위험보도(Risk News)에 대한 프레임 분석 -일본 원전 사태관련 방사능 유출에 대한 미디어 프레임 분석
A Study of Frame Analysis about Risk Reporting: Focused on News Frame Analysis of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Risk Reporting
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores Korean newspapers’ (Chosun Ilbo, The Hankyoreh, The Science) frame analysis for Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear risk reporting. The research is frame analysis from March 11 to April 22, 2011, total news coverages were 2012, and samples were 210. The news frame types are five frame factors including conflict frame, responsibility frame, human concerning frame, moral frame, economic important frame. The result showed that there are 43.8% are reporting and prospecting (21.9%), ethic and moral (7.1%),and economic related (6.7%). In addition, there are accident causal related news coverage is 5.7%, public opinion is 4.3% and political implication is 3.3%. The overall reporting are neutral tone (46.7%), negative tone is 41.4%, and positive coverage is 11.9%. On the other hand, Chosun Ilbo has 50.8% news are 41.4% whereas The Hankyoreh has 38.1%, and the Science has 22.% as negative frame. The overall frame types are conflict frame coverage (31.0%), responsibility frame (20.5%), human interest frame (16.7%), economic important (13.3%), and moral frame (4.3%). Moreover, the episodic frame portions are more than thematic frame coverages.
Abstract
This paper explores Korean newspapers’ (Chosun Ilbo, The Hankyoreh, The Science) frame analysis for Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear risk reporting. The research is frame analysis from March 11 to April 22, 2011, total news coverages were 2012, and samples were 210. The news frame types are five frame factors including conflict frame, responsibility frame, human concerning frame, moral frame, economic important frame. The result showed that there are 43.8% are reporting and prospecting (21.9%), ethic and moral (7.1%),and economic related (6.7%). In addition, there are accident causal related news coverage is 5.7%, public opinion is 4.3% and political implication is 3.3%. The overall reporting are neutral tone (46.7%), negative tone is 41.4%, and positive coverage is 11.9%. On the other hand, Chosun Ilbo has 50.8% news are 41.4% whereas The Hankyoreh has 38.1%, and the Science has 22.% as negative frame. The overall frame types are conflict frame coverage (31.0%), responsibility frame (20.5%), human interest frame (16.7%), economic important (13.3%), and moral frame (4.3%). Moreover, the episodic frame portions are more than thematic frame coverages.
참고문헌 (31)
- 강진숙, "삼풍백화점 붕괴사고'에 관한 TV뉴스보도를 중심으로", 언론 연구, 5(1), pp.117~146 (1996)
- 권상희, "인터넷 뉴스프레임 - 인터넷 미디어발달의 장기적인 뉴스보도 경향 연구", 한국언론정보학보, 30, pp.35~88 (2005), 한국언론정보학회
- 김용호, "한·미관계에 대한 미디어보도 분석:조선일보, MBC, New York Times 보도에 대한 프레임 분석을 중심으로", 한국과 국제정치, 20(4), pp.67~106 (2004), 극동문제연구소
- 김원용, "언론보도의 프레임 유형화 연구: 국내 원자력관련 신문보도를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 49(6), pp.166~196 (2005), 한국언론학회
- 김춘식, "참여정부의 언론정책에 관한 뉴스 프레임 연구 : ‘취재지원시스템 선진화방안’ 보도 분석을 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 52(2), pp.303~327 (2008), 한국언론학회
- 나미수, "핵폐기장 유치에 대한 텔레비전 뉴스 프레임 분석 - KBS, MBC의 전국 및 지역(전북지역) 뉴스를 중심으로", 한국언론정보학보, 26, pp.157~208 (2004), 한국언론정보학회
- 박경숙, "집단 갈등 이슈의 방송 뉴스 프레임 분석의약 분업 뉴스 프레임을 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 46(2), pp.11~340 (2002), 한국언론학회
- 박성희, "위험보도의 위기구축 기제 프레임 분석: 식품안전 보도를 중심으로", 한국언론정보학보, 35, pp.181~210 (2006), 한국언론정보학회
- 송용회, "미디어, 프레임, 현실구성: 미디어 프레임 연 구의 과제와 발전방향 모색을 위한 소고", 프로그 램텍스트, 13, pp.125~157 (2005)
- 심훈, "＂쓰나미＂에 대한 한미 양국 간의 이야기 구조 서사 분석: MBC의 <시사매거진 2580>과 CBS의 60Minutes를 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 49(6), pp.286~313 (2005), 한국언론학회
- 양정혜, "사회갈등의 의미 구성하기: 의료분쟁 보도 의 프레임 분석", 국언론학, 45(2), pp.284~315 (2001)
- 이건혁, "미디어 프레임이 부정 감정, 정치 냉소, 그리고 정치 효능성에 미치는 영향대학생 집단을 대상으로", 한국언론학보, 46(3), pp.8~288 (2002), 한국언론학회
- 이준웅, "언론의 틀 짓기 기능과 여론의 변화", 언론과 사회, 17, pp.100~135 (1997)
- 이준웅, "갈등적 이슈에 대한 뉴스 프레임 구성방식이 의견형성에 미치는 영향 : 내러티브 해석모형의 경험적 검증을 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 46(1), pp.441~482 (2002), 한국언론학회
- Calman KC, "The William Pickles lecture-issues of risk: ‘this unique opportunity’", British Journal of General Practice, 51, pp.47~51 (2001)
- Entman M, "Coverage of international news: contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents", Journal of Communication, 41(4), pp.6~27 (1991)
- Fombrun CJ, "Reputation" (1996), Harvard Business School
- Gamson A, "Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach", American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), pp.1~37 (1989)
- Goffmann E, "Frame analysis" (1974), University of Pennsylvania Press
- Hallahan K, "Seven Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations", Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(3), pp.205~242 (1999)
- Iyengar S, "How citizens think about national issues: a matter of responsibility", American Journal of Political Science, 33(4), pp.878~900 (1989)
- Jamieson KH, "News frame, political cynicism, and media cynicism", The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 546, pp.71~85 (1997)
- McClure J, "Countering fatalism: Causal information in news reports affects judgments about earthquake damage", Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23(2), pp.109~121 (2001)
- Neuman WR, "Common Knowledge" (1992), University of Chicago Press
- Pearson R, "Reframing crisis management", Academy of Management Revie, 23(1), pp.59~76 (1998)
- Price V, "News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing, in Progress in the Communication Science", Journal of Communication (1997)
- Price V, "Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive response", Communication Research, 24(5), pp.481~506 (1997)
- Rhee JW, "Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: a social cognitive account of framing effects", Journal of Communication, 47(3), pp.26~48 (1997)
- Scheufele A, "Framing as a theory of media effects", Journal of Communication, 49(1), pp.103~ (1999)
- Semetko HA, "Valkenburg PM. Framing Europeanpolitics: A content analysis of press and television news", Journal of Communication, 50(2), pp.93~ (2000)
- Valkenburg PM, "The effects of news frames on readers’ thoughts and recall", Communication Research, 26, pp.500~569 (1999)