본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Descriptive Analysis of Key N-grams in Korean English Learners’ Writing

1

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The purpose of this study is to investigate Korean English learners’ use of formulaic language,focusing on continuous sequences of 4 words (4-grams). Since the use of 4-grams indicates learners’ proficiency in language use, it can be a good way to demonstrate how they use language. In particular, the study analyses 4-grams in terms of keyness. To this end, two lists of key 4-grams extracted from argumentative essays are contrastively compared check for any discrepancies between key 4-grams of Korean English learners and those of native learners. The comparison is based on three factors: type, token and type-token ratio (TTR). The results of the study show that Korean learners have a limited set of 4-grams which seem to be acquired from their previous learning, and these do not reflect topics or themes that appear in the native learners’ list of key 4-grams.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate Korean English learners’ use of formulaic language,focusing on continuous sequences of 4 words (4-grams). Since the use of 4-grams indicates learners’ proficiency in language use, it can be a good way to demonstrate how they use language. In particular, the study analyses 4-grams in terms of keyness. To this end, two lists of key 4-grams extracted from argumentative essays are contrastively compared check for any discrepancies between key 4-grams of Korean English learners and those of native learners. The comparison is based on three factors: type, token and type-token ratio (TTR). The results of the study show that Korean learners have a limited set of 4-grams which seem to be acquired from their previous learning, and these do not reflect topics or themes that appear in the native learners’ list of key 4-grams.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Ädel, A., "Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English : A lexical bundles approach", English for Specific Purposes, 31, pp.81~92 (2012)
  2. Altenberg, B., "On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations, In Phraseology: Theory, analysis and applications", pp.101~122 (1998), Oxford University Press
  3. Biber, D., "Lexical bundles in university spoken and written register", English for Specific Purposes, 26, pp.263~286 (2007)
  4. Biber, D., "If you look at… : Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks", Applied Linguistics, 25(3), pp.371~405 (2004)
  5. Biber, D., "Language grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
  6. Chen, Y., "Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing", Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), pp.30~49 (2010)
  7. Conklin, K., "Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers?", Applied Linguistics, 29(1), pp.72~89 (2008)
  8. Cortes, V., "Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology", English for Specific Purposes, 23, pp.397~423 (2004)
  9. Durrant, P., "To what extent do native and non-native writers make use of collocations?", IRAL, 47, pp.157~177 (2009)
  10. Erman, B., "Formulaic language from a learner perspective: What the learner needs to know, In Formulaic language", pp.27~50 (2009), John Benjamins
  11. Granger, S., "Learner English on computer" (1998), Longman
  12. Howarth, P., "The phraseology of learners’ academic writing, In Phraseology", pp.145~160 (1998), Oxford University Press
  13. 홍신철, "The Compliation of a Maritime English Corpus for Esp Learners", 영어학, 10(4), pp.963~985 (2010), 한국영어학회
  14. 홍신철, "An n-gram Analysis of Maritime English", 언어과학연구, 61(61), pp.283~302 (2012), 언어과학회[DOI]
  15. Hyland, K., "As can be seen : Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation", English for Specific Purposes, 27, pp.4~21 (2008)
  16. Jiang, N., "The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers", The Modern Language Journal, 91, pp.433~445 (2007)
  17. Kennedy, C., "A corpus investigation of linguistic responses to an IELTS Academic writing task, In IELTS collected paper: Research in speaking and writing assessment", pp.316~378 (2007), Cambridge University Press
  18. Lewis, M., "The idiom principle of L2 English: Assessing elusive formulaic sequences as indicators of idiomaticity, fluency, and proficiency" (2009), VDM Verlag
  19. Scott, M., (2010), Oxford University Press
  20. Simpson-Vlach, R., "An academic formulas list : New methods in phraseology research", Applied Linguistics, 31, pp.487~512 (2010)
  21. Stubbs, M., "Quantitative data on multi-word sequences in English: Distribution, structures and functions, In Corpus Linguistics 25 years on", pp.89~105 (2007), Radopi
  22. Wray, A., "Formulaic language, In Encyclopedia of language and linguistics", pp.590~597 (2006), Elsevier

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)