in: 金哲埈博士回甲記念 史學論叢" (1983), 知識産業社
- 최광식, "상고사에 대한 바람직한 교육 방안", 단군학 연구, 5, pp.10~11 (2001)
- 박찬흥, "고등학교《국사》교과서에 보이는 단군과 고조선", 내일을 여는 역사, 31 (2008)
- 하일식, "고대사 연구의 주요 쟁점과 과제 in: 한국사 연구 50년", pp.98~100 (2005), 혜안