‘식민지 아카데미즘’의 그늘, 지식인의 전향
The Shadow of Colonial Academism：Conversion of Korean Intellectuals
1
조회
0
다운로드
32
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean studies, which began in the early 1930s, marked a starting point for an independent academism that attempted to transcend the imitation of Japanese and Western academism, taking instead as its object of study Korean history and social. reality as its object of study. The development of Marxist analysis of Korean society, along with the interest in history and cultural tradition, was based on the unified understanding of national and class issues, which formed the ground of the worldwide trend of the Anti-Fascist People’s Front. The Korean-led colleges played a defined role as academic centers in colonial Korea. However, it is difficult to see them as stable institutions for academic reproduction. Korean graduates of Keijo Imperial University also exemplified the situation in which colonial intellectuals were put. To understand this situation in colonial Korea. in which academic activities were unstable and even the use of language was restricted, not as the lack of academism but as colonial academism is to highlight the imperial constraint of modern academism. After the breakout of the Sino-Japanese War, Japanese intellectuals began to participate in constructing the total war system with a hope of a “wartime transformation.” To the contrary, in order to turn to the total war system, Korean intellectuals were required to come up with a theory suitable to the national question. There existed limited sources of the logic of conversion available to the colonial intellectuals. The logic of conversion can largely be summarized as twofold：the control economy theory and the theory of the national harmony. These theories succeeded the “scientific Korean studies” in distorted ways, in the sense that they had strong concern about the national and class questions.
Abstract
Korean studies, which began in the early 1930s, marked a starting point for an independent academism that attempted to transcend the imitation of Japanese and Western academism, taking instead as its object of study Korean history and social. reality as its object of study. The development of Marxist analysis of Korean society, along with the interest in history and cultural tradition, was based on the unified understanding of national and class issues, which formed the ground of the worldwide trend of the Anti-Fascist People’s Front. The Korean-led colleges played a defined role as academic centers in colonial Korea. However, it is difficult to see them as stable institutions for academic reproduction. Korean graduates of Keijo Imperial University also exemplified the situation in which colonial intellectuals were put. To understand this situation in colonial Korea. in which academic activities were unstable and even the use of language was restricted, not as the lack of academism but as colonial academism is to highlight the imperial constraint of modern academism. After the breakout of the Sino-Japanese War, Japanese intellectuals began to participate in constructing the total war system with a hope of a “wartime transformation.” To the contrary, in order to turn to the total war system, Korean intellectuals were required to come up with a theory suitable to the national question. There existed limited sources of the logic of conversion available to the colonial intellectuals. The logic of conversion can largely be summarized as twofold：the control economy theory and the theory of the national harmony. These theories succeeded the “scientific Korean studies” in distorted ways, in the sense that they had strong concern about the national and class questions.
참고문헌 (59)
- "朝鮮總督府, 朝鮮總督府官報 1635"[URL]
- "朝鮮總督府及所屬官署職員錄 1929,1931,1933"[URL]
- "延禧專門學校經濟硏究會關係者檢擧ノ件 , in 延禧專門學校同志會興業俱樂部關係報告 한국역사정보통합시스템"[URL]
- "三宅城大敎授の赤化運動事件", 思想彙報, 2 (1935)
- 三宅鹿之助, "感想錄, In 三宅鹿之助敎授事件(국사편찬위원회 소장)" (1934)
- 白南雲, "感想錄, In 李順鐸外二名治安維持法違反 (국사편찬위원회 소장)" (1939)
- 李順鐸, "思想轉向錄, In 李順鐸外二名治安維持法違反 (국사편찬위원회 소장)" (1939)
- 盧東奎, "感想錄(マルクス理論克服日本精神體得記), In 李順鐸外二名治安維持法違反 (국사편찬위원회 소장)" (1939)
- 李康國, "自らを語る, In 方龍弼外四十三名治安維持法等違反 (국사편찬위원회 소장)" (1939)
- 崔容達, "感想錄(事件に關係するまで)", 思想彙報, 24 (1940)
- "編輯後記", 新興, 1 (1929)
- "新興", 新興, 2 (1929)
- "編輯餘錄", 新興, 5 (1931)
- "編輯後記", 新興, 7 (1932)
- 漢陽學人, "新進學者總評(一),延禧專門敎授層評", 三千里 (1930)
- 漢陽學人, "左傾敎授·右傾敎授,延禧專門敎授層評(續)", 三千里 (1931)
- "民間六專門과 聯合夏期巡廻大講座", 東亞日報, ~ (1935)
- "삼전문학교 사교수 삼신문사 학예부장 문예정책회의", 三千里 (1936)
- 朴致祐, "아카데믹 哲學을 나오며－哲學의 現實에 對한 責任分擔의 究明", 朝光 (1936)
- 白南雲, "學術基幹部隊의 養成－中央아카데미 창설", 東亞日報, ~ (1936)
- 李康國, "대학 합동문제와 문교정책, In 이강국연구,자료편：이강국 관련 자료" (2006), 백산서당
- 조선민주주의인민공화국 최고재판소, "미제국주의 고용간첩 박헌영 리승엽 도당의 조선민주주의인민공화국 정권 전복음모와 간첩사건 공판문헌", 이강국 연구
- 兪鎭午, "養虎記-普專·高大三十年의 回顧" (1977), 高麗大學校出版部
- 林和, "朝鮮文學의 新情勢와 現代的諸相, In 임화문학예술전집4 평론1" (2009), 소명출판
- 林和, "敎養과 朝鮮文壇, In 임화문학예술전집5평론2" (2009), 소명출판
- 임화, "조선 민족문학 건설의 기본과제에 관한 일반보고, 건설기의 조선문학"
- 戶坂潤, "日本イデオロギ－論－現代日本に於ける日本主義·ファッシズム·自由主義·思想の批判" (1977), 岩波書店
- 田村德治, "協和戰爭の確信とその根據", 日本評論, pp.70~76 (1938)
- 四方博, "朝鮮", 社會經濟史學, 10(11) (1941)
- 高麗大學校九十年誌編纂委員會, "高麗大學校九十年誌" (1995), 高麗大學校出版部
- 김경일, "이재유연구－1930년대 서울의 혁명적 노동운동" (1993), 창작과비평사
- 김용섭, "남북 학술원과 과학원의 발달" (2005), 지식산업사
- 홍일표, "근대주체와 식민지 규율권력" (1997), 문화과학
- 박광현, "경성제대와 新興", 한국문학연구, 11(26), pp.247~274 (2003), 한국문학연구소
- 박한용, "경성제대 반제동맹사건 연구, In 일제말 조선사회와 민족해방운동" (1991), 일송정
- 방기중, "한국근현대사상사연구－1930·40년대 백남운의 학문과 정치경제사상" (1992), 역사비평사
- 서동만, "1950년대 북한의 정치 갈등과 이데올로기 상황, In 1950년대 남북한의 선택과 굴절" (1998), 역사비평사
- 손정수, "신남철·박치우의 사상과 그 해석에 작용하는 경성제국대학이라는 장", 한국학연구, 14 (2005)
- 심지연, "이강국 연구" (2006), 백산서당
- 에드워드 w. 사이드, "권력과 지성인" (1996), 도서출판 窓
- H.S.휴즈, "파시즘과 지식인－1930~1965년의 서구사회사상" (1983), 한울
- 연세대학교백년사편찬위원회, "연세대학교백년사 1연세통사(상)" (1985), 연세대학교출판부
- 馬越徹, "한국 근대대학의 성립과 전개－대학 모델의 전파연구" (2001), 교육과학사
- 윤대석, "아카데미즘과 현실 사이의 긴장- 박치우의 삶과 사상", 우리말글, 36, pp.371~397 (2006), 우리말글학회
- 李秀日, "1930년대 社會主義者들의 現實認識과 마르크스주의 이해－城大그룹을 중심으로, In 韓國近現代의 民族問題와 新國家建設" (1997), 知識産業社
- 李秀日, "1920~30年代韓國의 經濟學風과 經濟硏究의 動向：延專商科및 普專商科를 중심으로", 연세경제연구, 4(2) (1997)
- 정종현, "신남철과 ‘대학’ 제도의 안과 밖 ― 식민지 ‘학지(學知)’의 연속과 비연속 ―", 한국어문학연구, (54), pp.381~430 (2010), 한국어문학연구학회
- 차승기, "반근대적 상상력의 임계들：식민지 조선 담론장에서의 전통·세계·주체" (2009), 푸른역사
- 洪性讚, "일제하 延專商科의 經濟學風과 ‘經濟硏究會事件’", 연세경제연구, 1 (1994)
- 洪淳權, "1930년대 한국의 맑스주의 역사학과 아시아적 생산양식 논쟁", 東亞論叢, 31 (1994)
- 鹿野政直, "近代日本の民間學" (1983), 岩波書店
- 北川隆吉, "アカデミズムの危機", 中央公論, 75(2) (1960)
- 松本常彦, "アカデミズムと强壓－その槪況と瀧川事件", 國文學：解釋と敎材の硏究, 47(9) (2002)
- 三つ井崇, "朝鮮植民地支配と言語" (2010), 明石書店
- 向坂逸郞, "嵐のなかの百年－學問彈壓小史" (1952), 勁草書房
- 鶴園裕, "近代朝鮮における國學の形成－ 「朝鮮學」 を中心に", 朝鮮史硏究會論文集, 35 (1997)
- 阿部洋, "日本統治下朝鮮の高等敎育－京城帝國大學と民立大學設立運動をめぐって", 思想, (565) (1971)
- 米谷匡史, "戰時期日本の社會思想－現代化と戰時變革", 思想, (882) (1997)
- 洪宗郁, "戰時期朝鮮の轉向者たち－帝國／植民地の統合と龜裂" (2011), 有志舍