본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신종인플루엔자 A(H1N1) 관련 과학보도 프레임 비교 연구 - 조선일보와 경향신문을 중심으로 -

A Comparative Study on the Frame of the Science News about Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A(H1N1) - Focused on Chosun Ilbo and The Kyunghyang Shinmun -

권상희|김효경
대한의료커뮤니케이션학회 (Korean Academy on Communication in Healthcare)|2011.06|의료커뮤니케이션 (Health Communication, the Official Journal of Korean Academy on Communication in Healthcare)|제6권 제1호|pp. 37-53|DOI 10.15715/kjhcom.2011.6.1.37

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

정보원뉴스 프레임과학보도신종 플루science newsnew frameNovel Swine-Origin Influenza A(H1N1)news source
주제분류의학일반

초록

This study analyzes news reports from Chosun Ilbo and The Kyunghyang about novel swine-origin influenza A(H1N1). This study is designed with content analysis as the study method. One of the predominant results of this study was that Chosun Ilbo used more expert news sources than The Kyunghyang, and reported more exact science news because of that. Formal news frames had many episodic frames. Chosun Ilbo had more episodic frames than The Kyunghyang and The Kyunghyang had more thematic frames than Chosun Ilbo in the first stage. The Kyunghyang had more thematic frames and episodic frames than Chosun Ilbo in the middle stage and the intensive stage. Content news frames were public agenda-centered frames, disaster recognition frames, new flu generation causes frames and economic results frames in descending order. Content news frames had many public agenda-centered frames in all stages, had many economic results frames in the first stage and had new flu generation causes frames, public agenda-centered frames and disaster recognition frames in the middle stage. Chosun Ilbo had more new flu generation causes frames and economic results frames than The Kyunghyang and The Kyunghyang had more public agenda-centered frames and disaster recognition frames than Chosun Ilbo in the first stage. Chosun Ilbo had more economic results frames, public agenda-centered frames and disaster recognition frames than The Kyunghyang and The Kyunghyang had more new flu generation causes frames than Chosun Ilbo in the intensive stage. Chosun Ilbo and The Kyunghyang also differed in main formal news frames and content news frames according to timeing.

Abstract

This study analyzes news reports from Chosun Ilbo and The Kyunghyang about novel swine-origin influenza A(H1N1). This study is designed with content analysis as the study method. One of the predominant results of this study was that Chosun Ilbo used more expert news sources than The Kyunghyang, and reported more exact science news because of that. Formal news frames had many episodic frames. Chosun Ilbo had more episodic frames than The Kyunghyang and The Kyunghyang had more thematic frames than Chosun Ilbo in the first stage. The Kyunghyang had more thematic frames and episodic frames than Chosun Ilbo in the middle stage and the intensive stage. Content news frames were public agenda-centered frames, disaster recognition frames, new flu generation causes frames and economic results frames in descending order. Content news frames had many public agenda-centered frames in all stages, had many economic results frames in the first stage and had new flu generation causes frames, public agenda-centered frames and disaster recognition frames in the middle stage. Chosun Ilbo had more new flu generation causes frames and economic results frames than The Kyunghyang and The Kyunghyang had more public agenda-centered frames and disaster recognition frames than Chosun Ilbo in the first stage. Chosun Ilbo had more economic results frames, public agenda-centered frames and disaster recognition frames than The Kyunghyang and The Kyunghyang had more new flu generation causes frames than Chosun Ilbo in the intensive stage. Chosun Ilbo and The Kyunghyang also differed in main formal news frames and content news frames according to timeing.

참고문헌 (56)

  1. 권상희, "과학뉴스(Science News)연구 : 생명공학 뉴스의 장기적인 보도경향연구", 한국언론정보학보, 32, pp.9~50 (2006), 한국언론정보학회
  2. 김선남, "매매춘 관련 TV 뉴스의 프레임 분석", 한국방송학보, 16(2), pp.41~76 (2002), 한국방송학회
  3. "신문의 보도 프레임 형성과 뉴스 제작 과정에 대한 연구", 한국언론학보, 48(4), pp.351~381 (2004), 한국언론학회
  4. 김원용, "언론보도의 프레임 유형화 연구: 국내 원자력관련 신문보도를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 49(6), pp.166~196 (2005), 한국언론학회
  5. 김춘식, "의료보건 이슈에 일반인 익명취재원 활용 신중해야", 신문과 방송 2009, 12; 54~61, ~ (2009)
  6. 나미수, "핵폐기장 유치에 대한 텔레비전 뉴스 프레임 분석 - KBS, MBC의 전국 및 지역(전북지역) 뉴스를 중심으로", 한국언론정보학보, 26, pp.157~208 (2004), 한국언론정보학회
  7. 박경숙, "집단 갈등 이슈의 방송 뉴스 프레임 분석의약 분업 뉴스 프레임을 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 46(2), pp.11~340 (2002), 한국언론학회
  8. 양문석, "수용자스키마가 미디어프레임 평가에 미치 는 영향 연구", 박사, pp.2001
  9. 양승찬, "대표적 정치커뮤니케이션 효과이론의 개요, in 현대 정치커뮤니케이 션 연구", pp.21~58 (2006), 나남출판
  10. 양정혜, "사회갈등의 의미 구성하기", 한국언론학보, 45(2), pp.284~315 (2001)
  11. 정대철, "과학보도의 정확성에 대한 조사, in 과학보도", pp.33~137 (1996), 한국언론연구원
  12. 정성식, "프레임 분석을 통해 본 언론의 의료보도 태 도 - 공중파 3사의 조류 독감 보도를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2004
  13. 신종 전염병 공포, "한국일보. 2003. 12. 30;19", 2003
  14. 차배근, "사회과학연구방법. 전정판" (1998), 세영사
  15. 최윤희, "우리나라 신문 과학보도의 정확성에 관한 분석" (1990), 과학기술처
  16. 우리나라 신문의 과학보도의 정확성에 대한 연구. 연구개발사업 성과의 효율적인 홍보방안 수 립에 관한 연구 보고서, "최윤희", 과학기술처, 112~125 (1990)
  17. 한동섭, "언론 보도에서 나타난 익명 정보원에 관한 연구 : ‘미국산 쇠고기 수입 논란’을 중심으로", 언론과학연구, 8(4), pp.702~739 (2008), 한국지역언론학회
  18. Chong D, "Creating common frames of reference on political issues, in Political Persuasion and Attitude Change" (1996), Univ. of Michigan Press
  19. Dunwood S, "Scientific barriers to the popularization of science in the mass media", Journal of Communication, 35, pp.26~42 (1985)
  20. Entman R, "Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm", Journal of Communication, 43(3) (1993)
  21. Entman R, "Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S", anti-nuclear movement, Political Communication, 10, pp.155~173 (1993)
  22. Gamson WA, "Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach", American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), pp.1~37 (1989)
  23. Gitlin T, "The Whole World Is Watching" (1980), University of California Press
  24. Goffman E, "Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience" (1974), Harvard Univ. Press
  25. Goodell R, "The Visible Scientists" (1977), Little, Brown & Co
  26. Gregory J, "두 얼굴의 과학: 과학은 대중과 어떻게 커뮤 니케이션하는가" (2001), 지호출판사
  27. Hansen A, "Science coverage in the British mass media: media output and source input", Communication, 17, pp.365~377 (1992)
  28. Iyengar S, "Is Anyone Responsible? How Television News Frames Political Issues" (1991), The University of Chicago Press
  29. Iyengar S, "News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of Agenda-setting, priming, and framing", Communication Research, pp.365~383 (1993)
  30. Kahneman D, "The psychology of preferences", Science, pp.136~246 (1982)
  31. Kahneman D, "Choices, values, and frames", American Psychologist, 39 (1984)
  32. 권복규, "전염병의 문화사" (2001), 사이언스북스
  33. Kepplinger M, "Instrumental actualization: a theory of mediated conflicts", European Journal of Communication, 6, pp.263~290 (1991)
  34. Krippendorff K, "Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology" (1980), Sage
  35. Kyvik S, "Popular science publishing", Scientometics, 31, pp.143~153 (1994)
  36. Lippmann W, "Public opinion" (1965), Free Press
  37. Peters HP, "The science-media interface: interactions of scientists and journalists, in Communication European Research 2005", pp.53~58 (2007), Springer
  38. Peters HP, "Scientists as public experts, in Handbook of public communication of science and technology", pp.136~139 (2008), Routledge
  39. Peters HP, "Öffentliche Kommunikation über klimawandel und Sturmflutrisiken. Bedeutungskonstruktion durch Experten, Journalisten und Bürger" (2005), Forshungszentrum
  40. Price V, "Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses", Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research (1995)
  41. Price V, "Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses", International Communication Association (1996)
  42. Price V, "Switching Trains of Thought: The Impact of News Frames on Readers' Cognitive Responses", Communication Research, 24(5), pp.481~506 (1997)
  43. Pulford DL, "Follow-up of study of science of news accuracy", Journalism Quarterly, 53(1), pp.119~121 (1976)
  44. Rothman S, "Journalists, broadcasters, scientific experts and public opinion", Minerva, 28, pp.117~133 (1990)
  45. Shepherd RG, "Selectivity of sources: reporting the marijuana controversy", journal of Communication, 31, pp.129~137 (1981)
  46. Snow D, "Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization", International Social Movement Research, 1, pp.19~217 (1988)
  47. Tankard JW, "News source perceptions of accuracy of science coverage", Journalism Quarterly, 51(2), pp.219~225 (1974)
  48. Tankard J, "Media Frames: Approaches to conceptualization and measurement", AEJMC (1991)
  49. Valkenburg PM, "The Effects of News Frame on Readers' Thoughts and Recall", Communication Research, 26(5), pp.500~569 (1999)
  50. Weber RP, "Basic Content Analysis" (1985), Sage
  51. Willems J, "The biologist as a source of information for the press. Bulletin of Science", Technology & society, 15, pp.21~46 (1995)
  52. Willis J, "위험보도: 저 널리즘과 과학적 사실의 충돌" (2006), 커뮤니케이 션북스
  53. [URL]
  55. "Accessed Nov 1, 2009", Accessed Nov 1, 2009, ~

관련 논문AI추천

감염병 발생 초기의 언론보도 연구: 사스, 신종플루, 에볼라바이러스병, 메르스,코로나19를 중심으로박경숙, 진명지한국헬스커뮤니케이션학회 · 헬스커뮤니케이션연구2022 · 제21권 제1호국내 신문의 가축 전염병 위험 보도에 대한 프레임 연구 : 중앙지와 지역지의 구제역 보도를 중심으로이민규, 이예리한국지역언론학회 · 언론과학연구2012 · 제12권 제2호위험사회의 의미 구성하기 －국내 언론의 신종플루 프레이밍 방식 분석양정혜한국정치커뮤니케이션학회 · 정치커뮤니케이션연구2010 · 제17호일간지 과학지면의 특성과 보도 경향 비교 연구:1994년과 2004년의 조선, 중앙, 동아일보를 중심으로이화행한국지역언론학회 · 언론과학연구2007 · 제7권 제1호위험보도(Risk News)에 대한 프레임 분석 -일본 원전 사태관련 방사능 유출에 대한 미디어 프레임 분석권상희, 김수진, 안성명, 장원정대한의료커뮤니케이션학회 · 의료커뮤니케이션2011 · 제6권 제2호한국 신문의 정치적 성향에 따른 기후변화 뉴스 프레이밍 차이 연구주영기한국지역언론학회 · 언론과학연구2013 · 제13권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

의료커뮤니케이션에서 음악치료이지민, 안지현pp. 1-6Modified Delphi 법을 이용한 의료 커뮤니케이션 교재 범위 설정박일환, 신좌섭, 노혜린, 임인석, 김대현, 박훈기, 이건호, 성낙진pp. 7-12병원 내 의사 간호사간 의사소통 관계임지향, 김현진, 김대현pp. 13-22위내시경 과정에 대해서 서면과 구두설명을 함께 받은 군과 구두설명만 받은 군 사이 불안감과 이해도 비교이수영, 최우영, 오윤미, 함상근, 박진아, 김형남pp. 23-29The trust on health information from the media in patients with diabetes안지현, 이민규pp. 30-36
원문 보기