본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of Equivalence and Reliability of Korean Translated Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefits

김진숙|김태화
한국청각언어재활학회 (Korean Academy of Audiology)|2020.07|Audiology and Speech Research|제16권 제3호|pp. 175-187

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

QuestionnaireReliabilityEquivalenceAPHAB·등가성·설문지·신뢰도·번역본.Abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefitsTranslation.

초록

For using the translated questionnaires, an appropriate translation should be accomplished for establishing the equivalence. The equivalence is divided into two categories, formal equivalence regarding words and grammar and dynamic equivalence meaning the naturalness of the context with the consideration of the cultural and emotional characteristics of the region. The purpose of this study was to verify formal and dynamic equivalences and statistical reliability of the widely used translated questionnaire in Korea, abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefits (APHAB). The identification of equivalence was conducted in formal and dynamic categories and the statistical verification was performed for 6 translated APHAB which are currently utilized in Korea. None of 6 translated APHAB had formal and dynamic equivalences for all 24 items when the score ‘2’ was given to the completed equivalence of each item. Two translated APHAB showed ‘11’ as the best score and one of them showed ‘0’ for the formal equivalence identification. For the dynamic equivalence, the two translated APHAB scored ‘20’ as the best score. The one scored ‘0’ for the formal equivalence showed ‘0’ also in the dynamic equivalence. And only two translated APHAB presented the statistical validation using Cronbach’s alpha and factor analysis. It was confirmed that any of 6 translated APHAB in Korea could not reproduce the original contents with the appropriate equivalence and statistical validation. As the translated version was found to have a limitation in delivering the original contents due to language, emotional and cultural differences, a Korean questionnaire should be developed.

Abstract

For using the translated questionnaires, an appropriate translation should be accomplished for establishing the equivalence. The equivalence is divided into two categories, formal equivalence regarding words and grammar and dynamic equivalence meaning the naturalness of the context with the consideration of the cultural and emotional characteristics of the region. The purpose of this study was to verify formal and dynamic equivalences and statistical reliability of the widely used translated questionnaire in Korea, abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefits (APHAB). The identification of equivalence was conducted in formal and dynamic categories and the statistical verification was performed for 6 translated APHAB which are currently utilized in Korea. None of 6 translated APHAB had formal and dynamic equivalences for all 24 items when the score ‘2’ was given to the completed equivalence of each item. Two translated APHAB showed ‘11’ as the best score and one of them showed ‘0’ for the formal equivalence identification. For the dynamic equivalence, the two translated APHAB scored ‘20’ as the best score. The one scored ‘0’ for the formal equivalence showed ‘0’ also in the dynamic equivalence. And only two translated APHAB presented the statistical validation using Cronbach’s alpha and factor analysis. It was confirmed that any of 6 translated APHAB in Korea could not reproduce the original contents with the appropriate equivalence and statistical validation. As the translated version was found to have a limitation in delivering the original contents due to language, emotional and cultural differences, a Korean questionnaire should be developed.

참고문헌 (49)

  1. Chapman, D. W., "Translation procedures for the cross cultural use of measurement instruments", Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1(3), pp.71~76 (1979)
  2. 추호석, "한국어판 International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids(IOI-HA)의 표준화: 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 55(1), pp.20~25 (2012), 대한이비인후과학회
  3. Cox, R. M., "Administration and application of the APHAB", The Hearing Journal, 50(4), pp.32~48 (1997)
  4. Cox, R. M., "The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit", Ear and Hearing, 16(2), pp.176~186 (1995)
  5. Cox, R. M., "Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life : The SADL scale", Ear and Hearing, 20(4), pp.306~320 (1999)
  6. Cox, R. M., "The international outcome inventory for hearing aids(IOI-HA) : Psychometric properties of the English version : El inventario international de resultados para auxiliares auditivos(IOI-HA) : Propiedades psicometricas de la version en ingles", International Journal of Audiology, 41(1), pp.30~35 (2002)
  7. Cox, R. M., "Development of the profile of hearing aid performance(PHAP)", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33(2), pp.343~357 (1990)
  8. Cox, R. M., "Comparison of two questionnaires for patient-assessed hearing aid benefit", Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2(3), pp.134~145 (1991)
  9. Gatehouse, S., "The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale(SSQ)", International Journal of Audiology, 43(2), pp.85~99 (2004)
  10. George, D., "SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference" (2003), Allyn and Bacon
  11. Guilford, J. P., "Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education" (1978), Mcgraw-Hill
  12. 한우재, "난청 성인 및 노인용 설문지에 대한 문헌 분석", Audiology and Speech Research, 11(1), pp.3~16 (2015), 한국청각언어재활학회
  13. 허지혜, "인공와우와 보청기 양이착용이 K-HINT 수행도에 미치는 혜택", Audiology and Speech Research, 5(1), pp.60~70 (2009), 한국청각언어재활학회
  14. Hur, G., "The influence of the levels of abstraction in survey questionnaires on college students’ television uses and gratifications", Korean Society for Journalism and Communication Studies, 43(2), pp.386~428 (1998)
  15. Jakobson, R., "On linguistic aspects of translation" (1959), Harvard University Press
  16. 장봉기, "외국 검사도구의 번역 및 타당화 과정에 대한 비판적 검토 —국어과 정의적 영역의 검사도구를 중심으로", 국어교육학연구, 49(1), pp.557~584 (2014), 국어교육학회[DOI]
  17. 전지영, "한국 중학생의 과학영역 성취정서 질문지(AEQ-KMS) 개발과 타당화", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(8), pp.745~754 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  18. Jeong, O., "A study on equivalence in English-Korean translation", Master, pp.2009
  19. 조병해, "Attitudes toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire (ALHQ)를 이용한 난청인의 심리적 평가의 타당성 연구", Audiology and Speech Research, 7(1), pp.19~27 (2011), 한국청각언어재활학회
  20. 강현철, "구성타당도 평가에 있어서 요인분석의 활용", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), pp.587~594 (2013), 한국간호과학회
  21. 김봉직, "한국어판 The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale의 표준화: 타당도 및 신뢰도 연구", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 60(6), pp.279~294 (2017), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  22. 김건구, "보청기 착용 만족도를 측정하는 설문지의 특성 분석 연구: Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life, Client Oriented Scale of Improvement, International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids", Audiology and Speech Research, 14(3), pp.158~175 (2018), 한국청각언어재활학회
  23. 김향희, "실어증 선별검사 개발을 위한 내용타당도 검증", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 13(3), pp.353~380 (2008), 한국언어청각임상학회
  24. 김지희, "환경음을 이용한 청능훈련이 난청 노인의 단어 및 문장인지에 미치는 효과", Audiology and Speech Research, 13(2), pp.115~122 (2017), 한국청각언어재활학회
  25. Kim, K., "Likert Scale", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 32(1), pp.1~2 (2011)
  26. 김태화, "한국어판 보청기이득평가 설문지 개발", Audiology and Speech Research, 12(4), pp.209~220 (2016), 한국청각언어재활학회
  27. Kim, Y. T., "Content and reliability analyses of the preschool receptive-expressive language scale(PRES)", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 5(1), pp.1~25 (2000)
  28. 김영태, "영유아 언어발달검사(SELSI) 개발 연구: 문항 및 신뢰도 분석", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 7(2), pp.1~23 (2002), 한국언어청각임상학회
  29. 고재춘, "영한번역에서 등가성 구현에 대한 연구", 석사, 영어영문학, pp.2006
  30. Kolotkin, R. L., "Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity", Obesity Research, 9(2), pp.102~111 (2001)
  31. Kolotkin, R. L., "Construct validity of the impact of weight on quality of life questionnaire", Obesity Research, 5(5), pp.434~441 (1997)
  32. Ku, H., "Test-retest reliability of the Korean hearing handicap inventory for the elderly(KHHIE)", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 5(1), pp.1~22 (2000)
  33. 이인영, "보청기 착용 환자에서 Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life설문지를 이용하여 평가한 만족도 조사", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 47(12), pp.1217~1223 (2004), 대한이비인후과학회
  34. Lee, K., "Patterns and constrains of equivalence in translation", Master, pp.2004
  35. 이경희, "한국의 도구개발 간호연구에서의 타당도에 대한 고찰", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(6), pp.697~703 (2013), 한국간호과학회
  36. Lee, S., "A study on equivalence in English-Korean translation", Master, pp.2015
  37. 임현정, "한국어판 Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit의 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 60(4), pp.164~173 (2017), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  38. Nida, E. A., "Toward a Science of Translation" (1964), Brill
  39. 오현아, "한국어와 영어의 발상에 대한 비교 인지언어학적 고찰 -청자 중심 원리와 화자 중심 원리를 중심으로-", 국어교육연구, (28), pp.1~29 (2011), 국어교육연구소[DOI]
  40. Park, H. S., "Development of Korean version of obesity-related quality of life scale", Journal of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome, 12(4), pp.280~292 (2003)
  41. 박시내, "한국어판 고령자 청력 장애 검사(K-HHIE) 설문지의 표준화: 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증", 대한이비인후-두경부외과학회지, 54(12), pp.828~834 (2011), 대한이비인후과학회
  42. Pekrun, R., "Measuring emotion in student’s learning and performance : The achievement emotions questionnaire(AEQ)", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), pp.36~48 (2011)
  43. Saunders, G. H., "Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the attitudes toward loss of hearing questionnaire", Ear and Hearing, 17(6), pp.505~519 (1996)
  44. Seong, T. J., "Validity and Reliability" (2002), Hakjisa Publisher
  45. Shabana, M., "Comparison of two hearing aid fitting formulae in improving the patients’ satisfaction with amplification for experienced hearing aid users", Advanced Arab Academy of Audiovestibulogy Journal, 4(1), pp.19~25 (2017)
  46. "The Case Analysis of Non-Sampling Error Induced by Characteristics of Survey Questions of a Questionnaire" (2007)[URL]
  47. Ventry, I. M., "The hearing handicap inventory for the elderly : A new tool", Ear and Hearing, 3(3), pp.128~134 (1982)
  48. 여성희, "보청기 착용자를 대상으로 문장을 이용한 소음 하 청능훈련의 효과에 관한 연구", Audiology and Speech Research, 10(1), pp.65~75 (2014), 한국청각언어재활학회
  49. Yun, D. H., "Subjective satisfaction in hearing aid users by APHAB", Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 43(7), pp.698~702 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

한국어판 Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit의 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증김봉직, 박무균, 안용휘, 임현정, 조양선, 최병윤, 최진웅, 한규철대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2017 · 제60권 제4호한국어판 보청기이득평가 설문지 개발김태화, 심송용, 이경원한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2016 · 제12권 제4호한국어판 International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids(IOI-HA)의 표준화: 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증박시내, 변재용, 신정은, 이준호, 정재윤, 조양선, 천병철, 추호석, 한규철대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2012 · 제55권 제1호Development of Korean Version of Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit-Quick Version김대영, 이경원한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2020 · 제16권 제3호한국어판 고령자 청력 장애 검사(K-HHIE) 설문지의 표준화: 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증박시내, 변재용, 신정은, 정종우, 조양선, 채성원, 천병철, 최재영, 추호석, 한규철대한이비인후과학회 · 대한이비인후과학회지 두경부외과학2011 · 제54권 제12호보청기 착용 만족도를 측정하는 설문지의 특성 분석 연구: Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life, Client Oriented Scale of Improvement, International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids김건구, 김도균, 김진숙, 이은성한국청각언어재활학회 · Audiology and Speech Research2018 · 제14권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Effect of Background Music for Attentive Concentration in Working박시훈, 한우재, 곽찬범pp. 188-195Development of Korean Version of Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit-Quick Version김대영, 이경원pp. 196-205Efficacy of Auditory Training Using Video Clips for Older Adults Who Wear Hearing Aids방정화, 이민준pp. 206-216Effects of Contextual Predictability Clues in Speech Materials on the Korean Speech Intelligibility Index오홍엽, 진인기, 최순제pp. 217-225Analysis for Error Patterns of Consonant-Vowel Combinations in Hearing-Impaired Elderly박시훈, 한우재pp. 226-235
원문 보기