Institutional Leadership and Perceived Performance: Evidence from the Korean Minister Survey
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Few empirical studies have explored Selznick’s ideas on institutional leadership’s role in creating, nourishing, and maintaining public institutions. Reconsidering and expanding Selznick’s perspective, this study explores how perceived ministerial performance is associated with institutional leadership styles. Using data from the 2007 Korean Minister Survey, this study develops five types of institutional leadership (visionary, persuasive, resilient, coalition network, and maintaining) derived from an exploratory factor analysis and tests their association with ministers’ performance. It suggests that visionary leadership and persuasive leadership are the primary determinants of Korean ministers’ performance, and their effects are greater for ministers without presidential support. Resilient leadership and coalition network leadership are also significantly associated with ministers’ performance, but maintaining leadership has little effect on it. Moderating effects on the relationship between leadership type and performance include presidential support and the presence of a performance crisis. Further research is needed to develop different measures for ministerial performance from different sources in order to avoid the common method bias.
Abstract
Few empirical studies have explored Selznick’s ideas on institutional leadership’s role in creating, nourishing, and maintaining public institutions. Reconsidering and expanding Selznick’s perspective, this study explores how perceived ministerial performance is associated with institutional leadership styles. Using data from the 2007 Korean Minister Survey, this study develops five types of institutional leadership (visionary, persuasive, resilient, coalition network, and maintaining) derived from an exploratory factor analysis and tests their association with ministers’ performance. It suggests that visionary leadership and persuasive leadership are the primary determinants of Korean ministers’ performance, and their effects are greater for ministers without presidential support. Resilient leadership and coalition network leadership are also significantly associated with ministers’ performance, but maintaining leadership has little effect on it. Moderating effects on the relationship between leadership type and performance include presidential support and the presence of a performance crisis. Further research is needed to develop different measures for ministerial performance from different sources in order to avoid the common method bias.
참고문헌 (50)
- Andeweg, R. B., "Ministers as double agents? The delegation process between cabinet and ministers", European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), pp.377~395 (2000)
- Avolio, B. J., "Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, pp.441~462 (1999)
- Barnard, C., "The Function of the Executive" (1938), Harvard University Press
- Bass, B. M., "Leadership and performance beyond expectations" (1985), Free Press
- Bass, B. M., "Handbook of leadership" (1990), Free Press
- Bass, B. M, "Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership" (1994), Sage Publications
- Boin, A., "The development of public institutions: Reconsidering the role of leadership", Administration and Society, 40(3), pp.271~298 (2008)
- Boin, A., "Public leadership in times of crisis: Mission impossible", Public Administration Review, 63(5), pp.544~553 (2003)
- Burns, J. M., "Leadership" (1978), Harper and Row
- Chabal, P. M., "Do ministers matter? The individual style of ministers in programmed policy change", International Review of Administrative Science, 69, pp.29~49 (2003)
- 장세진, "From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research", JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 41(2), pp.178~184 (2010), PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD
- Christensen, S., "Action in institutions", American Behavioral Scientist, 40, pp.389~538 (1997)
- Coutu, D. L., "How resilience works", Harvard Business Review, 80(5), pp.46~55 (2002)
- Denis, J. L., "The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations", Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), pp.809~837 (2001)
- Denis, J. L., "Rethinking leadership in public organizations, in The Oxford handbook of public management" (2005), Oxford University Press
- DiMaggio, P. J., "Interest and agency in institutional theory, in Institutional patterns and organizations", pp.3~21 (1988), Ballinger
- Doig, J. W., "Leadership and innovation" (1987), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Dumdum, U. R., "Meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension, in Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead", pp.35~65 (2002), JAI Press
- Egri, C. P., "Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizatio", Academy of Management Journal, 43, pp.571~604 (2000)
- Fligstein, N., "Social skill and institutional theory", American Behavioral Scientist, 40, pp.397~405 (1997)
- Getha-Taylor, H., "Focusing the Lens of Public Leadership: Research Propositions and Questions in the Minnowbrook Tradition", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, pp.i83~i97 (2011)
- Jarzabkowski, P., "Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change", Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), pp.23~56 (2003)
- Jung, K., "Exploring the Linkage Between Ministerial Leadership and Performance in Korea", ADMIN SOC, 40(7), pp.667~690 (2008), SAGE
- Kaufman, H., "The administrative behavior of federal bureau chiefs" (1981), Brookings Institution
- Kimberley, J. R., "Initiation, innovation, and institutionalization in the creation process, in The organizational life cycle: Issues in the creation, transformation, and decline of organizations", pp.18~43 (1980), Jossey-Bass
- King, A., "Ministerial autonomy in Britain, in Cabinet ministers and parliamentary government", pp.203~225 (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Lewis, E., "Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic political power" (1984), Indiana University Press
- Lowe, K. B., "Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature", The Leadership Quarterly, 7, pp.385~425 (1996)
- Mallak, L., "Putting organizational resilience to work", Industrial Management, 40(6), pp.8~13 (1998)
- Marsh, D., "Re-assessing the role of departmental cabinet ministers", Public Administration, 78(2), pp.305~326 (2000)
- Mintzberg, H., "Strategy formation in an adhocracy", Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), pp.580~589 (1985)
- Neustadt, R., "Presidential power: The politics of leadership" (1960), Wiley
- Nohria, N., "Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice" (2010), Harvard Business Press
- Nonet, P., "Law and society in transition: Towards responsive law" (1996), Octagon Books
- Nye, J. S., Jr., "The power to lead" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Pfeffer, J., "The ambiguity of leadership", Academy of Management Review, 2, pp.104~112 (1977)
- Pfeffer, J., "Hard facts, dangerous half-truths and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management" (2006), Harvard Business School Press
- Podolny, J. M., "Revisiting the Meaning of Leadership", Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, pp.1~36 (2005)
- Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp.879~903 (2003)
- Rao, "Power plays: How social movements and collective action create new organizational forms, in Research in organizational behavior", pp.237~282 (2000), JAI Press
- Rhodes, R. A. W., "Everyday life in a ministry: Public administration as anthropology", American Review of Public Administration, 35(1), pp.3~25 (2005)
- Riccucci, N. M., "Unsung heroes: Federal execucrats making a difference" (1995), Georgetown University Press
- Selznick, P., "T.V.A. and the grass roots" (1949), University of California Press
- Selznick, P., "Leadership in administration" (1957), Harper and Row
- Terry, L. D., "The leadership-management distinction: The domination and displacement of mechanistic and organismic theories", The Leadership Quarterly, 6(4), pp.515~527 (1995)
- Thornton, P. H., "Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958-1990", American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), pp.801~844 (1990)
- Trottier, T., "Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations", Public Administration Review, 68, pp.319~333 (2008)
- Washington, M., "Institutional leadership: Past, present, and future, in Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism", pp.721~735 (2008), Sage
- Wilson, J. Q., "Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it" (1989), Basic Books
- Wofford, J. C., "Follower motive patterns as situational moderators for transformational leadership effectiveness", Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, pp.196~211 (2001)
