‘道義의 제국’과 식민지조선의 내셔널 아이덴티티
Rhetoric of “Morality and Righteousness” and the Formation of National Identity in Colonial Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to consider “national identity” in Colonial Korea. What was national identity in Colonial Korea, a society without “nationhood”? If it did exist in what way was it created? If the creation of the national identity by Colonial Korean intellectuals was formed as a thing in opposition to the imperial Japanese construct that national identity equaled imperial identity what exactly was it? Under the all-out war system that accompanied the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War, what kind of conditions prevailed that made the production of a national identity in Colonial Korea possible? And was there continuity or discontinuity of this national identity after “liberation” from Japan in 1945? In order to carry out this research on the “joint ownership” of Korean nationality, this study focuses on national identity in Colonial Korea in the 1930s and 1940s. In the “National Studies” (Joseon Studies) of the 1930s and 1940s we can find an emphasis on the analysis of the discourse of “morality and righteousness” as in the “Rhetoric of the Empire” between Imperial Japanese and Colonial Korean intellectuals after the Sino-Japanese War. The discourse of “morality and righteousness” also occupied the central position in the formation of Korean national identity after “liberation”. This study examines how the colonial-period discourse on “morality and righteousness” among Korean intellectuals of Colonial Korea in the 1930s and 1940s prepared the ground for post-liberation discourse on national identity.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to consider “national identity” in Colonial Korea. What was national identity in Colonial Korea, a society without “nationhood”? If it did exist in what way was it created? If the creation of the national identity by Colonial Korean intellectuals was formed as a thing in opposition to the imperial Japanese construct that national identity equaled imperial identity what exactly was it? Under the all-out war system that accompanied the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War, what kind of conditions prevailed that made the production of a national identity in Colonial Korea possible? And was there continuity or discontinuity of this national identity after “liberation” from Japan in 1945? In order to carry out this research on the “joint ownership” of Korean nationality, this study focuses on national identity in Colonial Korea in the 1930s and 1940s. In the “National Studies” (Joseon Studies) of the 1930s and 1940s we can find an emphasis on the analysis of the discourse of “morality and righteousness” as in the “Rhetoric of the Empire” between Imperial Japanese and Colonial Korean intellectuals after the Sino-Japanese War. The discourse of “morality and righteousness” also occupied the central position in the formation of Korean national identity after “liberation”. This study examines how the colonial-period discourse on “morality and righteousness” among Korean intellectuals of Colonial Korea in the 1930s and 1940s prepared the ground for post-liberation discourse on national identity.
참고문헌 (76)
- 米原謙, "近代日本のアイデンティティと政治" (2002), ネルヴァ書房
- 中谷猛, "ナショナル·アイデンティティ論の現在" (2003), 晃洋書房
- 西川長夫, "<新> 植民地主議論" (2006), 平凡社
- 大澤真幸, "ナショナリズムの由来", ~ (2007)
- 강해수, "植民地朝鮮における「東方」という<境界>とナショナルな知の形成 - 崔南善の『不咸文化論』を中心に -", 일본연구, 21, pp.165~188 (2003), 일본연구소
- 佐々充昭, "亡命ディアスポラによる朝鮮ナショナル·アイデンティティの創出─大倧教が大韓民国臨時政府運動に及ぼした影響を中心に", 朝鮮史研究会論文集, 43 (2005)
- 帝国日本の文化連環─ナショナリズムと反復する植民地主義, "植民地朝鮮", pp.2007, 趙寛子
- 民族, "継続する植民地主義─ジェンダー", pp.岩崎稔, 人種
- 전규찬, "국민의 동원, '국민'의 형성 : 한국사회 '국민'담론의 계보학", 한국언론정보학보, 31통권 : 31, pp.261~294 (2005), 한국언론정보학회
- 강해수, "近代朝鮮における「儒儒」の言とナショナルな知の成立", 인문연구, (50), pp.81~112 (2006), 인문과학연구소
- 子安宣邦, "漢字論─不可避の他者" (2003), 岩波書店
- 강해수, "『朝鮮学』の成立 in: 江戸の思想 7" (1997)
- 강해수, "植民地 『朝鮮』における 『国文学史』の成立─趙潤済の 『文学史』叙述を中心にして in: 世紀転換期の国際秩序と国民文化の変容" (1999), 柏書房
- 김병구, "고전부흥의 기획과 '조선적인 것'의 형성", 민족문학사연구, (31), pp.12~38 (2006), 민족문학사학회
- 고야스 노부쿠니, "日本ナショナリズムの解読", pp.145~ (2007), 白沢社
- 渡辺正盛, "日本的なるものヽ研究" (1937), 啓文社出版
- 강해수, "한국과 일본연구에 대한 비판적 검토 주로 문화론·사상사 연구 방면에서", 일본연구, 20, pp.115~132 (2003), 일본연구소
- 子安宣邦, "日本ナショナリズムの解読"
- Spurr, David, "The Rhetoric of Empire" (1933), Duke University Press
- 孫晋泰, "조선민족사개론" (1948), 을유문화사
- 고마츠 겐타로(小松堅太郎), "新民族主義論" (1940), 日本評論社
- 남근우, "신민족주의' 사관 재고: 손진태와 식민주의", 정신문화연구, 29(4), pp.87~117 (2006), 한국학중앙연구원
- 橋川文三, "国体論·二つの前提 in: 橋川文三著作集 2", pp.111~ (2000), 筑摩書房
- 姜尚中, "ナショナリズム", pp.85~ (2002), 岩波書店
- 綾川武治, "満州事変の世界史的意義" (1936), 大陸国策研究所, 宇田尚
- "道義概論" (1943), 酒井書房
- 高坂正顕, "民族の哲学", pp.129~ (1942), 岩波書店
- 子安宣邦, "『世界史の哲学』の時", 現代思想, 35(5) (2007)
- "新日本の思想原理 in: 三木清全集 第17卷", pp.533~ (1968)
- 강해수, "근대 조선의 ‘세계사’ 경험과 역사철학자00 －‘교토학파(京都學派)’의 논의와 관련하여－", 일본문화연구, 18(18), pp.7~26 (2006), 동아시아일본학회
- 崔眞碩, "朴致祐における暴力の予感", 現代思想, 31(3) (2003), 靑土社
- 趙寬子, "植民地朝鮮における三木清と東亜協同体", 場, (36) (2007), こぶし文庫
- "만몽문화 in: 육당최남선전집 제10권", pp.316~ (1974), 현암사
- 강해수, "최남선의 만몽인식과 제국의 욕망", 역사비평, (76), pp.58~89 (2006), 역사문제연구소
- "실천문학", pp.153~154 (1885)
- 김윤식, "학병 권유차 동경에 간 최남선, 이광수의 <東京對談>", 서정시학, (봄), pp.84~ (2007)
- 帝国日本の文化連環-ナショナリズムと反復する植民地主義, "親日ナショナリズム’の形成·破綻·反復 in: 植民地朝鮮", pp.2007, 조관자
- "화랑도연구", pp.14~15 (1954), 동국문화사
- 박치우, "동아협동체론의 一省察 in: 인문평론", pp.15~17 (1940)
- "内鮮一体論", 国民評論社
- 현영섭, "도의국가로서의 일본 in: 朝鮮人の進むべき道" (1938), 緑旗聯盟
- 鹽原時三郞, "道義立國精神의 昻揚-國民精神總動員하의 紀元節에 際하야", 在滿조선인통신, (46) (1939)
- 田平秀, "道義心을 涵養하자", 在滿조선인통신, (59) (1939)
- 洪諟, "道義心의 涵養이 필요", 在滿조선인통신, (67) (1939)
- 石本清四郎, "道義国家の建設と民族協和", 朝鮮, (328) (1942)
- "한용운전집 제2권", pp.359~ (1937)
- 朝鮮總督府情報課, "新しき朝鮮", pp.24~ (1944), 朝鮮行政學會
- "권두언-道義朝鮮의 확립", 春秋, 3(8) (1942), 朝鮮春秋社
- 金子斗禎, "半島皇民生活物語", 조선사상국방협회
- 鎌田澤一郎, "国体の本義と道義の朝鮮" (1944), 京城日報社
- 田花為雄, "道義朝鮮の建設と家庭教育 in: 文教の朝鮮" (1942)
- 安東相老, "道義朝鮮と仏教の使命", 朝鮮, (346) (1944)
- 윤치호, "영문판 『윤치호일기』(제11권)", 425~
- "国民総力運動要覧", 77~
- 일제하 조선에서의 국가총력전체제와 조선인의 생활--‘皇国臣民의 錬成’을 중심으로 in: 한일역사공동연구보고서 제5권, "鄭在政", 한일역사공동위원회, ~ (2005)
- "1948년 8월15일자 『서울신문』의 사설 ｢대한민국 정부수립 선포｣", ~ (1948)
- Im, Chong-Myong, "he Making of the Republic of Korea as a Modern Nation-State", 박사, pp.1948
- 임종명, "제1공화국 초기 대한민국의 가족국가화와 內破", 한국사연구, (130), pp.289~329 (2005), 한국사연구회
- 서중석, "이승만정권 초기의 일민주의와 파시즘 in: 1950년대 남북한의 선택과 굴절" (1998), 역사문제연구소
- "李大統領建國政治理念－一民主義의 理論的 展開", pp.65~ (1949), 聯合新聞社
- 김두헌, "윤리학개론" (1946)
- 김두헌, "민족원론" (1960)
- 김두헌, "서양윤리학사" (1976)
- 김두헌, "민족과 국가 in: 학풍" (1950)
- 김두현, "道義原論--韓國民이 생각하고 나아갈 길", 乙酉문화사
- 김두현, "일본정신의 본질: 명저해설", 인문평론, 3 (1939)
- 정상철, "일본정신의 본질"
- 류미나, "경학원의국민도덕론생산", 인문연구, (52), pp.63~86 (2007), 인문과학연구소
- 崔奎南, "국민도덕" (1898), 도서출판俱樂部
- 윤해동, "‘국체'와 ‘국민’의 거리－탈식민시기의 식민주의", 역사문제연구, (15), pp.78~ (2005)
- 송양섭, "화랑도(花郞徒) 교육에 관한 연구", 인문사회교육연구, (8) (2005)
- 정종현, "국민국가와 '화랑도': 애국계몽기-대한민국 건국기의 '화랑' 담론과 활용양상을 중심으로", 정신문화연구, 29(4), pp.179~206 (2006), 한국학중앙연구원
- 이항녕, "한국민족의 세계사적 사명", 국민윤리연구, pp.83~ (1973)
- 姜尙中, "愛国の作法" (2007), 朝日新聞社
- 子安宣邦, "歴史の共有体としての東アジア─日露戦争と日韓の歴史認識" (2007), 藤原書店
- "도덕교육의 파시즘-노예도덕을 넘어서", pp.315~316 (2006), 도서출판 길