Development of Korean Version of Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit-Quick Version
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop the Korean version of profile of hearing aid benefit-quick version (K-PHAB-Q) which shortens 20 questions of K-PHAB into 10 for efficient evaluation of hearing aids benefit. Methods: First, responses for the questionnaires were collected from 140 hearing aid users (average age: 67.39). K-PHAB-Q consists of ease of communication (EC), background noise (BN), reverberation (RV), aversiveness of sounds (AV) and localization (LC), and was verified through factor analysis, principal component analysis, and Cronbach’s alpha analysis for a total of 10 selected items. Second, the K-PHAB-Q questionnaire was collected by test-retesting for a total of 40 hearing aid users (average age: 71.98). The collected questionnaires were verified by paired t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient, and the 95% prediction interval (PI) was calculated to establish the standard of change in subjective satisfaction on hearing aid users. Results: The results of this study were 1) according to Cronbach’s alpha analysis of K-PHAB-Q, the internal consistency of all items was high as 0.854, 2) test-retest result of K-PHAB-Q showed no significant difference (r > 0.05) and showed high correlation in all items, 3) The 95% PI of EC, BN, RV, AV, and LC showed ± 16.823, ± 17.734, ± 12.123, ± 14.404, and ± 8.193 respectively. Conclusion: K-PHAB-Q, will be useful for hearing aid verification or validation at hearing aid fitting management sites in a short time.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop the Korean version of profile of hearing aid benefit-quick version (K-PHAB-Q) which shortens 20 questions of K-PHAB into 10 for efficient evaluation of hearing aids benefit. Methods: First, responses for the questionnaires were collected from 140 hearing aid users (average age: 67.39). K-PHAB-Q consists of ease of communication (EC), background noise (BN), reverberation (RV), aversiveness of sounds (AV) and localization (LC), and was verified through factor analysis, principal component analysis, and Cronbach’s alpha analysis for a total of 10 selected items. Second, the K-PHAB-Q questionnaire was collected by test-retesting for a total of 40 hearing aid users (average age: 71.98). The collected questionnaires were verified by paired t-test and Pearson correlation coefficient, and the 95% prediction interval (PI) was calculated to establish the standard of change in subjective satisfaction on hearing aid users. Results: The results of this study were 1) according to Cronbach’s alpha analysis of K-PHAB-Q, the internal consistency of all items was high as 0.854, 2) test-retest result of K-PHAB-Q showed no significant difference (r > 0.05) and showed high correlation in all items, 3) The 95% PI of EC, BN, RV, AV, and LC showed ± 16.823, ± 17.734, ± 12.123, ± 14.404, and ± 8.193 respectively. Conclusion: K-PHAB-Q, will be useful for hearing aid verification or validation at hearing aid fitting management sites in a short time.
참고문헌 (16)
- 추호석, "한국어판 International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids(IOI-HA)의 표준화: 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 55(1), pp.20~25 (2012), 대한이비인후과학회
- Cox, R. M., "The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit", Ear and Hearing, 16(2), pp.176~186 (1995)
- Cox, R. M., "Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life : The SADL scale", Ear and Hearing, 20(4), pp.306~320 (1999)
- Cox, R. M., "The international outcome inventory for hearing aids(IOI-HA) : Psychometric properties of the English version : El inventario international de resultados para auxiliares auditivos(IOI-HA) : Propiedades psicometricas de la version en ingles", International Journal of Audiology, 41(1), pp.30~35 (2002)
- Cox, R. M., "Development of the profile of hearing aid performance(PHAP)", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33(2), pp.343~357 (1990)
- Cox, R. M., "Predictability and reliability of hearing aid benefit measured using the PHAB", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 3(4), pp.242~254 (1992)
- Davis, A., "Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55-74-year-old first-time hearing aid users", International Journal of Audiology, 42(Supplement 2), pp.39~52 (2003)
- D’Haenens, W., "Auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing adults : A test-retest reliability study", International Journal of Audiology, 47(8), pp.489~498 (2008)
- Dillon, H., "Client oriented scale of improvement(COSI)and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 8(1), pp.27~43 (1997)
- George, D., "SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference" (2003), Allyn & Bacon
- 한우재, "난청 성인 및 노인용 설문지에 대한 문헌 분석", Audiology and Speech Research, 11(1), pp.3~16 (2015), 한국청각언어재활학회
- 조병해, "Attitudes toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire (ALHQ)를 이용한 난청인의 심리적 평가의 타당성 연구", Audiology and Speech Research, 7(1), pp.19~27 (2011), 한국청각언어재활학회
- 김건구, "보청기 착용 만족도를 측정하는 설문지의 특성 분석 연구: Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life, Client Oriented Scale of Improvement, International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids", Audiology and Speech Research, 14(3), pp.158~175 (2018), 한국청각언어재활학회
- 김태화, "한국어판 보청기이득평가 설문지 개발", Audiology and Speech Research, 12(4), pp.209~220 (2016), 한국청각언어재활학회
- Kochkin, S., "MarkeTrak VIII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing aids is slowly increasing", The Hearing Journal, 63(1), pp.19~32 (2010)
- Ku, H., "Test-retest reliability of the Korean hearing handicap inventory for the elderly(KHHIE)", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 5(1), pp.1~22 (2000)